Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ward,Laura S.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Kloos,Richard T.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001
Resumo: An indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology result occurs about every sixth fine-needle aspiration. These indeterminate nodules harbor a 24% risk of malignancy (ROM); too high to ignore, but driving surgery where most nodules are benign. Molecular diagnostics have emerged to ideally avoid surgery when appropriate, and to trigger the correct therapeutic surgery when indicated, as opposed to an incomplete diagnostic surgery. No current molecular test offers both high sensitivity and high specificity. A molecular diagnostic test with high sensitivity (e.g. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier sensitivity 90%) offers a high Negative Predictive Value when the ROM is relatively low, such as < 30%. Only such tests can "rule-out" cancer. In this setting, a molecularly benign result suggests the same ROM as that of operated cytologically benign nodules (~6%). Thus, clinical observation can replace diagnostic surgery; increasing quality of life and decreasing medical costs. However, its low specificity cannot "rule-in" cancer as a suspicious result has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ~40%, perhaps too low to routinely reflex to definitive cancer surgery. Conversely, high specificity tests (BRAF, RAS, PPAR/PAX-8, RET/PTC, PTEN) offer high PPV results, and only these tests can "rule-in" cancer. Here a positive molecular result warrants definitive therapeutic surgery. However, their low sensitivity cannot "rule-out" cancer and a negative molecular result cannot dissuade diagnostic surgery; limiting their cost-effectiveness. Whether or not there is a useful and cost-effective role to sequentially combine these approaches, or to modify existing approaches, is under investigation.
id SBEM-2_dfbbc03a68e9a3864c750fbeed4615a6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27302013000200001
network_acronym_str SBEM-2
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodulesBiopsy, fine-needleDNA mutational analysisgene expressiongenomicsmolecular diagnostic techniquesAn indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology result occurs about every sixth fine-needle aspiration. These indeterminate nodules harbor a 24% risk of malignancy (ROM); too high to ignore, but driving surgery where most nodules are benign. Molecular diagnostics have emerged to ideally avoid surgery when appropriate, and to trigger the correct therapeutic surgery when indicated, as opposed to an incomplete diagnostic surgery. No current molecular test offers both high sensitivity and high specificity. A molecular diagnostic test with high sensitivity (e.g. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier sensitivity 90%) offers a high Negative Predictive Value when the ROM is relatively low, such as < 30%. Only such tests can "rule-out" cancer. In this setting, a molecularly benign result suggests the same ROM as that of operated cytologically benign nodules (~6%). Thus, clinical observation can replace diagnostic surgery; increasing quality of life and decreasing medical costs. However, its low specificity cannot "rule-in" cancer as a suspicious result has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ~40%, perhaps too low to routinely reflex to definitive cancer surgery. Conversely, high specificity tests (BRAF, RAS, PPAR/PAX-8, RET/PTC, PTEN) offer high PPV results, and only these tests can "rule-in" cancer. Here a positive molecular result warrants definitive therapeutic surgery. However, their low sensitivity cannot "rule-out" cancer and a negative molecular result cannot dissuade diagnostic surgery; limiting their cost-effectiveness. Whether or not there is a useful and cost-effective role to sequentially combine these approaches, or to modify existing approaches, is under investigation.Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia &amp; Metabologia v.57 n.2 2013reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)instacron:SBEM10.1590/S0004-27302013000200001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWard,Laura S.Kloos,Richard T.eng2013-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27302013000200001Revistahttps://www.aem-sbem.com/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||abem-editoria@endocrino.org.br1677-94870004-2730opendoar:2013-07-02T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
title Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
spellingShingle Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
Ward,Laura S.
Biopsy, fine-needle
DNA mutational analysis
gene expression
genomics
molecular diagnostic techniques
title_short Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
title_full Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
title_fullStr Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
title_full_unstemmed Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
title_sort Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
author Ward,Laura S.
author_facet Ward,Laura S.
Kloos,Richard T.
author_role author
author2 Kloos,Richard T.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ward,Laura S.
Kloos,Richard T.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopsy, fine-needle
DNA mutational analysis
gene expression
genomics
molecular diagnostic techniques
topic Biopsy, fine-needle
DNA mutational analysis
gene expression
genomics
molecular diagnostic techniques
description An indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology result occurs about every sixth fine-needle aspiration. These indeterminate nodules harbor a 24% risk of malignancy (ROM); too high to ignore, but driving surgery where most nodules are benign. Molecular diagnostics have emerged to ideally avoid surgery when appropriate, and to trigger the correct therapeutic surgery when indicated, as opposed to an incomplete diagnostic surgery. No current molecular test offers both high sensitivity and high specificity. A molecular diagnostic test with high sensitivity (e.g. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier sensitivity 90%) offers a high Negative Predictive Value when the ROM is relatively low, such as < 30%. Only such tests can "rule-out" cancer. In this setting, a molecularly benign result suggests the same ROM as that of operated cytologically benign nodules (~6%). Thus, clinical observation can replace diagnostic surgery; increasing quality of life and decreasing medical costs. However, its low specificity cannot "rule-in" cancer as a suspicious result has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ~40%, perhaps too low to routinely reflex to definitive cancer surgery. Conversely, high specificity tests (BRAF, RAS, PPAR/PAX-8, RET/PTC, PTEN) offer high PPV results, and only these tests can "rule-in" cancer. Here a positive molecular result warrants definitive therapeutic surgery. However, their low sensitivity cannot "rule-out" cancer and a negative molecular result cannot dissuade diagnostic surgery; limiting their cost-effectiveness. Whether or not there is a useful and cost-effective role to sequentially combine these approaches, or to modify existing approaches, is under investigation.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0004-27302013000200001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia &amp; Metabologia v.57 n.2 2013
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron:SBEM
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
instacron_str SBEM
institution SBEM
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||abem-editoria@endocrino.org.br
_version_ 1754734812226125824