Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001 |
Resumo: | An indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology result occurs about every sixth fine-needle aspiration. These indeterminate nodules harbor a 24% risk of malignancy (ROM); too high to ignore, but driving surgery where most nodules are benign. Molecular diagnostics have emerged to ideally avoid surgery when appropriate, and to trigger the correct therapeutic surgery when indicated, as opposed to an incomplete diagnostic surgery. No current molecular test offers both high sensitivity and high specificity. A molecular diagnostic test with high sensitivity (e.g. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier sensitivity 90%) offers a high Negative Predictive Value when the ROM is relatively low, such as < 30%. Only such tests can "rule-out" cancer. In this setting, a molecularly benign result suggests the same ROM as that of operated cytologically benign nodules (~6%). Thus, clinical observation can replace diagnostic surgery; increasing quality of life and decreasing medical costs. However, its low specificity cannot "rule-in" cancer as a suspicious result has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ~40%, perhaps too low to routinely reflex to definitive cancer surgery. Conversely, high specificity tests (BRAF, RAS, PPAR/PAX-8, RET/PTC, PTEN) offer high PPV results, and only these tests can "rule-in" cancer. Here a positive molecular result warrants definitive therapeutic surgery. However, their low sensitivity cannot "rule-out" cancer and a negative molecular result cannot dissuade diagnostic surgery; limiting their cost-effectiveness. Whether or not there is a useful and cost-effective role to sequentially combine these approaches, or to modify existing approaches, is under investigation. |
id |
SBEM-2_dfbbc03a68e9a3864c750fbeed4615a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-27302013000200001 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEM-2 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodulesBiopsy, fine-needleDNA mutational analysisgene expressiongenomicsmolecular diagnostic techniquesAn indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology result occurs about every sixth fine-needle aspiration. These indeterminate nodules harbor a 24% risk of malignancy (ROM); too high to ignore, but driving surgery where most nodules are benign. Molecular diagnostics have emerged to ideally avoid surgery when appropriate, and to trigger the correct therapeutic surgery when indicated, as opposed to an incomplete diagnostic surgery. No current molecular test offers both high sensitivity and high specificity. A molecular diagnostic test with high sensitivity (e.g. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier sensitivity 90%) offers a high Negative Predictive Value when the ROM is relatively low, such as < 30%. Only such tests can "rule-out" cancer. In this setting, a molecularly benign result suggests the same ROM as that of operated cytologically benign nodules (~6%). Thus, clinical observation can replace diagnostic surgery; increasing quality of life and decreasing medical costs. However, its low specificity cannot "rule-in" cancer as a suspicious result has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ~40%, perhaps too low to routinely reflex to definitive cancer surgery. Conversely, high specificity tests (BRAF, RAS, PPAR/PAX-8, RET/PTC, PTEN) offer high PPV results, and only these tests can "rule-in" cancer. Here a positive molecular result warrants definitive therapeutic surgery. However, their low sensitivity cannot "rule-out" cancer and a negative molecular result cannot dissuade diagnostic surgery; limiting their cost-effectiveness. Whether or not there is a useful and cost-effective role to sequentially combine these approaches, or to modify existing approaches, is under investigation.Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia v.57 n.2 2013reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)instacron:SBEM10.1590/S0004-27302013000200001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWard,Laura S.Kloos,Richard T.eng2013-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27302013000200001Revistahttps://www.aem-sbem.com/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||abem-editoria@endocrino.org.br1677-94870004-2730opendoar:2013-07-02T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
title |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
spellingShingle |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules Ward,Laura S. Biopsy, fine-needle DNA mutational analysis gene expression genomics molecular diagnostic techniques |
title_short |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
title_full |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
title_fullStr |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
title_full_unstemmed |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
title_sort |
Molecular markers in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules |
author |
Ward,Laura S. |
author_facet |
Ward,Laura S. Kloos,Richard T. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kloos,Richard T. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ward,Laura S. Kloos,Richard T. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biopsy, fine-needle DNA mutational analysis gene expression genomics molecular diagnostic techniques |
topic |
Biopsy, fine-needle DNA mutational analysis gene expression genomics molecular diagnostic techniques |
description |
An indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology result occurs about every sixth fine-needle aspiration. These indeterminate nodules harbor a 24% risk of malignancy (ROM); too high to ignore, but driving surgery where most nodules are benign. Molecular diagnostics have emerged to ideally avoid surgery when appropriate, and to trigger the correct therapeutic surgery when indicated, as opposed to an incomplete diagnostic surgery. No current molecular test offers both high sensitivity and high specificity. A molecular diagnostic test with high sensitivity (e.g. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier sensitivity 90%) offers a high Negative Predictive Value when the ROM is relatively low, such as < 30%. Only such tests can "rule-out" cancer. In this setting, a molecularly benign result suggests the same ROM as that of operated cytologically benign nodules (~6%). Thus, clinical observation can replace diagnostic surgery; increasing quality of life and decreasing medical costs. However, its low specificity cannot "rule-in" cancer as a suspicious result has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ~40%, perhaps too low to routinely reflex to definitive cancer surgery. Conversely, high specificity tests (BRAF, RAS, PPAR/PAX-8, RET/PTC, PTEN) offer high PPV results, and only these tests can "rule-in" cancer. Here a positive molecular result warrants definitive therapeutic surgery. However, their low sensitivity cannot "rule-out" cancer and a negative molecular result cannot dissuade diagnostic surgery; limiting their cost-effectiveness. Whether or not there is a useful and cost-effective role to sequentially combine these approaches, or to modify existing approaches, is under investigation. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27302013000200001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0004-27302013000200001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia v.57 n.2 2013 reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM) instacron:SBEM |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM) |
instacron_str |
SBEM |
institution |
SBEM |
reponame_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||abem-editoria@endocrino.org.br |
_version_ |
1754734812226125824 |