Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho,Lívia Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ladeira,Verônica Aparecida, Almeida,Elka Fabiana Aparecida, Santa-Cecília,Lenira Viana Costa, Brighenti,Deodoro Magno, Resende,Erivelton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2447-536X2018000400353
Resumo: ABSTRACT Stingless bee Trigona spinipes (Hymenoptera: Apidae) is an important pest of calla lily, Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.), damaging flowers, especially the spadix. The aim was to identify the most efficient packaging for bagging calla lily inflorescences, aiming to protect against the attack of stingless bee and to maintain postharvest quality. The experiment was carried out in a calla lily plantation cultivated in soil under 50% shading screen. Treatments consisted in bagging calla lily flowers with: 1) brown kraft paper bag, 2) non-woven fabric (NWF) bag; 3) transparent plastic bag, 4) transparent micro-perforated plastic bag and 5) control (without bagging). The experimental design was completely randomized with 25 replicates and one inflorescence per plot. Inflorescences received treatments when they presented definitive color, but still with completely closed spathe. Seven days after bagging, inflorescences were collected and evaluated for damages caused by insects in the field and the postharvest characteristics. Postharvest quality evaluations of inflorescences were performed for 12 days, observing expansion of the spathe in length and width, stem weight and visual quality expressed by the number of days that remained in each class. The bagging of calla lily inflorescences was efficient in the control of stingless bee, regardless of packaging used, because under these conditions, no inflorescence presented damage. In control, 84% of damaged inflorescences were observed. Differences in postharvest characteristics were observed and inflorescences remained for longer periods in the process of spathe opening, which is characterized by the measurement of their length and width, when packed. Among packages, NWF allowed longer spathe length at the 6th day of evaluation, larger width at 7th day of evaluation and less fresh mass loss at the end of the experiment (8%). In control, reduction of spathe measurements from the first day of evaluation and loss of 11% of fresh mass were observed. It was concluded that NWF is an efficient packaging to protect calla lily against the attack of stingless bee without compromising the postharvest quality of inflorescences.
id SBFPO-1_3dd46e79ebf8809827a6a62f7f61d243
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2447-536X2018000400353
network_acronym_str SBFPO-1
network_name_str Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)Zantedeschia aethiopicaalternative control of pestsfloriculturepest managementABSTRACT Stingless bee Trigona spinipes (Hymenoptera: Apidae) is an important pest of calla lily, Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.), damaging flowers, especially the spadix. The aim was to identify the most efficient packaging for bagging calla lily inflorescences, aiming to protect against the attack of stingless bee and to maintain postharvest quality. The experiment was carried out in a calla lily plantation cultivated in soil under 50% shading screen. Treatments consisted in bagging calla lily flowers with: 1) brown kraft paper bag, 2) non-woven fabric (NWF) bag; 3) transparent plastic bag, 4) transparent micro-perforated plastic bag and 5) control (without bagging). The experimental design was completely randomized with 25 replicates and one inflorescence per plot. Inflorescences received treatments when they presented definitive color, but still with completely closed spathe. Seven days after bagging, inflorescences were collected and evaluated for damages caused by insects in the field and the postharvest characteristics. Postharvest quality evaluations of inflorescences were performed for 12 days, observing expansion of the spathe in length and width, stem weight and visual quality expressed by the number of days that remained in each class. The bagging of calla lily inflorescences was efficient in the control of stingless bee, regardless of packaging used, because under these conditions, no inflorescence presented damage. In control, 84% of damaged inflorescences were observed. Differences in postharvest characteristics were observed and inflorescences remained for longer periods in the process of spathe opening, which is characterized by the measurement of their length and width, when packed. Among packages, NWF allowed longer spathe length at the 6th day of evaluation, larger width at 7th day of evaluation and less fresh mass loss at the end of the experiment (8%). In control, reduction of spathe measurements from the first day of evaluation and loss of 11% of fresh mass were observed. It was concluded that NWF is an efficient packaging to protect calla lily against the attack of stingless bee without compromising the postharvest quality of inflorescences.Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2447-536X2018000400353Ornamental Horticulture v.24 n.4 2018reponame:Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais (SBFPO)instacron:SBFPO10.14295/oh.v24i4.1193info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Lívia MendesLadeira,Verônica AparecidaAlmeida,Elka Fabiana AparecidaSanta-Cecília,Lenira Viana CostaBrighenti,Deodoro MagnoResende,Eriveltoneng2019-02-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2447-536X2018000400353Revistahttp://ornamentalhorticulture.emnuvens.com.br/rbho/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.ornamentalhorticulture@gmail.com2447-536X2447-536Xopendoar:2019-02-20T00:00Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais (SBFPO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
title Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
spellingShingle Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
Carvalho,Lívia Mendes
Zantedeschia aethiopica
alternative control of pests
floriculture
pest management
title_short Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
title_full Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
title_fullStr Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
title_full_unstemmed Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
title_sort Bagging to protect calla lily flowers against stingless bee (Trigona spinipes)
author Carvalho,Lívia Mendes
author_facet Carvalho,Lívia Mendes
Ladeira,Verônica Aparecida
Almeida,Elka Fabiana Aparecida
Santa-Cecília,Lenira Viana Costa
Brighenti,Deodoro Magno
Resende,Erivelton
author_role author
author2 Ladeira,Verônica Aparecida
Almeida,Elka Fabiana Aparecida
Santa-Cecília,Lenira Viana Costa
Brighenti,Deodoro Magno
Resende,Erivelton
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho,Lívia Mendes
Ladeira,Verônica Aparecida
Almeida,Elka Fabiana Aparecida
Santa-Cecília,Lenira Viana Costa
Brighenti,Deodoro Magno
Resende,Erivelton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zantedeschia aethiopica
alternative control of pests
floriculture
pest management
topic Zantedeschia aethiopica
alternative control of pests
floriculture
pest management
description ABSTRACT Stingless bee Trigona spinipes (Hymenoptera: Apidae) is an important pest of calla lily, Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.), damaging flowers, especially the spadix. The aim was to identify the most efficient packaging for bagging calla lily inflorescences, aiming to protect against the attack of stingless bee and to maintain postharvest quality. The experiment was carried out in a calla lily plantation cultivated in soil under 50% shading screen. Treatments consisted in bagging calla lily flowers with: 1) brown kraft paper bag, 2) non-woven fabric (NWF) bag; 3) transparent plastic bag, 4) transparent micro-perforated plastic bag and 5) control (without bagging). The experimental design was completely randomized with 25 replicates and one inflorescence per plot. Inflorescences received treatments when they presented definitive color, but still with completely closed spathe. Seven days after bagging, inflorescences were collected and evaluated for damages caused by insects in the field and the postharvest characteristics. Postharvest quality evaluations of inflorescences were performed for 12 days, observing expansion of the spathe in length and width, stem weight and visual quality expressed by the number of days that remained in each class. The bagging of calla lily inflorescences was efficient in the control of stingless bee, regardless of packaging used, because under these conditions, no inflorescence presented damage. In control, 84% of damaged inflorescences were observed. Differences in postharvest characteristics were observed and inflorescences remained for longer periods in the process of spathe opening, which is characterized by the measurement of their length and width, when packed. Among packages, NWF allowed longer spathe length at the 6th day of evaluation, larger width at 7th day of evaluation and less fresh mass loss at the end of the experiment (8%). In control, reduction of spathe measurements from the first day of evaluation and loss of 11% of fresh mass were observed. It was concluded that NWF is an efficient packaging to protect calla lily against the attack of stingless bee without compromising the postharvest quality of inflorescences.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2447-536X2018000400353
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2447-536X2018000400353
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.14295/oh.v24i4.1193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ornamental Horticulture v.24 n.4 2018
reponame:Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais (SBFPO)
instacron:SBFPO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais (SBFPO)
instacron_str SBFPO
institution SBFPO
reponame_str Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas)
collection Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ornamental Horticulture (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Floricultura e Plantas Ornamentais (SBFPO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.ornamentalhorticulture@gmail.com
_version_ 1754734900245692416