PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA'
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452016000200302 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT In the present work were evaluated the effects of propolis coatings of various botanical sources on quality traits of bananas cv. Prata (Musa sapientum L.) stored at room temperature. ´Prata´ bananas were selected and submitted to five postharvest treatments: four coatings applied by immersion in propolis extracts at a concentration of 2.5% (w/v) and a control (without coating). Propolis extracts were applied as 1) a wild type aqueous propolis extract, 2) a wild type hydroalcoholic propolis extract, 3) a rosemary green type hydroalcoholic propolis extract and 4) a red type hydroalcoholic propolis extract. The bananas were evaluated at three-day intervals along 12 days for fresh weight losses, flesh firmness, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), the ratio SS/TA and pH. Sensory analyses were performed after three and six days of storage by 55 not trained panelists designed for acceptability. At the end of the twelve-day storage period, bananas coated either with the rosemary green hydroalcoholic extract or with the aqueous extract presented lower fresh weight losses in comparison to the bananas of the control treatment. No differences were determined in relation to flesh firmness and along the storage period TA values decreased and pH values increased in bananas of all treatments. SS contents increased towards the end of the storage period that, consequently, contributed to increases in the SS/TA ratio. The most significant increase in SS/TA ratio was determined in bananas coated with the red type hydroalcoholic extract. Taste panelists did not detect significant differences amongst coated and not coated cv. Prata bananas up to six days of storage. |
id |
SBFRU-1_82d31844579bb5c666e25d8d6b3a2a73 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-29452016000200302 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFRU-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA'Musa sp.hydroalcoholic extracttaste panelfruit acceptabilitystorageABSTRACT In the present work were evaluated the effects of propolis coatings of various botanical sources on quality traits of bananas cv. Prata (Musa sapientum L.) stored at room temperature. ´Prata´ bananas were selected and submitted to five postharvest treatments: four coatings applied by immersion in propolis extracts at a concentration of 2.5% (w/v) and a control (without coating). Propolis extracts were applied as 1) a wild type aqueous propolis extract, 2) a wild type hydroalcoholic propolis extract, 3) a rosemary green type hydroalcoholic propolis extract and 4) a red type hydroalcoholic propolis extract. The bananas were evaluated at three-day intervals along 12 days for fresh weight losses, flesh firmness, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), the ratio SS/TA and pH. Sensory analyses were performed after three and six days of storage by 55 not trained panelists designed for acceptability. At the end of the twelve-day storage period, bananas coated either with the rosemary green hydroalcoholic extract or with the aqueous extract presented lower fresh weight losses in comparison to the bananas of the control treatment. No differences were determined in relation to flesh firmness and along the storage period TA values decreased and pH values increased in bananas of all treatments. SS contents increased towards the end of the storage period that, consequently, contributed to increases in the SS/TA ratio. The most significant increase in SS/TA ratio was determined in bananas coated with the red type hydroalcoholic extract. Taste panelists did not detect significant differences amongst coated and not coated cv. Prata bananas up to six days of storage.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452016000200302Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.38 n.2 2016reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/0100-29452016931info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPASSOS,FLÁVIA REGINAMENDES,FABRÍCIA QUEIROZCUNHA,MARIANA CRIVELARI DAPIGOZZI,MARIANA TEIXEIRACARVALHO,ANDRÉ MUNDSTOCK XAVIER DEeng2016-06-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452016000200302Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2016-06-15T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
title |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
spellingShingle |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' PASSOS,FLÁVIA REGINA Musa sp. hydroalcoholic extract taste panel fruit acceptability storage |
title_short |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
title_full |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
title_fullStr |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
title_sort |
PROPOLIS EXTRACT IN POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION BANANA ' PRATA' |
author |
PASSOS,FLÁVIA REGINA |
author_facet |
PASSOS,FLÁVIA REGINA MENDES,FABRÍCIA QUEIROZ CUNHA,MARIANA CRIVELARI DA PIGOZZI,MARIANA TEIXEIRA CARVALHO,ANDRÉ MUNDSTOCK XAVIER DE |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MENDES,FABRÍCIA QUEIROZ CUNHA,MARIANA CRIVELARI DA PIGOZZI,MARIANA TEIXEIRA CARVALHO,ANDRÉ MUNDSTOCK XAVIER DE |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PASSOS,FLÁVIA REGINA MENDES,FABRÍCIA QUEIROZ CUNHA,MARIANA CRIVELARI DA PIGOZZI,MARIANA TEIXEIRA CARVALHO,ANDRÉ MUNDSTOCK XAVIER DE |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Musa sp. hydroalcoholic extract taste panel fruit acceptability storage |
topic |
Musa sp. hydroalcoholic extract taste panel fruit acceptability storage |
description |
ABSTRACT In the present work were evaluated the effects of propolis coatings of various botanical sources on quality traits of bananas cv. Prata (Musa sapientum L.) stored at room temperature. ´Prata´ bananas were selected and submitted to five postharvest treatments: four coatings applied by immersion in propolis extracts at a concentration of 2.5% (w/v) and a control (without coating). Propolis extracts were applied as 1) a wild type aqueous propolis extract, 2) a wild type hydroalcoholic propolis extract, 3) a rosemary green type hydroalcoholic propolis extract and 4) a red type hydroalcoholic propolis extract. The bananas were evaluated at three-day intervals along 12 days for fresh weight losses, flesh firmness, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), the ratio SS/TA and pH. Sensory analyses were performed after three and six days of storage by 55 not trained panelists designed for acceptability. At the end of the twelve-day storage period, bananas coated either with the rosemary green hydroalcoholic extract or with the aqueous extract presented lower fresh weight losses in comparison to the bananas of the control treatment. No differences were determined in relation to flesh firmness and along the storage period TA values decreased and pH values increased in bananas of all treatments. SS contents increased towards the end of the storage period that, consequently, contributed to increases in the SS/TA ratio. The most significant increase in SS/TA ratio was determined in bananas coated with the red type hydroalcoholic extract. Taste panelists did not detect significant differences amongst coated and not coated cv. Prata bananas up to six days of storage. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452016000200302 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452016000200302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-29452016931 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.38 n.2 2016 reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF) instacron:SBFRU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF) |
instacron_str |
SBFRU |
institution |
SBFRU |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/ |
_version_ |
1752122493701718016 |