The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ggaging.com/details/1791 |
Resumo: | <p>The use of Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence tool, for writing scientific articles has been reason for discussion by the academic community ever since its launch in late 2022. This artificial intelligence technology is becoming capable of generating fluent language, and distinguishing between text produced by ChatGPT and that written by people is becoming increasingly difficult. Here, we will present some topics to be discussed: (1) ensuring human verification; (2) establishing accountability rules; (3) avoiding the automatization of scientific production; (4) favoring truly open-source large language models (LLMs); (5) embracing the benefits of artificial intelligence; and (6) broadening the debate. With the emergence of these technologies, it is crucial to regulate, with continuous updates, the development and responsible use of LLMs with integrity, transparency, and honesty in research, along with scientists from various areas of knowledge, technology companies, large research funding bodies, science academies and universities, editors, non-governmental organizations, and law experts.</p> |
id |
SBGG_4b8487b3aecabbc734eb66efd9376314 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ggaging.com:1791 |
network_acronym_str |
SBGG |
network_name_str |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishingartificial intelligence research authorship ethics in scientific publishing.<p>The use of Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence tool, for writing scientific articles has been reason for discussion by the academic community ever since its launch in late 2022. This artificial intelligence technology is becoming capable of generating fluent language, and distinguishing between text produced by ChatGPT and that written by people is becoming increasingly difficult. Here, we will present some topics to be discussed: (1) ensuring human verification; (2) establishing accountability rules; (3) avoiding the automatization of scientific production; (4) favoring truly open-source large language models (LLMs); (5) embracing the benefits of artificial intelligence; and (6) broadening the debate. With the emergence of these technologies, it is crucial to regulate, with continuous updates, the development and responsible use of LLMs with integrity, transparency, and honesty in research, along with scientists from various areas of knowledge, technology companies, large research funding bodies, science academies and universities, editors, non-governmental organizations, and law experts.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/1791Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.17 n.0 2023reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGG10.53886/gga.e0230027info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Boas,Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas,José Vitor Polachini do Valle Villaseng2023-01-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:1791Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2023-01-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
title |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
spellingShingle |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing Boas,Paulo José Fortes Villas artificial intelligence research authorship ethics in scientific publishing. |
title_short |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
title_full |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
title_fullStr |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
title_full_unstemmed |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
title_sort |
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing |
author |
Boas,Paulo José Fortes Villas |
author_facet |
Boas,Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas,José Vitor Polachini do Valle Villas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Boas,José Vitor Polachini do Valle Villas |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Boas,Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas,José Vitor Polachini do Valle Villas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
artificial intelligence research authorship ethics in scientific publishing. |
topic |
artificial intelligence research authorship ethics in scientific publishing. |
description |
<p>The use of Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence tool, for writing scientific articles has been reason for discussion by the academic community ever since its launch in late 2022. This artificial intelligence technology is becoming capable of generating fluent language, and distinguishing between text produced by ChatGPT and that written by people is becoming increasingly difficult. Here, we will present some topics to be discussed: (1) ensuring human verification; (2) establishing accountability rules; (3) avoiding the automatization of scientific production; (4) favoring truly open-source large language models (LLMs); (5) embracing the benefits of artificial intelligence; and (6) broadening the debate. With the emergence of these technologies, it is crucial to regulate, with continuous updates, the development and responsible use of LLMs with integrity, transparency, and honesty in research, along with scientists from various areas of knowledge, technology companies, large research funding bodies, science academies and universities, editors, non-governmental organizations, and law experts.</p> |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ggaging.com/details/1791 |
url |
https://ggaging.com/details/1791 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.53886/gga.e0230027 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.17 n.0 2023 reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia instacron:SBGG |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
instacron_str |
SBGG |
institution |
SBGG |
reponame_str |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
collection |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br |
_version_ |
1797174503247183872 |