Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913
Resumo: This paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms.
id IBRASPP-1_8bd2e2f7bfc00e08fa5ea513f1ff3ee6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/913
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writingEditorial – Inteligência artificial e coautoria de trabalhos científicos: discussões sobre utilização de ChatGPT em pesquisa e redação científicaseditorialcoautoriainteligência artificialChatGPTchatbotsintegridade científicaeditoraçãoeditorialco-authorshipscientific integrityartificial intelligenceChatGPTchatbotseditingThis paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms.Este trabalho pretende analisar a utilização de ferramentas de inteligência artificial, como ChatGPT, na pesquisa e redação científicas e suas tensões com os requisitos de integridade em coautoria. Assim, almeja-se problematizar a temática e sugerir critérios para definição da coautoria em trabalhos científicos com o uso de ferramentas de inteligência artificial. Conclui-se que, diante do cenário atual, as revistas científicas devem inserir normas sobre a questão, recomendando-se os seguintes parâmetros: 1. mecanismos de inteligência artificial (como ChatGPT) não cumprem os requisitos para coautoria; 2. autore/as devem declarar (na metodologia ou nos agradecimentos) a utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial na redação do artigo e/ou nas demais fases da pesquisa científica; 3. autore/as são responsáveis por erros, plágios e outras más-práticas que eventualmente ocorram nas suas pesquisas em razão da utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/91310.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913/502Copyright (c) 2023 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcelloshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de2023-10-26T12:04:59Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/913Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-10-26T12:04:59Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
Editorial – Inteligência artificial e coautoria de trabalhos científicos: discussões sobre utilização de ChatGPT em pesquisa e redação científicas
title Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
spellingShingle Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de
editorial
coautoria
inteligência artificial
ChatGPT
chatbots
integridade científica
editoração
editorial
co-authorship
scientific integrity
artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
chatbots
editing
title_short Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
title_full Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
title_fullStr Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
title_full_unstemmed Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
title_sort Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
author Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de
author_facet Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv editorial
coautoria
inteligência artificial
ChatGPT
chatbots
integridade científica
editoração
editorial
co-authorship
scientific integrity
artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
chatbots
editing
topic editorial
coautoria
inteligência artificial
ChatGPT
chatbots
integridade científica
editoração
editorial
co-authorship
scientific integrity
artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
chatbots
editing
description This paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913/502
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941808087040