Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913 |
Resumo: | This paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_8bd2e2f7bfc00e08fa5ea513f1ff3ee6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/913 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writingEditorial – Inteligência artificial e coautoria de trabalhos científicos: discussões sobre utilização de ChatGPT em pesquisa e redação científicaseditorialcoautoriainteligência artificialChatGPTchatbotsintegridade científicaeditoraçãoeditorialco-authorshipscientific integrityartificial intelligenceChatGPTchatbotseditingThis paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms.Este trabalho pretende analisar a utilização de ferramentas de inteligência artificial, como ChatGPT, na pesquisa e redação científicas e suas tensões com os requisitos de integridade em coautoria. Assim, almeja-se problematizar a temática e sugerir critérios para definição da coautoria em trabalhos científicos com o uso de ferramentas de inteligência artificial. Conclui-se que, diante do cenário atual, as revistas científicas devem inserir normas sobre a questão, recomendando-se os seguintes parâmetros: 1. mecanismos de inteligência artificial (como ChatGPT) não cumprem os requisitos para coautoria; 2. autore/as devem declarar (na metodologia ou nos agradecimentos) a utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial na redação do artigo e/ou nas demais fases da pesquisa científica; 3. autore/as são responsáveis por erros, plágios e outras más-práticas que eventualmente ocorram nas suas pesquisas em razão da utilização de mecanismos de inteligência artificial.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/91310.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913/502Copyright (c) 2023 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcelloshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de2023-10-26T12:04:59Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/913Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-10-26T12:04:59Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing Editorial – Inteligência artificial e coautoria de trabalhos científicos: discussões sobre utilização de ChatGPT em pesquisa e redação científicas |
title |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing |
spellingShingle |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de editorial coautoria inteligência artificial ChatGPT chatbots integridade científica editoração editorial co-authorship scientific integrity artificial intelligence ChatGPT chatbots editing |
title_short |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing |
title_full |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing |
title_fullStr |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing |
title_sort |
Editorial – Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing |
author |
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de |
author_facet |
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
editorial coautoria inteligência artificial ChatGPT chatbots integridade científica editoração editorial co-authorship scientific integrity artificial intelligence ChatGPT chatbots editing |
topic |
editorial coautoria inteligência artificial ChatGPT chatbots integridade científica editoração editorial co-authorship scientific integrity artificial intelligence ChatGPT chatbots editing |
description |
This paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/913/502 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023) 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941808087040 |