Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Diniz,Lucas Rampazzo
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Garcia,Jessica Myrian de Amorim, Peixoto,Rafaella Italiano, Diniz,Keila Lima de Oliveira, Monteiro,Verônica Soares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/35
Resumo: <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Subjects suffering from acute coronary syndrome and lower glomerular filtration rates are associated with worse outcomes. Although many different formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rates were developed, it has not been well established which one is more powerful to predict outcomes in elderly subjects with acute coronary syndrome.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare three formulas for glomerular filtration rate in order to predict intra-hospital mortality and other outcomes.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> Intra-hospital retrospective cohort including elderly people with acute coronary syndrome, and who were admitted at an Intensive Care Unit of Cardiology between January 1<sup>st</sup> and December 31<sup>st</sup>, 2013. Cockcroft-gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI were used to calculate the glomerular filtration rate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> A hundred and twenty-two people were analyzed, 51.6% men, with a mean age of 73.5 years. The mortality was 19.6%. The mean glomerular filtration rates for Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI were, respectively, 70.24 mL/min. (± 33.35), 74.70 mL/min./1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (± 30.91), and 69.79 mL/min./1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (± 23.82). All formulas were associated with death (p<u>&lt;</u>0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.028 <i>versus</i> 0.028), use of antibiotics (p = 0.002 <i>versus</i> &lt; 0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.001), and hemodialysis (p <u>&lt;</u> 0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.003 <i>versus</i> 0.003). Using the ROC curve, the Cockcroft-Gault showed the highest predictive value (0.701 <i>versus </i>0.634 <i>versus</i> 0.639) and was the only one with statistical significance (95%CI 0.579 - 0.822, p = 0.006), for intra-hospital mortality.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The Cockcroft-Gault was the best formula to predict mortality.</p>
id SBGG_6bc27e4aaadfab91bad115ccd770cdda
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:35
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?elderly glomerular filtration rate acute coronary syndrome.<p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Subjects suffering from acute coronary syndrome and lower glomerular filtration rates are associated with worse outcomes. Although many different formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rates were developed, it has not been well established which one is more powerful to predict outcomes in elderly subjects with acute coronary syndrome.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare three formulas for glomerular filtration rate in order to predict intra-hospital mortality and other outcomes.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> Intra-hospital retrospective cohort including elderly people with acute coronary syndrome, and who were admitted at an Intensive Care Unit of Cardiology between January 1<sup>st</sup> and December 31<sup>st</sup>, 2013. Cockcroft-gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI were used to calculate the glomerular filtration rate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> A hundred and twenty-two people were analyzed, 51.6% men, with a mean age of 73.5 years. The mortality was 19.6%. The mean glomerular filtration rates for Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI were, respectively, 70.24 mL/min. (± 33.35), 74.70 mL/min./1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (± 30.91), and 69.79 mL/min./1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (± 23.82). All formulas were associated with death (p<u>&lt;</u>0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.028 <i>versus</i> 0.028), use of antibiotics (p = 0.002 <i>versus</i> &lt; 0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.001), and hemodialysis (p <u>&lt;</u> 0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.003 <i>versus</i> 0.003). Using the ROC curve, the Cockcroft-Gault showed the highest predictive value (0.701 <i>versus </i>0.634 <i>versus</i> 0.639) and was the only one with statistical significance (95%CI 0.579 - 0.822, p = 0.006), for intra-hospital mortality.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The Cockcroft-Gault was the best formula to predict mortality.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/35Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.9 n.1 2015reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Diniz,Lucas Rampazzo Garcia,Jessica Myrian de Amorim Peixoto,Rafaella Italiano Diniz,Keila Lima de Oliveira Monteiro,Verônica Soareseng2015-01-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:35Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2015-01-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
title Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
spellingShingle Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
Diniz,Lucas Rampazzo
elderly
glomerular filtration rate
acute coronary syndrome.
title_short Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
title_full Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
title_fullStr Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
title_full_unstemmed Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
title_sort Glomerular filtration in elderly with acute coronary syndrome: is Cockcroft-Gault the best method?
author Diniz,Lucas Rampazzo
author_facet Diniz,Lucas Rampazzo
Garcia,Jessica Myrian de Amorim
Peixoto,Rafaella Italiano
Diniz,Keila Lima de Oliveira
Monteiro,Verônica Soares
author_role author
author2 Garcia,Jessica Myrian de Amorim
Peixoto,Rafaella Italiano
Diniz,Keila Lima de Oliveira
Monteiro,Verônica Soares
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Diniz,Lucas Rampazzo
Garcia,Jessica Myrian de Amorim
Peixoto,Rafaella Italiano
Diniz,Keila Lima de Oliveira
Monteiro,Verônica Soares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv elderly
glomerular filtration rate
acute coronary syndrome.
topic elderly
glomerular filtration rate
acute coronary syndrome.
description <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Subjects suffering from acute coronary syndrome and lower glomerular filtration rates are associated with worse outcomes. Although many different formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rates were developed, it has not been well established which one is more powerful to predict outcomes in elderly subjects with acute coronary syndrome.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare three formulas for glomerular filtration rate in order to predict intra-hospital mortality and other outcomes.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> Intra-hospital retrospective cohort including elderly people with acute coronary syndrome, and who were admitted at an Intensive Care Unit of Cardiology between January 1<sup>st</sup> and December 31<sup>st</sup>, 2013. Cockcroft-gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI were used to calculate the glomerular filtration rate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> A hundred and twenty-two people were analyzed, 51.6% men, with a mean age of 73.5 years. The mortality was 19.6%. The mean glomerular filtration rates for Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD and CKD-EPI were, respectively, 70.24 mL/min. (± 33.35), 74.70 mL/min./1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (± 30.91), and 69.79 mL/min./1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (± 23.82). All formulas were associated with death (p<u>&lt;</u>0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.028 <i>versus</i> 0.028), use of antibiotics (p = 0.002 <i>versus</i> &lt; 0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.001), and hemodialysis (p <u>&lt;</u> 0.001 <i>versus</i> 0.003 <i>versus</i> 0.003). Using the ROC curve, the Cockcroft-Gault showed the highest predictive value (0.701 <i>versus </i>0.634 <i>versus</i> 0.639) and was the only one with statistical significance (95%CI 0.579 - 0.822, p = 0.006), for intra-hospital mortality.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The Cockcroft-Gault was the best formula to predict mortality.</p>
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/35
url https://ggaging.com/details/35
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.9 n.1 2015
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174500746330112