Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000200009 |
Resumo: | We evaluated the effectiveness of Selenite Cystine (SC), Tetrathionate Brilliant Green (TBG) and Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broths for Salmonella isolation. We also tested three classic plating media, Salmonella-Shigella Agar (SS), Brilliant Green Agar (BGA), Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate Agar (XLD) and two chromogenic agars, Rambach (RA) and CHROMagar Salmonella (CAS). Among 100 poultry carcasses, 29 were positive for Salmonella using all plating media combined. RV broth (69%) and TT broth (58.6%) were more effective than SC broth (24.1%). The chromogenic media gave better results than the classic ones with less false-positive colonies. The most effective isolation medium was CHROMagar, where Salmonella was identified in 23 (79.3%) of the 29 positive samples, followed by Rambach (48%). Positivity for Salmonella using classic media was 13.8% for BGA, 27.6% for SS and 34.5% for XLD. |
id |
SBM-1_84be4877b228b6c7f8b4a0193e51f998 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-83822005000200009 |
network_acronym_str |
SBM-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultrySalmonellapoultryplating mediaselective enrichmentWe evaluated the effectiveness of Selenite Cystine (SC), Tetrathionate Brilliant Green (TBG) and Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broths for Salmonella isolation. We also tested three classic plating media, Salmonella-Shigella Agar (SS), Brilliant Green Agar (BGA), Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate Agar (XLD) and two chromogenic agars, Rambach (RA) and CHROMagar Salmonella (CAS). Among 100 poultry carcasses, 29 were positive for Salmonella using all plating media combined. RV broth (69%) and TT broth (58.6%) were more effective than SC broth (24.1%). The chromogenic media gave better results than the classic ones with less false-positive colonies. The most effective isolation medium was CHROMagar, where Salmonella was identified in 23 (79.3%) of the 29 positive samples, followed by Rambach (48%). Positivity for Salmonella using classic media was 13.8% for BGA, 27.6% for SS and 34.5% for XLD.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2005-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000200009Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.36 n.2 2005reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1590/S1517-83822005000200009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRall,Vera Lúcia MoresRall,RicardoAragon,Lina CasaleSilva,Márcia Guimarães daeng2006-01-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822005000200009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2006-01-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
title |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry Rall,Vera Lúcia Mores Salmonella poultry plating media selective enrichment |
title_short |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
title_full |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
title_sort |
Evaluation of three enrichment broths and five plating media for Salmonella detection in poultry |
author |
Rall,Vera Lúcia Mores |
author_facet |
Rall,Vera Lúcia Mores Rall,Ricardo Aragon,Lina Casale Silva,Márcia Guimarães da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rall,Ricardo Aragon,Lina Casale Silva,Márcia Guimarães da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rall,Vera Lúcia Mores Rall,Ricardo Aragon,Lina Casale Silva,Márcia Guimarães da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Salmonella poultry plating media selective enrichment |
topic |
Salmonella poultry plating media selective enrichment |
description |
We evaluated the effectiveness of Selenite Cystine (SC), Tetrathionate Brilliant Green (TBG) and Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broths for Salmonella isolation. We also tested three classic plating media, Salmonella-Shigella Agar (SS), Brilliant Green Agar (BGA), Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate Agar (XLD) and two chromogenic agars, Rambach (RA) and CHROMagar Salmonella (CAS). Among 100 poultry carcasses, 29 were positive for Salmonella using all plating media combined. RV broth (69%) and TT broth (58.6%) were more effective than SC broth (24.1%). The chromogenic media gave better results than the classic ones with less false-positive colonies. The most effective isolation medium was CHROMagar, where Salmonella was identified in 23 (79.3%) of the 29 positive samples, followed by Rambach (48%). Positivity for Salmonella using classic media was 13.8% for BGA, 27.6% for SS and 34.5% for XLD. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000200009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000200009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-83822005000200009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.36 n.2 2005 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) instacron:SBM |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
instacron_str |
SBM |
institution |
SBM |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br |
_version_ |
1752122200208441344 |