Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo, Paiva, Sávio Oliveira, Caram, Diogo Fabrício, Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro, Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz, Sá, Marcus André Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
Texto Completo: https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162
Resumo: ABSTRACT. Silva P.C.A., Oliveira J.P., Sá M.A.F., Paiva S.O., Caram D.F., Junqueira R.G.C. & Jacob J.C.F. [Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares.] Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(Supl.2):45-48, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: paulinha_calmeida@hotmail.com Hormonal control of the ovulation is an effective tool to improve reproductive performance and reduce costs in equine breeding programs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of lower doses of hCG and Deslorelina than doses traditionally used, evaluating the follicular parameters and time between induction and ovulation. Induction of ovulation was performed according to the groups, 1000 IU of hCG (G1), 0.75mg of Deslorelin (G2), and 1.0ml of saline solution (G3). Twenty-four hours after administration, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound every six hours until detection of ovulation.  The percentage of ovulation within 36 hours was 34.4%, 13.3% and 8.7%, and up to 42 hours was 96.9%, 70% and 17.4% for G1, G2 and G3, respectively, showing a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) in G1 compared to other groups. In G2 there was a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) of ovulation after 42 hours from the induction, and G3 after 48 hours. Until 48 hours the percentage of induction of ovulation was 96.8% (31/32) 90% (27/30) and 30.4% (7/23), respectively, for G1, G2 and G3. Thus, the lower doses of ovulation-inducing drugs were effective in inducing ovulation within 48 hours, however hCG was faster than deslorelin, which might reduce costs and help the reproduction management.
id SBMV-1_07518b2b8d826baa38b8ac8fc47abbbb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/162
network_acronym_str SBMV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in maresComparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguasÉguaDeslorelinahCGMaresDeslorelinahCGABSTRACT. Silva P.C.A., Oliveira J.P., Sá M.A.F., Paiva S.O., Caram D.F., Junqueira R.G.C. & Jacob J.C.F. [Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares.] Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(Supl.2):45-48, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: paulinha_calmeida@hotmail.com Hormonal control of the ovulation is an effective tool to improve reproductive performance and reduce costs in equine breeding programs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of lower doses of hCG and Deslorelina than doses traditionally used, evaluating the follicular parameters and time between induction and ovulation. Induction of ovulation was performed according to the groups, 1000 IU of hCG (G1), 0.75mg of Deslorelin (G2), and 1.0ml of saline solution (G3). Twenty-four hours after administration, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound every six hours until detection of ovulation.  The percentage of ovulation within 36 hours was 34.4%, 13.3% and 8.7%, and up to 42 hours was 96.9%, 70% and 17.4% for G1, G2 and G3, respectively, showing a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) in G1 compared to other groups. In G2 there was a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) of ovulation after 42 hours from the induction, and G3 after 48 hours. Until 48 hours the percentage of induction of ovulation was 96.8% (31/32) 90% (27/30) and 30.4% (7/23), respectively, for G1, G2 and G3. Thus, the lower doses of ovulation-inducing drugs were effective in inducing ovulation within 48 hours, however hCG was faster than deslorelin, which might reduce costs and help the reproduction management.O controle hormonal do momento da ovulação é uma ferramenta eficaz para otimizar os parâmetros reprodutivos e reduzir os custos em programas de reprodução em equinos. O presente estudo comparou a eficiência de doses mais baixas do que as tradicionalmente utilizadas de hCG e Deslorelina avaliando os parâmetros foliculares e o tempo entre a indução e a ovulação. A indu- ção da ovulação foi realizada com 1000UI de hCG (G1), 0,75mg de Deslorelina (G2), e 1,0ml de Solu- ção salina (G3). Vinte quatro horas após a aplica- ção, a avaliação ultrassonográfica dos ovários passou a ser realizada a cada seis horas até a detecção da ovulação. O percentual de ovulação em até 36 horas foi de 34,4%, 13,3% e 8,7%, e em até 42 horas foi de 96,9%, 70% e 17,4%, para o G1, G2 e G3, respectivamente, demonstrando um aumento significativo (p < 0,0001) no G1 em relação aos outros grupos. No G2 houve um aumento significativo (p < 0,0001) das ovulações após 42 horas da indução, e no G3 após 48 horas. Até 48 horas após a indução o percentual de ovulações foi de 96,8% (31/32), 90% (27/30) e 30,4% (7/23), para os respectivos, G1, G2 e G3. Deste modo as doses inferiores dos agentes indutores, foram eficientes em promover a ovula- ção em até 48 horas, sendo o efeito da hCG mais rápido que a Deslorelina, o que reduz os custos e auxilia no manejo reprodutivo.Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.2016-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpeer reviewedAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 38 No. Supl.2 (2016); 45-48Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 38 n. Supl.2 (2016); 45-482527-21790100-2430reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicineinstname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)instacron:SBMVporhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162/102Silva, Paula Cardoso de AlmeidaOliveira, Jhonnatha PauloPaiva, Sávio OliveiraCaram, Diogo FabrícioJunqueira, Renato Guerra de CastroJacob, Julio Cesar FerrazSá, Marcus André Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-23T17:34:13Zoai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/162Revistahttps://rbmv.org/BJVMONGhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/oaicontato.rbmv@gmail.com2527-21790100-2430opendoar:2020-12-23T17:34:13Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas
title Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
spellingShingle Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida
Égua
Deslorelina
hCG
Mares
Deslorelina
hCG
title_short Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
title_full Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
title_fullStr Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
title_sort Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
author Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida
author_facet Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida
Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo
Paiva, Sávio Oliveira
Caram, Diogo Fabrício
Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro
Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz
Sá, Marcus André Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo
Paiva, Sávio Oliveira
Caram, Diogo Fabrício
Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro
Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz
Sá, Marcus André Ferreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida
Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo
Paiva, Sávio Oliveira
Caram, Diogo Fabrício
Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro
Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz
Sá, Marcus André Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Égua
Deslorelina
hCG
Mares
Deslorelina
hCG
topic Égua
Deslorelina
hCG
Mares
Deslorelina
hCG
description ABSTRACT. Silva P.C.A., Oliveira J.P., Sá M.A.F., Paiva S.O., Caram D.F., Junqueira R.G.C. & Jacob J.C.F. [Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares.] Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(Supl.2):45-48, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: paulinha_calmeida@hotmail.com Hormonal control of the ovulation is an effective tool to improve reproductive performance and reduce costs in equine breeding programs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of lower doses of hCG and Deslorelina than doses traditionally used, evaluating the follicular parameters and time between induction and ovulation. Induction of ovulation was performed according to the groups, 1000 IU of hCG (G1), 0.75mg of Deslorelin (G2), and 1.0ml of saline solution (G3). Twenty-four hours after administration, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound every six hours until detection of ovulation.  The percentage of ovulation within 36 hours was 34.4%, 13.3% and 8.7%, and up to 42 hours was 96.9%, 70% and 17.4% for G1, G2 and G3, respectively, showing a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) in G1 compared to other groups. In G2 there was a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) of ovulation after 42 hours from the induction, and G3 after 48 hours. Until 48 hours the percentage of induction of ovulation was 96.8% (31/32) 90% (27/30) and 30.4% (7/23), respectively, for G1, G2 and G3. Thus, the lower doses of ovulation-inducing drugs were effective in inducing ovulation within 48 hours, however hCG was faster than deslorelin, which might reduce costs and help the reproduction management.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
peer reviewed
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162
url https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162/102
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 38 No. Supl.2 (2016); 45-48
Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 38 n. Supl.2 (2016); 45-48
2527-2179
0100-2430
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
instname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron:SBMV
instname_str Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron_str SBMV
institution SBMV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato.rbmv@gmail.com
_version_ 1798313106877710336