Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine |
Texto Completo: | https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT. Silva P.C.A., Oliveira J.P., Sá M.A.F., Paiva S.O., Caram D.F., Junqueira R.G.C. & Jacob J.C.F. [Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares.] Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(Supl.2):45-48, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: paulinha_calmeida@hotmail.com Hormonal control of the ovulation is an effective tool to improve reproductive performance and reduce costs in equine breeding programs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of lower doses of hCG and Deslorelina than doses traditionally used, evaluating the follicular parameters and time between induction and ovulation. Induction of ovulation was performed according to the groups, 1000 IU of hCG (G1), 0.75mg of Deslorelin (G2), and 1.0ml of saline solution (G3). Twenty-four hours after administration, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound every six hours until detection of ovulation. The percentage of ovulation within 36 hours was 34.4%, 13.3% and 8.7%, and up to 42 hours was 96.9%, 70% and 17.4% for G1, G2 and G3, respectively, showing a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) in G1 compared to other groups. In G2 there was a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) of ovulation after 42 hours from the induction, and G3 after 48 hours. Until 48 hours the percentage of induction of ovulation was 96.8% (31/32) 90% (27/30) and 30.4% (7/23), respectively, for G1, G2 and G3. Thus, the lower doses of ovulation-inducing drugs were effective in inducing ovulation within 48 hours, however hCG was faster than deslorelin, which might reduce costs and help the reproduction management. |
id |
SBMV-1_07518b2b8d826baa38b8ac8fc47abbbb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/162 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMV-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in maresComparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguasÉguaDeslorelinahCGMaresDeslorelinahCGABSTRACT. Silva P.C.A., Oliveira J.P., Sá M.A.F., Paiva S.O., Caram D.F., Junqueira R.G.C. & Jacob J.C.F. [Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares.] Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(Supl.2):45-48, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: paulinha_calmeida@hotmail.com Hormonal control of the ovulation is an effective tool to improve reproductive performance and reduce costs in equine breeding programs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of lower doses of hCG and Deslorelina than doses traditionally used, evaluating the follicular parameters and time between induction and ovulation. Induction of ovulation was performed according to the groups, 1000 IU of hCG (G1), 0.75mg of Deslorelin (G2), and 1.0ml of saline solution (G3). Twenty-four hours after administration, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound every six hours until detection of ovulation. The percentage of ovulation within 36 hours was 34.4%, 13.3% and 8.7%, and up to 42 hours was 96.9%, 70% and 17.4% for G1, G2 and G3, respectively, showing a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) in G1 compared to other groups. In G2 there was a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) of ovulation after 42 hours from the induction, and G3 after 48 hours. Until 48 hours the percentage of induction of ovulation was 96.8% (31/32) 90% (27/30) and 30.4% (7/23), respectively, for G1, G2 and G3. Thus, the lower doses of ovulation-inducing drugs were effective in inducing ovulation within 48 hours, however hCG was faster than deslorelin, which might reduce costs and help the reproduction management.O controle hormonal do momento da ovulação é uma ferramenta eficaz para otimizar os parâmetros reprodutivos e reduzir os custos em programas de reprodução em equinos. O presente estudo comparou a eficiência de doses mais baixas do que as tradicionalmente utilizadas de hCG e Deslorelina avaliando os parâmetros foliculares e o tempo entre a indução e a ovulação. A indu- ção da ovulação foi realizada com 1000UI de hCG (G1), 0,75mg de Deslorelina (G2), e 1,0ml de Solu- ção salina (G3). Vinte quatro horas após a aplica- ção, a avaliação ultrassonográfica dos ovários passou a ser realizada a cada seis horas até a detecção da ovulação. O percentual de ovulação em até 36 horas foi de 34,4%, 13,3% e 8,7%, e em até 42 horas foi de 96,9%, 70% e 17,4%, para o G1, G2 e G3, respectivamente, demonstrando um aumento significativo (p < 0,0001) no G1 em relação aos outros grupos. No G2 houve um aumento significativo (p < 0,0001) das ovulações após 42 horas da indução, e no G3 após 48 horas. Até 48 horas após a indução o percentual de ovulações foi de 96,8% (31/32), 90% (27/30) e 30,4% (7/23), para os respectivos, G1, G2 e G3. Deste modo as doses inferiores dos agentes indutores, foram eficientes em promover a ovula- ção em até 48 horas, sendo o efeito da hCG mais rápido que a Deslorelina, o que reduz os custos e auxilia no manejo reprodutivo.Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.2016-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpeer reviewedAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 38 No. Supl.2 (2016); 45-48Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 38 n. Supl.2 (2016); 45-482527-21790100-2430reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicineinstname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)instacron:SBMVporhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162/102Silva, Paula Cardoso de AlmeidaOliveira, Jhonnatha PauloPaiva, Sávio OliveiraCaram, Diogo FabrícioJunqueira, Renato Guerra de CastroJacob, Julio Cesar FerrazSá, Marcus André Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-23T17:34:13Zoai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/162Revistahttps://rbmv.org/BJVMONGhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/oaicontato.rbmv@gmail.com2527-21790100-2430opendoar:2020-12-23T17:34:13Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas |
title |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida Égua Deslorelina hCG Mares Deslorelina hCG |
title_short |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares |
title_full |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares |
title_sort |
Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares |
author |
Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida |
author_facet |
Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo Paiva, Sávio Oliveira Caram, Diogo Fabrício Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz Sá, Marcus André Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo Paiva, Sávio Oliveira Caram, Diogo Fabrício Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz Sá, Marcus André Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Paula Cardoso de Almeida Oliveira, Jhonnatha Paulo Paiva, Sávio Oliveira Caram, Diogo Fabrício Junqueira, Renato Guerra de Castro Jacob, Julio Cesar Ferraz Sá, Marcus André Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Égua Deslorelina hCG Mares Deslorelina hCG |
topic |
Égua Deslorelina hCG Mares Deslorelina hCG |
description |
ABSTRACT. Silva P.C.A., Oliveira J.P., Sá M.A.F., Paiva S.O., Caram D.F., Junqueira R.G.C. & Jacob J.C.F. [Comparison between two ovulation-inducing drugs in mares.] Comparação entre dois agentes indutores da ovulação em éguas. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(Supl.2):45-48, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: paulinha_calmeida@hotmail.com Hormonal control of the ovulation is an effective tool to improve reproductive performance and reduce costs in equine breeding programs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of lower doses of hCG and Deslorelina than doses traditionally used, evaluating the follicular parameters and time between induction and ovulation. Induction of ovulation was performed according to the groups, 1000 IU of hCG (G1), 0.75mg of Deslorelin (G2), and 1.0ml of saline solution (G3). Twenty-four hours after administration, ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound every six hours until detection of ovulation. The percentage of ovulation within 36 hours was 34.4%, 13.3% and 8.7%, and up to 42 hours was 96.9%, 70% and 17.4% for G1, G2 and G3, respectively, showing a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) in G1 compared to other groups. In G2 there was a significant increase (p ˂ 0.0001) of ovulation after 42 hours from the induction, and G3 after 48 hours. Until 48 hours the percentage of induction of ovulation was 96.8% (31/32) 90% (27/30) and 30.4% (7/23), respectively, for G1, G2 and G3. Thus, the lower doses of ovulation-inducing drugs were effective in inducing ovulation within 48 hours, however hCG was faster than deslorelin, which might reduce costs and help the reproduction management. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion peer reviewed Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162 |
url |
https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/162/102 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 38 No. Supl.2 (2016); 45-48 Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 38 n. Supl.2 (2016); 45-48 2527-2179 0100-2430 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine instname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ) instacron:SBMV |
instname_str |
Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ) |
instacron_str |
SBMV |
institution |
SBMV |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato.rbmv@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798313106877710336 |