Export Ready — 

Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinto,Gabriel Godinho
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Poloni,Jose Antonio T, Rotta,Liane N., Razonable,Raymund R., Pasqualotto,Alessandro C.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002016000300356
Summary: Abstract Urine cytology and qPCR in blood and urine are commonly used to screen renal transplant recipients for polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Few studies, however, have directly compared these two diagnostic tests, in terms of their performance to predict PVAN. This was a systematic review in which adult (≥ 18 years old) renal transplant recipients were studied. A structured Pubmed search was used to identify studies comparing urine cytology and/or qPCR in urine and plasma samples for detecting PVAN with renal biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis. From 707 potential papers, there were only twelve articles that matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. Among 1694 renal transplant recipients that were included in the review, there were 115 (6.8%) patients with presumptive PVAN and 57 (3.4%) PVAN confirmed. In this systematic review, the qPCR in plasma had better performance for PVAN compared to urine cytopathology.
id SBN-1_6d75607c5e5a874c4d6f8c9cb6527e2e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-28002016000300356
network_acronym_str SBN-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
repository_id_str
spelling Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic testsbiopsyBK viruscell biologyDNAkidney transplantationAbstract Urine cytology and qPCR in blood and urine are commonly used to screen renal transplant recipients for polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Few studies, however, have directly compared these two diagnostic tests, in terms of their performance to predict PVAN. This was a systematic review in which adult (≥ 18 years old) renal transplant recipients were studied. A structured Pubmed search was used to identify studies comparing urine cytology and/or qPCR in urine and plasma samples for detecting PVAN with renal biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis. From 707 potential papers, there were only twelve articles that matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. Among 1694 renal transplant recipients that were included in the review, there were 115 (6.8%) patients with presumptive PVAN and 57 (3.4%) PVAN confirmed. In this systematic review, the qPCR in plasma had better performance for PVAN compared to urine cytopathology.Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002016000300356Brazilian Journal of Nephrology v.38 n.3 2016reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologiainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)instacron:SBN10.5935/0101-2800.20160054info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto,Gabriel GodinhoPoloni,Jose Antonio TRotta,Liane N.Razonable,Raymund R.Pasqualotto,Alessandro C.eng2016-10-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-28002016000300356Revistahttp://www.bjn.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbn@sbn.org.br2175-82390101-2800opendoar:2016-10-04T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia - Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
title Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
spellingShingle Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
Pinto,Gabriel Godinho
biopsy
BK virus
cell biology
DNA
kidney transplantation
title_short Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
title_full Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
title_fullStr Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
title_full_unstemmed Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
title_sort Screening for BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of diagnostic tests
author Pinto,Gabriel Godinho
author_facet Pinto,Gabriel Godinho
Poloni,Jose Antonio T
Rotta,Liane N.
Razonable,Raymund R.
Pasqualotto,Alessandro C.
author_role author
author2 Poloni,Jose Antonio T
Rotta,Liane N.
Razonable,Raymund R.
Pasqualotto,Alessandro C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto,Gabriel Godinho
Poloni,Jose Antonio T
Rotta,Liane N.
Razonable,Raymund R.
Pasqualotto,Alessandro C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biopsy
BK virus
cell biology
DNA
kidney transplantation
topic biopsy
BK virus
cell biology
DNA
kidney transplantation
description Abstract Urine cytology and qPCR in blood and urine are commonly used to screen renal transplant recipients for polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Few studies, however, have directly compared these two diagnostic tests, in terms of their performance to predict PVAN. This was a systematic review in which adult (≥ 18 years old) renal transplant recipients were studied. A structured Pubmed search was used to identify studies comparing urine cytology and/or qPCR in urine and plasma samples for detecting PVAN with renal biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis. From 707 potential papers, there were only twelve articles that matched the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. Among 1694 renal transplant recipients that were included in the review, there were 115 (6.8%) patients with presumptive PVAN and 57 (3.4%) PVAN confirmed. In this systematic review, the qPCR in plasma had better performance for PVAN compared to urine cytopathology.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002016000300356
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002016000300356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/0101-2800.20160054
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Nephrology v.38 n.3 2016
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)
instacron:SBN
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)
instacron_str SBN
institution SBN
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia - Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbn@sbn.org.br
_version_ 1752122064192405504