Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli, Souza,Fernando José de, Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto, Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483
Resumo: Abstract A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency.
id SBOT-2_8b1c02cfd02f7849f557d3ff7ed62fa1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162019000500483
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazilshoulderevaluation of results of therapeutic interventionsshoulder dislocation/surgeryAbstract A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.54 n.5 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rbo.2017.12.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssunção,Jorge HenriqueMalavolta,Eduardo AngeliSouza,Fernando José deGracitelli,Mauro Emilio ConfortoFerreira Neto,Arnaldo Amadoeng2019-11-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162019000500483Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2019-11-12T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
title Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
spellingShingle Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
Assunção,Jorge Henrique
shoulder
evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
shoulder dislocation/surgery
title_short Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
title_full Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
title_fullStr Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
title_sort Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
author Assunção,Jorge Henrique
author_facet Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Souza,Fernando José de
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
author_role author
author2 Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Souza,Fernando José de
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Souza,Fernando José de
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv shoulder
evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
shoulder dislocation/surgery
topic shoulder
evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
shoulder dislocation/surgery
description Abstract A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rbo.2017.12.006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.54 n.5 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122362007912448