Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483 |
Resumo: | Abstract A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency. |
id |
SBOT-2_8b1c02cfd02f7849f557d3ff7ed62fa1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162019000500483 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazilshoulderevaluation of results of therapeutic interventionsshoulder dislocation/surgeryAbstract A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.54 n.5 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rbo.2017.12.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssunção,Jorge HenriqueMalavolta,Eduardo AngeliSouza,Fernando José deGracitelli,Mauro Emilio ConfortoFerreira Neto,Arnaldo Amadoeng2019-11-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162019000500483Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2019-11-12T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
title |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil Assunção,Jorge Henrique shoulder evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions shoulder dislocation/surgery |
title_short |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
title_full |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
title_sort |
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Systematic Review of Outcomes Assessment Used in Brazil |
author |
Assunção,Jorge Henrique |
author_facet |
Assunção,Jorge Henrique Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli Souza,Fernando José de Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli Souza,Fernando José de Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assunção,Jorge Henrique Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli Souza,Fernando José de Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
shoulder evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions shoulder dislocation/surgery |
topic |
shoulder evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions shoulder dislocation/surgery |
description |
Abstract A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000500483 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rbo.2017.12.006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.54 n.5 2019 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122362007912448 |