The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600695 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective Compare by mechanical tests the pullout resistance and the insertion torque of rough and smooth pedicle screws. Methods Pedicle screws with rough surface and smooth surface, with diameters of 4.8; 5.5 and 6.5 mm, were inserted in polyurethane blocks with density of 10 PCF (0.16 g/cm3). Insertion torque and pullout strength were assessed. Results The pullout strength of the rough surface and smooth surface screws did not differ, except in the group of 4.8 mm diameter screws. In this group, the rough surface screws showed greater resistance to pullout. Conclusion Pedicle screws with a rough surface did not show increased pullout resistance in the acute phase of their insertion in polyurethane blocks compared to smooth surface screws. The rough surface screws had a higher insertion torque than the smooth surface screws, depending on the diameter of the screw and the preparation of the pilot hole. |
id |
SBOT-2_fb2bca79b9b1327e3fb20bb602eb258e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162020000600695 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strengthspinebone screwsbiomechanical phenomenaAbstract Objective Compare by mechanical tests the pullout resistance and the insertion torque of rough and smooth pedicle screws. Methods Pedicle screws with rough surface and smooth surface, with diameters of 4.8; 5.5 and 6.5 mm, were inserted in polyurethane blocks with density of 10 PCF (0.16 g/cm3). Insertion torque and pullout strength were assessed. Results The pullout strength of the rough surface and smooth surface screws did not differ, except in the group of 4.8 mm diameter screws. In this group, the rough surface screws showed greater resistance to pullout. Conclusion Pedicle screws with a rough surface did not show increased pullout resistance in the acute phase of their insertion in polyurethane blocks compared to smooth surface screws. The rough surface screws had a higher insertion torque than the smooth surface screws, depending on the diameter of the screw and the preparation of the pilot hole.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600695Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.55 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0040-1710072info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFleury,Rodrigo Barra CaiadoShimano,Antônio CarlosMatos,Thiago DantasTeixeira,Kelsen de OliveiraRomero,ValériaDefino,Helton Luiz Aparecidoeng2021-02-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162020000600695Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2021-02-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
title |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
spellingShingle |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength Fleury,Rodrigo Barra Caiado spine bone screws biomechanical phenomena |
title_short |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
title_full |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
title_fullStr |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
title_sort |
The Role of Pedicle Screw Surface on Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength |
author |
Fleury,Rodrigo Barra Caiado |
author_facet |
Fleury,Rodrigo Barra Caiado Shimano,Antônio Carlos Matos,Thiago Dantas Teixeira,Kelsen de Oliveira Romero,Valéria Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shimano,Antônio Carlos Matos,Thiago Dantas Teixeira,Kelsen de Oliveira Romero,Valéria Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fleury,Rodrigo Barra Caiado Shimano,Antônio Carlos Matos,Thiago Dantas Teixeira,Kelsen de Oliveira Romero,Valéria Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
spine bone screws biomechanical phenomena |
topic |
spine bone screws biomechanical phenomena |
description |
Abstract Objective Compare by mechanical tests the pullout resistance and the insertion torque of rough and smooth pedicle screws. Methods Pedicle screws with rough surface and smooth surface, with diameters of 4.8; 5.5 and 6.5 mm, were inserted in polyurethane blocks with density of 10 PCF (0.16 g/cm3). Insertion torque and pullout strength were assessed. Results The pullout strength of the rough surface and smooth surface screws did not differ, except in the group of 4.8 mm diameter screws. In this group, the rough surface screws showed greater resistance to pullout. Conclusion Pedicle screws with a rough surface did not show increased pullout resistance in the acute phase of their insertion in polyurethane blocks compared to smooth surface screws. The rough surface screws had a higher insertion torque than the smooth surface screws, depending on the diameter of the screw and the preparation of the pilot hole. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600695 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600695 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0040-1710072 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.55 n.6 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122362762887168 |