Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Au,Cheuk C.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Branco,Ricardo G., Tasker,Robert C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572017000700084
Resumo: Abstract Objective: This systematic review of national or regional guidelines published in English aimed to better understand variance in pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of status epilepticus. Sources: Systematic search of national or regional guidelines (January 2000 to February 2017) contained within PubMed and Google Scholar databases, and article reference lists. The search keywords were status epilepticus, prolonged seizure, treatment, and guideline. Summary of findings: 356 articles were retrieved and 13 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. In all six pre-hospital guidelines, the preferred route of medication administration was to use alternatives to the intravenous route: all recommended buccal and intranasal midazolam; three also recommended intramuscular midazolam, and five recommended using rectal diazepam. All 11 emergency department guidelines described three phases in therapy. Intravenous medication, by phase, was indicated as such: initial phase - ten/11 guidelines recommended lorazepam, and eight/11 recommended diazepam; second phase - most (ten/11) guidelines recommended phenytoin, but other options were phenobarbital (nine/11), valproic acid (six/11), and either fosphenytoin or levetiracetam (each four/11); third phase - four/11 guidelines included the choice of repeating second phase therapy, whereas the other guidelines recommended using a variety of intravenous anesthetic agents (thiopental, midazolam, propofol, and pentobarbital). Conclusions: All of the guidelines share a similar framework for management of status epilepticus. The choice in route of administration and drug type varied across guidelines. Hence, the adoption of a particular guideline should take account of local practice options in health service delivery.
id SBPE-1_438a29eccc505940bd7a0b75a5e45439
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572017000700084
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review articleStatus epilepticusSeizureProtocolGuidelineAbstract Objective: This systematic review of national or regional guidelines published in English aimed to better understand variance in pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of status epilepticus. Sources: Systematic search of national or regional guidelines (January 2000 to February 2017) contained within PubMed and Google Scholar databases, and article reference lists. The search keywords were status epilepticus, prolonged seizure, treatment, and guideline. Summary of findings: 356 articles were retrieved and 13 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. In all six pre-hospital guidelines, the preferred route of medication administration was to use alternatives to the intravenous route: all recommended buccal and intranasal midazolam; three also recommended intramuscular midazolam, and five recommended using rectal diazepam. All 11 emergency department guidelines described three phases in therapy. Intravenous medication, by phase, was indicated as such: initial phase - ten/11 guidelines recommended lorazepam, and eight/11 recommended diazepam; second phase - most (ten/11) guidelines recommended phenytoin, but other options were phenobarbital (nine/11), valproic acid (six/11), and either fosphenytoin or levetiracetam (each four/11); third phase - four/11 guidelines included the choice of repeating second phase therapy, whereas the other guidelines recommended using a variety of intravenous anesthetic agents (thiopental, midazolam, propofol, and pentobarbital). Conclusions: All of the guidelines share a similar framework for management of status epilepticus. The choice in route of administration and drug type varied across guidelines. Hence, the adoption of a particular guideline should take account of local practice options in health service delivery.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572017000700084Jornal de Pediatria v.93 suppl.1 2017reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2017.08.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAu,Cheuk C.Branco,Ricardo G.Tasker,Robert C.eng2017-12-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572017000700084Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2017-12-08T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
title Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
spellingShingle Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
Au,Cheuk C.
Status epilepticus
Seizure
Protocol
Guideline
title_short Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
title_full Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
title_fullStr Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
title_full_unstemmed Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
title_sort Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article
author Au,Cheuk C.
author_facet Au,Cheuk C.
Branco,Ricardo G.
Tasker,Robert C.
author_role author
author2 Branco,Ricardo G.
Tasker,Robert C.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Au,Cheuk C.
Branco,Ricardo G.
Tasker,Robert C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Status epilepticus
Seizure
Protocol
Guideline
topic Status epilepticus
Seizure
Protocol
Guideline
description Abstract Objective: This systematic review of national or regional guidelines published in English aimed to better understand variance in pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of status epilepticus. Sources: Systematic search of national or regional guidelines (January 2000 to February 2017) contained within PubMed and Google Scholar databases, and article reference lists. The search keywords were status epilepticus, prolonged seizure, treatment, and guideline. Summary of findings: 356 articles were retrieved and 13 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. In all six pre-hospital guidelines, the preferred route of medication administration was to use alternatives to the intravenous route: all recommended buccal and intranasal midazolam; three also recommended intramuscular midazolam, and five recommended using rectal diazepam. All 11 emergency department guidelines described three phases in therapy. Intravenous medication, by phase, was indicated as such: initial phase - ten/11 guidelines recommended lorazepam, and eight/11 recommended diazepam; second phase - most (ten/11) guidelines recommended phenytoin, but other options were phenobarbital (nine/11), valproic acid (six/11), and either fosphenytoin or levetiracetam (each four/11); third phase - four/11 guidelines included the choice of repeating second phase therapy, whereas the other guidelines recommended using a variety of intravenous anesthetic agents (thiopental, midazolam, propofol, and pentobarbital). Conclusions: All of the guidelines share a similar framework for management of status epilepticus. The choice in route of administration and drug type varied across guidelines. Hence, the adoption of a particular guideline should take account of local practice options in health service delivery.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572017000700084
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572017000700084
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2017.08.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.93 suppl.1 2017
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122321326309376