A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ARTAS,Gokhan
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: GUL,Mehmet, ACIKAN,Izzet, KIRTAY,Mustafa, BOZOGLAN,Alihan, SIMSEK,Sercan, YAMAN,Ferhan, DUNDAR,Serkan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100250
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the effects of hydroxyapatite (HA), deproteinized bovine bone (DPB), human-derived allogenic bone (HALG), and calcium sulfate (CAP) graft biomaterials used with titanium barriers for bone augmentation to treat peri-implant defects in rat calvarium treated by guided bone regeneration (GBR). Thirty-two female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: DPB, HALG, HA, and CAP. One titanium barrier was fixed to each rat’s calvarium after the titanium implants had been fixed. In total, 32 titanium implants and barriers were used. Ninety days after the surgical procedure, all the barriers were removed. After decalcification of bone tissue, the titanium implants were removed gently, and new bone regeneration in the peri-implant area was analyzed histologically. Immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was also performed. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in new bone regeneration or VEGF expression after 3 months. According to the results of the histological and immunohistochemical analyses, none of the grafts used in this study showed superiority with respect to new bone formation.
id SBPQO-1_428dff341754e810e110a6001a7bf8fc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100250
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regenerationBone RegenerationDurapatiteHydroxyapatitesCalcium SulfateAbstract The aim of this study was to compare the effects of hydroxyapatite (HA), deproteinized bovine bone (DPB), human-derived allogenic bone (HALG), and calcium sulfate (CAP) graft biomaterials used with titanium barriers for bone augmentation to treat peri-implant defects in rat calvarium treated by guided bone regeneration (GBR). Thirty-two female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: DPB, HALG, HA, and CAP. One titanium barrier was fixed to each rat’s calvarium after the titanium implants had been fixed. In total, 32 titanium implants and barriers were used. Ninety days after the surgical procedure, all the barriers were removed. After decalcification of bone tissue, the titanium implants were removed gently, and new bone regeneration in the peri-implant area was analyzed histologically. Immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was also performed. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in new bone regeneration or VEGF expression after 3 months. According to the results of the histological and immunohistochemical analyses, none of the grafts used in this study showed superiority with respect to new bone formation.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100250Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0059info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessARTAS,GokhanGUL,MehmetACIKAN,IzzetKIRTAY,MustafaBOZOGLAN,AlihanSIMSEK,SercanYAMAN,FerhanDUNDAR,Serkaneng2018-07-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100250Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-07-05T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
title A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
spellingShingle A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
ARTAS,Gokhan
Bone Regeneration
Durapatite
Hydroxyapatites
Calcium Sulfate
title_short A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
title_full A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
title_fullStr A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
title_sort A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
author ARTAS,Gokhan
author_facet ARTAS,Gokhan
GUL,Mehmet
ACIKAN,Izzet
KIRTAY,Mustafa
BOZOGLAN,Alihan
SIMSEK,Sercan
YAMAN,Ferhan
DUNDAR,Serkan
author_role author
author2 GUL,Mehmet
ACIKAN,Izzet
KIRTAY,Mustafa
BOZOGLAN,Alihan
SIMSEK,Sercan
YAMAN,Ferhan
DUNDAR,Serkan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ARTAS,Gokhan
GUL,Mehmet
ACIKAN,Izzet
KIRTAY,Mustafa
BOZOGLAN,Alihan
SIMSEK,Sercan
YAMAN,Ferhan
DUNDAR,Serkan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone Regeneration
Durapatite
Hydroxyapatites
Calcium Sulfate
topic Bone Regeneration
Durapatite
Hydroxyapatites
Calcium Sulfate
description Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the effects of hydroxyapatite (HA), deproteinized bovine bone (DPB), human-derived allogenic bone (HALG), and calcium sulfate (CAP) graft biomaterials used with titanium barriers for bone augmentation to treat peri-implant defects in rat calvarium treated by guided bone regeneration (GBR). Thirty-two female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: DPB, HALG, HA, and CAP. One titanium barrier was fixed to each rat’s calvarium after the titanium implants had been fixed. In total, 32 titanium implants and barriers were used. Ninety days after the surgical procedure, all the barriers were removed. After decalcification of bone tissue, the titanium implants were removed gently, and new bone regeneration in the peri-implant area was analyzed histologically. Immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was also performed. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in new bone regeneration or VEGF expression after 3 months. According to the results of the histological and immunohistochemical analyses, none of the grafts used in this study showed superiority with respect to new bone formation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100250
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100250
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0059
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318325782544384

Registros relacionados