Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: DAL PIVA,Amanda Maria de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: BARCELLOS,Aline Serrado de Pinho, BOTTINO,Marco Antonio, SOUZA,Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e, MELO,Renata Marques de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100284
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study was to determine if multiple processing (heat-pressing) of a dental ceramic influences flexural strength, hardness, and microstructure. Ninety bar-shaped specimens (15 mm × 4 mm × 2 mm) of a pressed ceramic (Vita PM9) were fabricated and randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 15) according to the factors “number of pressings” (C1, C2, and C3, fired 1, 2, and 3 times, respectively) and “mechanical cycling” (M). Half of the specimens were mechanically cycled (106 cycles, 45 N, 3.4 Hz, in water) and all specimens were tested for 3-point bending (0.5 mm/min, load 1000 kgf) and Vickers hardness (19.6 N for 20 s). X-ray diffraction was used to characterize the phases and scanning electron microscopy to characterize the microstructure. The flexural strength data was statistically analyzed with Weibull analysis, ANOVA, and Tukey test. Hardness data was evaluated by 2-way ANOVA and Fisher test. All tests were performed with a significance level of 0.05. Two-way ANOVA revealed that neither “number of pressings” (p=0.085) or “mechanical cycling” (0.055) significantly affected flexural strength. But Weibull analysis showed significant difference for Weibull moduli and characteristic strength between groups. For hardness, a statistical difference was seen for the interaction “Number of pressings * Mechanical cycling”, (p = 0.016). Hardness decreased in the following order: C1 (775±17.2), CM3 (751±101), CM2 (735±45), C3 (701±82), CM1 (671±82), and C2 (663±92). Fewer defects were observed with an increased number of firings. Therefore, the possibility of recycling PM9 ceramic does not interfere in the evaluated mechanical properties and improves microstructure.
id SBPQO-1_64741b43fd4bba21d23a4081929cdbe5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100284
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?RecyclingCeramicsStress, MechanicalHardnessAbstract The aim of this study was to determine if multiple processing (heat-pressing) of a dental ceramic influences flexural strength, hardness, and microstructure. Ninety bar-shaped specimens (15 mm × 4 mm × 2 mm) of a pressed ceramic (Vita PM9) were fabricated and randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 15) according to the factors “number of pressings” (C1, C2, and C3, fired 1, 2, and 3 times, respectively) and “mechanical cycling” (M). Half of the specimens were mechanically cycled (106 cycles, 45 N, 3.4 Hz, in water) and all specimens were tested for 3-point bending (0.5 mm/min, load 1000 kgf) and Vickers hardness (19.6 N for 20 s). X-ray diffraction was used to characterize the phases and scanning electron microscopy to characterize the microstructure. The flexural strength data was statistically analyzed with Weibull analysis, ANOVA, and Tukey test. Hardness data was evaluated by 2-way ANOVA and Fisher test. All tests were performed with a significance level of 0.05. Two-way ANOVA revealed that neither “number of pressings” (p=0.085) or “mechanical cycling” (0.055) significantly affected flexural strength. But Weibull analysis showed significant difference for Weibull moduli and characteristic strength between groups. For hardness, a statistical difference was seen for the interaction “Number of pressings * Mechanical cycling”, (p = 0.016). Hardness decreased in the following order: C1 (775±17.2), CM3 (751±101), CM2 (735±45), C3 (701±82), CM1 (671±82), and C2 (663±92). Fewer defects were observed with an increased number of firings. Therefore, the possibility of recycling PM9 ceramic does not interfere in the evaluated mechanical properties and improves microstructure.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100284Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0106info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDAL PIVA,Amanda Maria de OliveiraBARCELLOS,Aline Serrado de PinhoBOTTINO,Marco AntonioSOUZA,Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção eMELO,Renata Marques deeng2018-10-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100284Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-10-22T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
title Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
spellingShingle Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
DAL PIVA,Amanda Maria de Oliveira
Recycling
Ceramics
Stress, Mechanical
Hardness
title_short Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
title_full Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
title_fullStr Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
title_full_unstemmed Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
title_sort Can heat-pressed feldspathic ceramic be submitted to multiple heat-pressing?
author DAL PIVA,Amanda Maria de Oliveira
author_facet DAL PIVA,Amanda Maria de Oliveira
BARCELLOS,Aline Serrado de Pinho
BOTTINO,Marco Antonio
SOUZA,Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e
MELO,Renata Marques de
author_role author
author2 BARCELLOS,Aline Serrado de Pinho
BOTTINO,Marco Antonio
SOUZA,Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e
MELO,Renata Marques de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv DAL PIVA,Amanda Maria de Oliveira
BARCELLOS,Aline Serrado de Pinho
BOTTINO,Marco Antonio
SOUZA,Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e
MELO,Renata Marques de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Recycling
Ceramics
Stress, Mechanical
Hardness
topic Recycling
Ceramics
Stress, Mechanical
Hardness
description Abstract The aim of this study was to determine if multiple processing (heat-pressing) of a dental ceramic influences flexural strength, hardness, and microstructure. Ninety bar-shaped specimens (15 mm × 4 mm × 2 mm) of a pressed ceramic (Vita PM9) were fabricated and randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 15) according to the factors “number of pressings” (C1, C2, and C3, fired 1, 2, and 3 times, respectively) and “mechanical cycling” (M). Half of the specimens were mechanically cycled (106 cycles, 45 N, 3.4 Hz, in water) and all specimens were tested for 3-point bending (0.5 mm/min, load 1000 kgf) and Vickers hardness (19.6 N for 20 s). X-ray diffraction was used to characterize the phases and scanning electron microscopy to characterize the microstructure. The flexural strength data was statistically analyzed with Weibull analysis, ANOVA, and Tukey test. Hardness data was evaluated by 2-way ANOVA and Fisher test. All tests were performed with a significance level of 0.05. Two-way ANOVA revealed that neither “number of pressings” (p=0.085) or “mechanical cycling” (0.055) significantly affected flexural strength. But Weibull analysis showed significant difference for Weibull moduli and characteristic strength between groups. For hardness, a statistical difference was seen for the interaction “Number of pressings * Mechanical cycling”, (p = 0.016). Hardness decreased in the following order: C1 (775±17.2), CM3 (751±101), CM2 (735±45), C3 (701±82), CM1 (671±82), and C2 (663±92). Fewer defects were observed with an increased number of firings. Therefore, the possibility of recycling PM9 ceramic does not interfere in the evaluated mechanical properties and improves microstructure.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100284
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100284
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0106
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318326124380160