Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA,Carolina Lopes da
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: SCHERER,Maitê Munhoz, MENDES,Laura Teixeira, CASAGRANDE,Luciano, LEITUNE,Vicente Castelo Branco, LENZI,Tathiane Larissa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100233
Resumo: Abstract This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of a silane-containing universal adhesive used with or without a silane agent on the repair bond strength between aged and new composites. Forty nanohybrid composite resin blocks were stored in distilled water for 14 d and thermo-cycled. Sandpaper ground, etched, and rinsed speciments were randomly assigned into four experimental groups: silane + two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system, two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system, silane + silane-containing universal adhesive system, and silane-containing universal adhesive system. Blocks were repaired using the same composite. After 24 h of water storage, the blocks were sectioned and bonded sticks were submitted to microtensile testing. Ten unaged, non-repaired composite blocks were used as a reference group to evaluate the cohesive strength of the composite. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used to analyze average µTBS. One-way ANOVA and Dunnet post-hoc tests were used to compare the cohesive strength values and bond strength obtained in the repaired groups (α = 0.05). The µTBS values were higher for the silane-containing universal adhesive compared to the two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (p = 0.002). Silane application improved the repair bond strength (p = 0.03). The repair bond strength ranged from 39.3 to 65.8% of the cohesive strength of the reference group. Using universal silane-containing adhesive improved the repair bond strength of composite resin compared to two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. However, it still required prior application of a silane agent for best direct composite resin repair outcomes.
id SBPQO-1_926adf0df75c9cd0d512080831b2eae9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100233
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?Tensile StrengthDental Restoration RepairDental Restoration, PermanentAbstract This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of a silane-containing universal adhesive used with or without a silane agent on the repair bond strength between aged and new composites. Forty nanohybrid composite resin blocks were stored in distilled water for 14 d and thermo-cycled. Sandpaper ground, etched, and rinsed speciments were randomly assigned into four experimental groups: silane + two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system, two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system, silane + silane-containing universal adhesive system, and silane-containing universal adhesive system. Blocks were repaired using the same composite. After 24 h of water storage, the blocks were sectioned and bonded sticks were submitted to microtensile testing. Ten unaged, non-repaired composite blocks were used as a reference group to evaluate the cohesive strength of the composite. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used to analyze average µTBS. One-way ANOVA and Dunnet post-hoc tests were used to compare the cohesive strength values and bond strength obtained in the repaired groups (α = 0.05). The µTBS values were higher for the silane-containing universal adhesive compared to the two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (p = 0.002). Silane application improved the repair bond strength (p = 0.03). The repair bond strength ranged from 39.3 to 65.8% of the cohesive strength of the reference group. Using universal silane-containing adhesive improved the repair bond strength of composite resin compared to two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. However, it still required prior application of a silane agent for best direct composite resin repair outcomes.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100233Brazilian Oral Research v.34 2020reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0045info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSILVA,Carolina Lopes daSCHERER,Maitê MunhozMENDES,Laura TeixeiraCASAGRANDE,LucianoLEITUNE,Vicente Castelo BrancoLENZI,Tathiane Larissaeng2020-04-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100233Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2020-04-30T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
title Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
spellingShingle Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
SILVA,Carolina Lopes da
Tensile Strength
Dental Restoration Repair
Dental Restoration, Permanent
title_short Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
title_full Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
title_fullStr Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
title_full_unstemmed Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
title_sort Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?
author SILVA,Carolina Lopes da
author_facet SILVA,Carolina Lopes da
SCHERER,Maitê Munhoz
MENDES,Laura Teixeira
CASAGRANDE,Luciano
LEITUNE,Vicente Castelo Branco
LENZI,Tathiane Larissa
author_role author
author2 SCHERER,Maitê Munhoz
MENDES,Laura Teixeira
CASAGRANDE,Luciano
LEITUNE,Vicente Castelo Branco
LENZI,Tathiane Larissa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA,Carolina Lopes da
SCHERER,Maitê Munhoz
MENDES,Laura Teixeira
CASAGRANDE,Luciano
LEITUNE,Vicente Castelo Branco
LENZI,Tathiane Larissa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tensile Strength
Dental Restoration Repair
Dental Restoration, Permanent
topic Tensile Strength
Dental Restoration Repair
Dental Restoration, Permanent
description Abstract This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of a silane-containing universal adhesive used with or without a silane agent on the repair bond strength between aged and new composites. Forty nanohybrid composite resin blocks were stored in distilled water for 14 d and thermo-cycled. Sandpaper ground, etched, and rinsed speciments were randomly assigned into four experimental groups: silane + two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system, two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system, silane + silane-containing universal adhesive system, and silane-containing universal adhesive system. Blocks were repaired using the same composite. After 24 h of water storage, the blocks were sectioned and bonded sticks were submitted to microtensile testing. Ten unaged, non-repaired composite blocks were used as a reference group to evaluate the cohesive strength of the composite. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used to analyze average µTBS. One-way ANOVA and Dunnet post-hoc tests were used to compare the cohesive strength values and bond strength obtained in the repaired groups (α = 0.05). The µTBS values were higher for the silane-containing universal adhesive compared to the two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (p = 0.002). Silane application improved the repair bond strength (p = 0.03). The repair bond strength ranged from 39.3 to 65.8% of the cohesive strength of the reference group. Using universal silane-containing adhesive improved the repair bond strength of composite resin compared to two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. However, it still required prior application of a silane agent for best direct composite resin repair outcomes.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100233
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0045
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.34 2020
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318327067049984