Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132014000300250 |
Resumo: | Objective: To determine the reliability of a rapid hematology stain for the cytological analysis of induced sputum samples. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study comparing the standard technique (May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain) with a rapid hematology stain (Diff-Quik). Of the 50 subjects included in the study, 21 had asthma, 19 had COPD, and 10 were healthy (controls). From the induced sputum samples collected, we prepared four slides: two were stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa, and two were stained with Diff-Quik. The slides were read independently by two trained researchers blinded to the identification of the slides. The reliability for cell counting using the two techniques was evaluated by determining the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Agreement in the identification of neutrophilic and eosinophilic sputum between the observers and between the stains was evaluated with kappa statistics. Results: In our comparison of the two staining techniques, the ICCs indicated almost perfect interobserver agreement for neutrophil, eosinophil, and macrophage counts (ICC: 0.98-1.00), as well as substantial agreement for lymphocyte counts (ICC: 0.76-0.83). Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect for neutrophil, eosinophil, and macrophage counts (ICC: 0.96-0.99), whereas it was moderate to substantial for lymphocyte counts (ICC = 0.65 and 0.75 for the two observers, respectively). Interobserver agreement for the identification of eosinophilic and neutrophilic sputum using the two techniques ranged from substantial to almost perfect (kappa range: 0.91-1.00). Conclusions: The use of Diff-Quik can be considered a reliable alternative for the processing of sputum samples. |
id |
SBPT-1_29b6134f95c3c8866334ff2836de376c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-37132014000300250 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPT-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytologySputumSputumAzure stains Objective: To determine the reliability of a rapid hematology stain for the cytological analysis of induced sputum samples. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study comparing the standard technique (May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain) with a rapid hematology stain (Diff-Quik). Of the 50 subjects included in the study, 21 had asthma, 19 had COPD, and 10 were healthy (controls). From the induced sputum samples collected, we prepared four slides: two were stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa, and two were stained with Diff-Quik. The slides were read independently by two trained researchers blinded to the identification of the slides. The reliability for cell counting using the two techniques was evaluated by determining the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Agreement in the identification of neutrophilic and eosinophilic sputum between the observers and between the stains was evaluated with kappa statistics. Results: In our comparison of the two staining techniques, the ICCs indicated almost perfect interobserver agreement for neutrophil, eosinophil, and macrophage counts (ICC: 0.98-1.00), as well as substantial agreement for lymphocyte counts (ICC: 0.76-0.83). Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect for neutrophil, eosinophil, and macrophage counts (ICC: 0.96-0.99), whereas it was moderate to substantial for lymphocyte counts (ICC = 0.65 and 0.75 for the two observers, respectively). Interobserver agreement for the identification of eosinophilic and neutrophilic sputum using the two techniques ranged from substantial to almost perfect (kappa range: 0.91-1.00). Conclusions: The use of Diff-Quik can be considered a reliable alternative for the processing of sputum samples. Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132014000300250Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.40 n.3 2014reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.1590/S1806-37132014000300008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves,JéssicaPizzichini,EmilioPizzichini,Marcia Margaret MenezesSteidle,Leila John MarquesRocha,Cristiane CinaraFerreira,Samira CardosoZimmermann,Célia Tâniaeng2014-07-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132014000300250Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2014-07-10T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
title |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
spellingShingle |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology Gonçalves,Jéssica Sputum Sputum Azure stains |
title_short |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
title_full |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
title_fullStr |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
title_sort |
Reliability of a rapid hematology stain for sputum cytology |
author |
Gonçalves,Jéssica |
author_facet |
Gonçalves,Jéssica Pizzichini,Emilio Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes Steidle,Leila John Marques Rocha,Cristiane Cinara Ferreira,Samira Cardoso Zimmermann,Célia Tânia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pizzichini,Emilio Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes Steidle,Leila John Marques Rocha,Cristiane Cinara Ferreira,Samira Cardoso Zimmermann,Célia Tânia |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves,Jéssica Pizzichini,Emilio Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes Steidle,Leila John Marques Rocha,Cristiane Cinara Ferreira,Samira Cardoso Zimmermann,Célia Tânia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sputum Sputum Azure stains |
topic |
Sputum Sputum Azure stains |
description |
Objective: To determine the reliability of a rapid hematology stain for the cytological analysis of induced sputum samples. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study comparing the standard technique (May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain) with a rapid hematology stain (Diff-Quik). Of the 50 subjects included in the study, 21 had asthma, 19 had COPD, and 10 were healthy (controls). From the induced sputum samples collected, we prepared four slides: two were stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa, and two were stained with Diff-Quik. The slides were read independently by two trained researchers blinded to the identification of the slides. The reliability for cell counting using the two techniques was evaluated by determining the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Agreement in the identification of neutrophilic and eosinophilic sputum between the observers and between the stains was evaluated with kappa statistics. Results: In our comparison of the two staining techniques, the ICCs indicated almost perfect interobserver agreement for neutrophil, eosinophil, and macrophage counts (ICC: 0.98-1.00), as well as substantial agreement for lymphocyte counts (ICC: 0.76-0.83). Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect for neutrophil, eosinophil, and macrophage counts (ICC: 0.96-0.99), whereas it was moderate to substantial for lymphocyte counts (ICC = 0.65 and 0.75 for the two observers, respectively). Interobserver agreement for the identification of eosinophilic and neutrophilic sputum using the two techniques ranged from substantial to almost perfect (kappa range: 0.91-1.00). Conclusions: The use of Diff-Quik can be considered a reliable alternative for the processing of sputum samples. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132014000300250 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132014000300250 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-37132014000300008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.40 n.3 2014 reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) instacron:SBPT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) |
instacron_str |
SBPT |
institution |
SBPT |
reponame_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
collection |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318345918349312 |