Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coertjens,Patrícia Chaves
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Knorst,Marli Maria, Dumke,Anelise, Pasqualoto,Adriane Schmidt, Riboldi,João, Barreto,Sérgio Saldanha Menna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132013000600675
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To compare TLC and RV values obtained by the single-breath helium dilution (SBHD) method with those obtained by whole-body plethysmography (WBP) in patients with normal lung function, patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD), and patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD), varying in severity, and to devise equations to estimate the SBHD results.METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 169 individuals, of whom 93 and 49 presented with OLD and RLD, respectively, the remaining 27 having normal lung function. All patients underwent spirometry and lung volume measurement by both methods.RESULTS: TLC and RV were higher by WBP than by SBHD. The discrepancy between the methods was more pronounced in the OLD group, correlating with the severity of airflow obstruction. In the OLD group, the correlation coefficient of the comparison between the two methods was 0.57 and 0.56 for TLC and RV, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). We used regression equations, adjusted for the groups studied, in order to predict the WBP values of TLC and RV, using the corresponding SBHD values. It was possible to create regression equations to predict differences in TLC and RV between the two methods only for the OLD group. The TLC and RV equations were, respectively, ∆TLCWBP-SBHD in L = 5.264 − 0.060 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.33; adjusted r2 = 0.32) and ∆RVWBP-SBHD in L = 4.862 − 0.055 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.31; adjusted r2 = 0.30).CONCLUSIONS: The correction of TLC and RV results obtained by SBHD can improve the accuracy of this method for assessing lung volumes in patients with OLD. However, additional studies are needed in order to validate these equations.
id SBPT-1_51135d1f96fd53b2ed45db64a676fbd2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-37132013000600675
network_acronym_str SBPT-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?Plethysmography, whole bodyTotal lung capacityResidual volumeOBJECTIVE: To compare TLC and RV values obtained by the single-breath helium dilution (SBHD) method with those obtained by whole-body plethysmography (WBP) in patients with normal lung function, patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD), and patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD), varying in severity, and to devise equations to estimate the SBHD results.METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 169 individuals, of whom 93 and 49 presented with OLD and RLD, respectively, the remaining 27 having normal lung function. All patients underwent spirometry and lung volume measurement by both methods.RESULTS: TLC and RV were higher by WBP than by SBHD. The discrepancy between the methods was more pronounced in the OLD group, correlating with the severity of airflow obstruction. In the OLD group, the correlation coefficient of the comparison between the two methods was 0.57 and 0.56 for TLC and RV, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). We used regression equations, adjusted for the groups studied, in order to predict the WBP values of TLC and RV, using the corresponding SBHD values. It was possible to create regression equations to predict differences in TLC and RV between the two methods only for the OLD group. The TLC and RV equations were, respectively, ∆TLCWBP-SBHD in L = 5.264 − 0.060 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.33; adjusted r2 = 0.32) and ∆RVWBP-SBHD in L = 4.862 − 0.055 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.31; adjusted r2 = 0.30).CONCLUSIONS: The correction of TLC and RV results obtained by SBHD can improve the accuracy of this method for assessing lung volumes in patients with OLD. However, additional studies are needed in order to validate these equations.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132013000600675Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.39 n.6 2013reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.1590/S1806-37132013000600006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoertjens,Patrícia ChavesKnorst,Marli MariaDumke,AnelisePasqualoto,Adriane SchmidtRiboldi,JoãoBarreto,Sérgio Saldanha Mennaeng2015-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132013000600675Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2015-10-27T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
title Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
spellingShingle Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
Coertjens,Patrícia Chaves
Plethysmography, whole body
Total lung capacity
Residual volume
title_short Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
title_full Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
title_fullStr Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
title_full_unstemmed Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
title_sort Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
author Coertjens,Patrícia Chaves
author_facet Coertjens,Patrícia Chaves
Knorst,Marli Maria
Dumke,Anelise
Pasqualoto,Adriane Schmidt
Riboldi,João
Barreto,Sérgio Saldanha Menna
author_role author
author2 Knorst,Marli Maria
Dumke,Anelise
Pasqualoto,Adriane Schmidt
Riboldi,João
Barreto,Sérgio Saldanha Menna
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coertjens,Patrícia Chaves
Knorst,Marli Maria
Dumke,Anelise
Pasqualoto,Adriane Schmidt
Riboldi,João
Barreto,Sérgio Saldanha Menna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plethysmography, whole body
Total lung capacity
Residual volume
topic Plethysmography, whole body
Total lung capacity
Residual volume
description OBJECTIVE: To compare TLC and RV values obtained by the single-breath helium dilution (SBHD) method with those obtained by whole-body plethysmography (WBP) in patients with normal lung function, patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD), and patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD), varying in severity, and to devise equations to estimate the SBHD results.METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 169 individuals, of whom 93 and 49 presented with OLD and RLD, respectively, the remaining 27 having normal lung function. All patients underwent spirometry and lung volume measurement by both methods.RESULTS: TLC and RV were higher by WBP than by SBHD. The discrepancy between the methods was more pronounced in the OLD group, correlating with the severity of airflow obstruction. In the OLD group, the correlation coefficient of the comparison between the two methods was 0.57 and 0.56 for TLC and RV, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). We used regression equations, adjusted for the groups studied, in order to predict the WBP values of TLC and RV, using the corresponding SBHD values. It was possible to create regression equations to predict differences in TLC and RV between the two methods only for the OLD group. The TLC and RV equations were, respectively, ∆TLCWBP-SBHD in L = 5.264 − 0.060 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.33; adjusted r2 = 0.32) and ∆RVWBP-SBHD in L = 4.862 − 0.055 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.31; adjusted r2 = 0.30).CONCLUSIONS: The correction of TLC and RV results obtained by SBHD can improve the accuracy of this method for assessing lung volumes in patients with OLD. However, additional studies are needed in order to validate these equations.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132013000600675
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132013000600675
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-37132013000600006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.39 n.6 2013
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron:SBPT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron_str SBPT
institution SBPT
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br
_version_ 1750318345854386176