Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo,Éder Batalha
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Costa,Eduardo Paulino da, Costa,Aurea Helena Assis da, Lopes,Flávio Guiselli, Macedo,Gustavo Guerino, Paula,Tarcízio Antônio Rêgo de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982009000800009
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of sows artificially inseminated by the intrauterine (IAIU) technique. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design, with 300 sows being distributed in five insemination techniques: control, intra-cervical (IAIC) with 3x10(9) spermatozoa/100 mL; intrauterine (IAIU) with 1x10(9) spermatozoa/100 mL; intrauterine with com 1x10(9) spermatozoa/50 mL; intrauterine with 5x10(8) spermatozoa/100 mL; and intrauterine com 5x10(8) spermatozoa/50 mL. The sows submitted to intrauterine insemination presented a farrowing rate of 90.8% and return to estrus rate of 9.2%, which did not differ from the rates obtained by the intra-cervical technique (90.0% and 10.0%, respectively). Total litter size did not differ between the techniques, with the means being from 11.4 to 11.9 piglets at farrowing. Although 4.6% of the sows submitted to intrauterine artificial insemination had difficulty with pipette insertion into the cervix, 100% of them were inseminated. When evaluating semen backflow, no difference was found between the intra-cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques. However, total semen backflow was higher in sows submitted to inter-cervical insemination. No difference was found in the presence of blood between the two methods evaluated. Hence, any of the intrauterine insemination techniques can substitute inter-cervical artificial insemination without damaging the reproductive performance of the animals.
id SBZ-1_95206934719a111389b4dde26d2e64d2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982009000800009
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine inseminationintra-cervical inseminationintrauterine inseminationsemen backflowswineThe objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of sows artificially inseminated by the intrauterine (IAIU) technique. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design, with 300 sows being distributed in five insemination techniques: control, intra-cervical (IAIC) with 3x10(9) spermatozoa/100 mL; intrauterine (IAIU) with 1x10(9) spermatozoa/100 mL; intrauterine with com 1x10(9) spermatozoa/50 mL; intrauterine with 5x10(8) spermatozoa/100 mL; and intrauterine com 5x10(8) spermatozoa/50 mL. The sows submitted to intrauterine insemination presented a farrowing rate of 90.8% and return to estrus rate of 9.2%, which did not differ from the rates obtained by the intra-cervical technique (90.0% and 10.0%, respectively). Total litter size did not differ between the techniques, with the means being from 11.4 to 11.9 piglets at farrowing. Although 4.6% of the sows submitted to intrauterine artificial insemination had difficulty with pipette insertion into the cervix, 100% of them were inseminated. When evaluating semen backflow, no difference was found between the intra-cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques. However, total semen backflow was higher in sows submitted to inter-cervical insemination. No difference was found in the presence of blood between the two methods evaluated. Hence, any of the intrauterine insemination techniques can substitute inter-cervical artificial insemination without damaging the reproductive performance of the animals.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982009000800009Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.38 n.8 2009reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982009000800009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo,Éder BatalhaCosta,Eduardo Paulino daCosta,Aurea Helena Assis daLopes,Flávio GuiselliMacedo,Gustavo GuerinoPaula,Tarcízio Antônio Rêgo deeng2009-09-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982009000800009Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2009-09-18T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
title Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
spellingShingle Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
Araújo,Éder Batalha
intra-cervical insemination
intrauterine insemination
semen backflow
swine
title_short Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
title_full Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
title_fullStr Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
title_sort Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination
author Araújo,Éder Batalha
author_facet Araújo,Éder Batalha
Costa,Eduardo Paulino da
Costa,Aurea Helena Assis da
Lopes,Flávio Guiselli
Macedo,Gustavo Guerino
Paula,Tarcízio Antônio Rêgo de
author_role author
author2 Costa,Eduardo Paulino da
Costa,Aurea Helena Assis da
Lopes,Flávio Guiselli
Macedo,Gustavo Guerino
Paula,Tarcízio Antônio Rêgo de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo,Éder Batalha
Costa,Eduardo Paulino da
Costa,Aurea Helena Assis da
Lopes,Flávio Guiselli
Macedo,Gustavo Guerino
Paula,Tarcízio Antônio Rêgo de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv intra-cervical insemination
intrauterine insemination
semen backflow
swine
topic intra-cervical insemination
intrauterine insemination
semen backflow
swine
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of sows artificially inseminated by the intrauterine (IAIU) technique. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design, with 300 sows being distributed in five insemination techniques: control, intra-cervical (IAIC) with 3x10(9) spermatozoa/100 mL; intrauterine (IAIU) with 1x10(9) spermatozoa/100 mL; intrauterine with com 1x10(9) spermatozoa/50 mL; intrauterine with 5x10(8) spermatozoa/100 mL; and intrauterine com 5x10(8) spermatozoa/50 mL. The sows submitted to intrauterine insemination presented a farrowing rate of 90.8% and return to estrus rate of 9.2%, which did not differ from the rates obtained by the intra-cervical technique (90.0% and 10.0%, respectively). Total litter size did not differ between the techniques, with the means being from 11.4 to 11.9 piglets at farrowing. Although 4.6% of the sows submitted to intrauterine artificial insemination had difficulty with pipette insertion into the cervix, 100% of them were inseminated. When evaluating semen backflow, no difference was found between the intra-cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques. However, total semen backflow was higher in sows submitted to inter-cervical insemination. No difference was found in the presence of blood between the two methods evaluated. Hence, any of the intrauterine insemination techniques can substitute inter-cervical artificial insemination without damaging the reproductive performance of the animals.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982009000800009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982009000800009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982009000800009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.38 n.8 2009
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318144659914752