A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vicari, Isabella
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404
Resumo: This work aims to analyze the debate on the security of the Brazilian Electronic voting machine since the implementation of computerized voting in the country by the Superior Electoral Court, in the early 2000s, until the election year of 2022. We seek to identify different contexts, rhetorical strategies and inflection points. In this sense, we comparatively structured this debate in three distinct moments: during the attempts to implement the printed voting receipt, in 2009 and 2015, and during the 2022 presidential election. To achieve the purpose, integrated Content Analysis is mobilized with the aim of identifying actors, arguments and justifications that permeated the discussion in different spaces and moments. Initially, in 2009, the unit of analysis consisted of statements from a Public Hearing, investigated from the perspectives of the field of studies in Science, Technology and Society (CTS) to map the techno-scientific controversy. Secondly, we started from 2015 to analyze statements made in the 28th Ordinary Joint Legislative Session and examine the political controversy existing in the Brazilian parliament. Finally, we used as a unit of analysis 853 unique pieces of misinformation, collected through checks carried out by nine different fact-checking websites between August 1, 2022 and December 1, 2022, to ascertain whether disinformation about electronic voting machines, predominant in 2022, represents a different phenomenon from that which characterizes controversies. The central hypothesis of the work deduces that, in the current scenario characterized by the decentralization of the production of political information, disinformation about the Electronic voting machine was the result of an agenda carried out by a certain political group with political-electoral interests, not having entered the public's agendas and the media's agendas spontaneously. The results of the study indicated that the campaign of Jair Bolsonaro, a candidate for re-election affiliated with the Liberal Party (PL), used, in the majority, content intended to attack the Brazilian electoral system based on accusations of electoral fraud and the fragility of Electronic voting machines. Therefore, the fraudulent election's rhetoric did not enter the political agenda of right-wing groups and parties in 2022, but was a strategy nurtured in the face of consecutive defeats by the disadvantaged side in Brazilian presidential disputes.
id SCAR_c72d579a9829085f34ee58c16f6994df
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/19404
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Vicari, IsabellaIasulaitis, Sylviahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4226275371443693http://lattes.cnpq.br/1941110653491980https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-7346https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-10032024-02-19T18:19:39Z2024-02-19T18:19:39Z2024-02-09VICARI, Isabella. A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação. 2024. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2024. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404This work aims to analyze the debate on the security of the Brazilian Electronic voting machine since the implementation of computerized voting in the country by the Superior Electoral Court, in the early 2000s, until the election year of 2022. We seek to identify different contexts, rhetorical strategies and inflection points. In this sense, we comparatively structured this debate in three distinct moments: during the attempts to implement the printed voting receipt, in 2009 and 2015, and during the 2022 presidential election. To achieve the purpose, integrated Content Analysis is mobilized with the aim of identifying actors, arguments and justifications that permeated the discussion in different spaces and moments. Initially, in 2009, the unit of analysis consisted of statements from a Public Hearing, investigated from the perspectives of the field of studies in Science, Technology and Society (CTS) to map the techno-scientific controversy. Secondly, we started from 2015 to analyze statements made in the 28th Ordinary Joint Legislative Session and examine the political controversy existing in the Brazilian parliament. Finally, we used as a unit of analysis 853 unique pieces of misinformation, collected through checks carried out by nine different fact-checking websites between August 1, 2022 and December 1, 2022, to ascertain whether disinformation about electronic voting machines, predominant in 2022, represents a different phenomenon from that which characterizes controversies. The central hypothesis of the work deduces that, in the current scenario characterized by the decentralization of the production of political information, disinformation about the Electronic voting machine was the result of an agenda carried out by a certain political group with political-electoral interests, not having entered the public's agendas and the media's agendas spontaneously. The results of the study indicated that the campaign of Jair Bolsonaro, a candidate for re-election affiliated with the Liberal Party (PL), used, in the majority, content intended to attack the Brazilian electoral system based on accusations of electoral fraud and the fragility of Electronic voting machines. Therefore, the fraudulent election's rhetoric did not enter the political agenda of right-wing groups and parties in 2022, but was a strategy nurtured in the face of consecutive defeats by the disadvantaged side in Brazilian presidential disputes.Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar de que maneira deflagrou-se o debate sobre a segurança da urna eletrônica brasileira desde a implementação do voto informatizado no país pelo Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, no início dos anos 2000, até o ano eleitoral de 2022, buscando identificar diferenças contextuais, estratégias retóricas e pontos de inflexão. Nesse sentido, estruturamos comparativamente este debate em três momentos distintos: durante as tentativas de implementação do comprovante impresso de votação, em 2009 e 2015, e durante o pleito eleitoral de 2022. Para atingir o objetivo proposto, mobiliza-se a Análise de Conteúdo integrada com o intuito de identificar atores, argumentos e justificações que permearam a discussão em espaços e momentos distintos. Inicialmente, em 2009, a unidade de análise consistiu em proferimentos de uma Audiência Pública, investigados a partir das perspectivas do campo de estudos em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS) para mapear a controvérsia tecnocientífica. Em segundo lugar, partimos do ano de 2015 para analisar proferimentos realizados na 28ª Sessão Legislativa Ordinária Conjunta e examinar a controvérsia política existente no legislativo brasileiro. Por fim, utilizamos como unidade de análise 853 peças de desinformação únicas, coletadas por meio de verificações feitas por nove sites de checagem de fatos diferentes entre 1º de agosto de 2022 e 1º de dezembro de 2022, para averiguar se a desinformação sobre as urnas eletrônicas, predominante em 2022, configura um fenômeno distinto daquele que caracteriza as controvérsias. A hipótese central do trabalho depreende que, no atual cenário caracterizado pela descentralização da produção de informação política, a desinformação sobre a urna eletrônica foi fruto de um agendamento realizado por um determinado grupo político com interesses político-eleitorais, não tendo adentrado nas agendas do público e da mídia de maneira espontânea. Os resultados do estudo indicaram que a campanha de Jair Bolsonaro, candidato à reeleição filiado ao Partido Liberal (PL), usufruiu, de forma majoritária, de conteúdos destinados a atacar o sistema eleitoral brasileiro a partir de acusações de fraude eleitoral e fragilidade das urnas eletrônicas, e que a retórica da fraude nas urnas não entrou na agenda política dos grupos e partidos de direita apenas em 2022, mas foi uma estratégia alimentada frente às consecutivas derrotas do lado em desvantagem nas disputas presidenciais brasileiras.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)CAPES: Código de financiamento 001porUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade - PPGCTSUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUrna eletrônicaControvérsia tecnocientíficaDesinformaçãoEleições brasileiras de 2022Eletronic voting machineTechnoscientific controversyDisinformation2022 brazilian electionsCIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICACIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAOA urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformaçãoBrazilian electronic voting machine: controversies and disinformationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALA urna eletrônica brasileira Dissertação Mestrado.pdfA urna eletrônica brasileira Dissertação Mestrado.pdfArtigo principalapplication/pdf5358249https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/19404/1/A%20urna%20eletr%c3%b4nica%20brasileira%20Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20Mestrado.pdf89977d6a715426f516712288be2d3955MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8810https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/19404/2/license_rdff337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aecMD52TEXTA urna eletrônica brasileira Dissertação Mestrado.pdf.txtA urna eletrônica brasileira Dissertação Mestrado.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain356989https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/19404/3/A%20urna%20eletr%c3%b4nica%20brasileira%20Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20Mestrado.pdf.txtd8ff7bce7e830325a7d1fd3862ac050fMD53ufscar/194042024-05-14 17:34:45.355oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/19404Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222024-05-14T17:34:45Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Brazilian electronic voting machine: controversies and disinformation
title A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
spellingShingle A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
Vicari, Isabella
Urna eletrônica
Controvérsia tecnocientífica
Desinformação
Eleições brasileiras de 2022
Eletronic voting machine
Technoscientific controversy
Disinformation
2022 brazilian elections
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICA
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
title_short A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
title_full A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
title_fullStr A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
title_full_unstemmed A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
title_sort A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação
author Vicari, Isabella
author_facet Vicari, Isabella
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1941110653491980
dc.contributor.authororcid.por.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-7346
dc.contributor.advisor1orcid.por.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-1003
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vicari, Isabella
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Iasulaitis, Sylvia
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4226275371443693
contributor_str_mv Iasulaitis, Sylvia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Urna eletrônica
Controvérsia tecnocientífica
Desinformação
Eleições brasileiras de 2022
topic Urna eletrônica
Controvérsia tecnocientífica
Desinformação
Eleições brasileiras de 2022
Eletronic voting machine
Technoscientific controversy
Disinformation
2022 brazilian elections
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICA
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Eletronic voting machine
Technoscientific controversy
Disinformation
2022 brazilian elections
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICA
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
description This work aims to analyze the debate on the security of the Brazilian Electronic voting machine since the implementation of computerized voting in the country by the Superior Electoral Court, in the early 2000s, until the election year of 2022. We seek to identify different contexts, rhetorical strategies and inflection points. In this sense, we comparatively structured this debate in three distinct moments: during the attempts to implement the printed voting receipt, in 2009 and 2015, and during the 2022 presidential election. To achieve the purpose, integrated Content Analysis is mobilized with the aim of identifying actors, arguments and justifications that permeated the discussion in different spaces and moments. Initially, in 2009, the unit of analysis consisted of statements from a Public Hearing, investigated from the perspectives of the field of studies in Science, Technology and Society (CTS) to map the techno-scientific controversy. Secondly, we started from 2015 to analyze statements made in the 28th Ordinary Joint Legislative Session and examine the political controversy existing in the Brazilian parliament. Finally, we used as a unit of analysis 853 unique pieces of misinformation, collected through checks carried out by nine different fact-checking websites between August 1, 2022 and December 1, 2022, to ascertain whether disinformation about electronic voting machines, predominant in 2022, represents a different phenomenon from that which characterizes controversies. The central hypothesis of the work deduces that, in the current scenario characterized by the decentralization of the production of political information, disinformation about the Electronic voting machine was the result of an agenda carried out by a certain political group with political-electoral interests, not having entered the public's agendas and the media's agendas spontaneously. The results of the study indicated that the campaign of Jair Bolsonaro, a candidate for re-election affiliated with the Liberal Party (PL), used, in the majority, content intended to attack the Brazilian electoral system based on accusations of electoral fraud and the fragility of Electronic voting machines. Therefore, the fraudulent election's rhetoric did not enter the political agenda of right-wing groups and parties in 2022, but was a strategy nurtured in the face of consecutive defeats by the disadvantaged side in Brazilian presidential disputes.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-02-19T18:19:39Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2024-02-19T18:19:39Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2024-02-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv VICARI, Isabella. A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação. 2024. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2024. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404
identifier_str_mv VICARI, Isabella. A urna eletrônica brasileira: entre controvérsias e desinformação. 2024. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2024. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/19404
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade - PPGCTS
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/19404/1/A%20urna%20eletr%c3%b4nica%20brasileira%20Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20Mestrado.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/19404/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/19404/3/A%20urna%20eletr%c3%b4nica%20brasileira%20Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20Mestrado.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 89977d6a715426f516712288be2d3955
f337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aec
d8ff7bce7e830325a7d1fd3862ac050f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136433364828160