Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Longhini, Marcos Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/2176
Resumo: Contrary to what is known as process-product researches, in which teachers used to be seen as a mere technical performer, nowadays the teacher is the centerpiece in the educational process. In this new approach, the teacher is the core of the debates and professional practices, personal life and know-how of the professional practices are analysed. Lee Shulman is one of the researchers who tries to make a list of required knowledge for a teacher to carry out his/her job. This list is referred to as knowledge base of teaching by the author, which is formed, mainly, by content knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. As one of the sources to acquire such knowledge is the everyday practice, we have asked in which aspects and how a veteran teacher and a teacher-to-be, working together in their development process, and having a training teacher as mediator, can share the required knowledge in teaching. Two professionals graduated in Education and the researcher, in the role of mediator, took part in this study. One of the professionals, referred to as teacher-to-be, had no classroom practice; the other, referred to as veteran teacher, had an eighteen-year-long experience. Data was gathered from August through December 2003. The focal point was the elaboration, implementation and reflection about a series of five classes taught to early grades in Elementary School, the subject being air . The focus was the knowledge that is part of the knowledge base of teaching pointed out by Shulman. Results showed that the teacher-to-be faced the same difficulties and experienced similar tensions and anxiety as her veteran peer when at the beginning of her career. However, after years of practice, the veteran teacher seemed to have solid techniques or strategies on how to deal with students, differently from the teacher-to-be, who still tried to build them up by a process of trial and error. The greatest interaction between them was about the general pedagogical knowledge , when they talked about strategies to control students discipline, their characteristics and their behavior during classes. Both presented an important lack of content knowledge , which made it difficult for them to understand each other when that was the point. They had different motivation concerning the focus of analyses of the classes and about what they wanted to learn: the teacher-to-be focused on her own performance while the veteran teacher looked at the learning process by the students. Such fact might show that, instead of helping the development process, the longer the practice the more difficult for the peers to interact since the teachers interests could be different. Accepting an opinion or idea from a peer seems to be tied more to private characteristics of those involved. Contrary to what was expected, i.e., that the teacher-to-be could learn more about how to teach from the veteran teacher, there was learning by both professionals and an improvement in their knowledge base of teaching .
id SCAR_dccb752f3505b67b55c57817f59716f2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/2176
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Longhini, Marcos DanielHartwing, Dácio Rodneyhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=P15715753febea0-72b9-4f20-8fbc-8879dfe04e6b2016-06-02T19:35:28Z2007-08-202016-06-02T19:35:28Z2006-03-24LONGHINI, Marcos Daniel. Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.. 2006. 293 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2006.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/2176Contrary to what is known as process-product researches, in which teachers used to be seen as a mere technical performer, nowadays the teacher is the centerpiece in the educational process. In this new approach, the teacher is the core of the debates and professional practices, personal life and know-how of the professional practices are analysed. Lee Shulman is one of the researchers who tries to make a list of required knowledge for a teacher to carry out his/her job. This list is referred to as knowledge base of teaching by the author, which is formed, mainly, by content knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. As one of the sources to acquire such knowledge is the everyday practice, we have asked in which aspects and how a veteran teacher and a teacher-to-be, working together in their development process, and having a training teacher as mediator, can share the required knowledge in teaching. Two professionals graduated in Education and the researcher, in the role of mediator, took part in this study. One of the professionals, referred to as teacher-to-be, had no classroom practice; the other, referred to as veteran teacher, had an eighteen-year-long experience. Data was gathered from August through December 2003. The focal point was the elaboration, implementation and reflection about a series of five classes taught to early grades in Elementary School, the subject being air . The focus was the knowledge that is part of the knowledge base of teaching pointed out by Shulman. Results showed that the teacher-to-be faced the same difficulties and experienced similar tensions and anxiety as her veteran peer when at the beginning of her career. However, after years of practice, the veteran teacher seemed to have solid techniques or strategies on how to deal with students, differently from the teacher-to-be, who still tried to build them up by a process of trial and error. The greatest interaction between them was about the general pedagogical knowledge , when they talked about strategies to control students discipline, their characteristics and their behavior during classes. Both presented an important lack of content knowledge , which made it difficult for them to understand each other when that was the point. They had different motivation concerning the focus of analyses of the classes and about what they wanted to learn: the teacher-to-be focused on her own performance while the veteran teacher looked at the learning process by the students. Such fact might show that, instead of helping the development process, the longer the practice the more difficult for the peers to interact since the teachers interests could be different. Accepting an opinion or idea from a peer seems to be tied more to private characteristics of those involved. Contrary to what was expected, i.e., that the teacher-to-be could learn more about how to teach from the veteran teacher, there was learning by both professionals and an improvement in their knowledge base of teaching .Em contraposição às pesquisas em que o docente era visto como mero executor técnico, chamadas pesquisas processo-produto , atualmente ele é peça fundamental no processo educativo. Neste novo enfoque, o professor ocupa o centro dos debates, tendo como análise suas práticas profissionais, sua vida pessoal e os saberes de sua prática profissional. Lee Shulman é um dos pesquisadores que busca apontar um rol de conhecimentos necessários para que o professor exerça sua atividade. A este conjunto de conhecimentos, o autor designou base de conhecimento para o ensino , que se constitui principalmente, pelo conhecimento do conteúdo específico, conhecimentos pedagógico geral e conhecimento pedagógico do conteúdo. Como uma das fontes de aprendizagem de tais conhecimentos é a prática cotidiana, questionamos em que e de que forma, um professor atuante e um aspirante, trabalhando conjuntamente em seu processo de formação, contribuem entre si na construção de conhecimentos necessários para o ensino, tendo como mediador a participação de um professor formador? Participaram desta pesquisa duas licenciandas de um curso de Pedagogia e o pesquisador, assumindo o papel de mediador. Uma delas, denominada professora aspirante , não possuía nenhuma experiência docente; a outra, denominada professora atuante , atuava como docente há 18 anos. A coleta de dados ocorreu durante o 2o. semestre de 2003 e teve como eixo norteador a elaboração/implementação/reflexão sobre um conjunto de cinco aulas dedicadas às séries iniciais do Ensino Fundamental acerca do tema ar . Tomou-se como eixo central de análise os conhecimentos constituintes da base de conhecimentos para o ensino , apontada por Shulman. Resultados mostraram que a professora aspirante enfrentou as mesmas dificuldades e vivenciou semelhantes tensões e angústias que sua colega experiente, quando no início da carreira. Porém, a professora atuante, após anos de prática, parecia possuir esquemas ou estratégias consolidadas a respeito de como lidar com os alunos, diferentemente da professora aspirante, que ainda buscava construí-los num processo de tentativa e erro. A maior interação entre elas ocorreu acerca dos conhecimentos pedagógicos gerais, quando comentavam sobre estratégias de controle da indisciplina dos alunos, suas características e comportamentos durante as aulas. Ambas apresentaram uma significativa carência referente ao conhecimento do conteúdo específico, o que dificultou a interação entre elas quando se tratava deste aspecto. Possuíam motivações diferentes quanto ao foco de análise das aulas e acerca do que buscavam aprender: a aspirante focava em sua própria performance e a atuante, na aprendizagem de seus alunos. Tal dado pode ser indício de que níveis de experiência distintos podem dificultar o processo de interação entre os pares, ao invés de ser um aliado na formação, pois os interesses dos docentes podem ser diferentes. Acolher uma opinião ou idéia de um par parece estar mais atrelada a fatores intrínsecos de quem se propõe a realizá-la. Contrariamente ao esperado, ou seja, de que a professora aspirante pudesse aprender mais sobre como ensinar com seu par experiente, houve aprendizagem de ambas as partes e uma ampliação em suas bases de conhecimentos para o ensino .application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Educação - PPGEUFSCarBRProfessores - formaçãoProfessores iniciantesProfessores atuantesBase de conhecimentosKnowledge base of teachingVeteran teacherTeacher-to beCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOEnsinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-1-1796d8209-75fd-4955-98fc-a8627e497768info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALTeseMDL.pdfapplication/pdf1532558https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/2176/1/TeseMDL.pdfc14d186c53d86bd0224da3c79b36e14aMD51THUMBNAILTeseMDL.pdf.jpgTeseMDL.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6287https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/2176/2/TeseMDL.pdf.jpgfe436254296f050004f4316732ebb201MD52ufscar/21762023-09-18 18:31:39.613oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/2176Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:39Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
title Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
spellingShingle Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
Longhini, Marcos Daniel
Professores - formação
Professores iniciantes
Professores atuantes
Base de conhecimentos
Knowledge base of teaching
Veteran teacher
Teacher-to be
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
title_short Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
title_full Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
title_fullStr Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
title_full_unstemmed Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
title_sort Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.
author Longhini, Marcos Daniel
author_facet Longhini, Marcos Daniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=P157157
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Longhini, Marcos Daniel
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Hartwing, Dácio Rodney
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 53febea0-72b9-4f20-8fbc-8879dfe04e6b
contributor_str_mv Hartwing, Dácio Rodney
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Professores - formação
Professores iniciantes
Professores atuantes
Base de conhecimentos
topic Professores - formação
Professores iniciantes
Professores atuantes
Base de conhecimentos
Knowledge base of teaching
Veteran teacher
Teacher-to be
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Knowledge base of teaching
Veteran teacher
Teacher-to be
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
description Contrary to what is known as process-product researches, in which teachers used to be seen as a mere technical performer, nowadays the teacher is the centerpiece in the educational process. In this new approach, the teacher is the core of the debates and professional practices, personal life and know-how of the professional practices are analysed. Lee Shulman is one of the researchers who tries to make a list of required knowledge for a teacher to carry out his/her job. This list is referred to as knowledge base of teaching by the author, which is formed, mainly, by content knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. As one of the sources to acquire such knowledge is the everyday practice, we have asked in which aspects and how a veteran teacher and a teacher-to-be, working together in their development process, and having a training teacher as mediator, can share the required knowledge in teaching. Two professionals graduated in Education and the researcher, in the role of mediator, took part in this study. One of the professionals, referred to as teacher-to-be, had no classroom practice; the other, referred to as veteran teacher, had an eighteen-year-long experience. Data was gathered from August through December 2003. The focal point was the elaboration, implementation and reflection about a series of five classes taught to early grades in Elementary School, the subject being air . The focus was the knowledge that is part of the knowledge base of teaching pointed out by Shulman. Results showed that the teacher-to-be faced the same difficulties and experienced similar tensions and anxiety as her veteran peer when at the beginning of her career. However, after years of practice, the veteran teacher seemed to have solid techniques or strategies on how to deal with students, differently from the teacher-to-be, who still tried to build them up by a process of trial and error. The greatest interaction between them was about the general pedagogical knowledge , when they talked about strategies to control students discipline, their characteristics and their behavior during classes. Both presented an important lack of content knowledge , which made it difficult for them to understand each other when that was the point. They had different motivation concerning the focus of analyses of the classes and about what they wanted to learn: the teacher-to-be focused on her own performance while the veteran teacher looked at the learning process by the students. Such fact might show that, instead of helping the development process, the longer the practice the more difficult for the peers to interact since the teachers interests could be different. Accepting an opinion or idea from a peer seems to be tied more to private characteristics of those involved. Contrary to what was expected, i.e., that the teacher-to-be could learn more about how to teach from the veteran teacher, there was learning by both professionals and an improvement in their knowledge base of teaching .
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2006-03-24
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2007-08-20
2016-06-02T19:35:28Z
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T19:35:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LONGHINI, Marcos Daniel. Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.. 2006. 293 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2006.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/2176
identifier_str_mv LONGHINI, Marcos Daniel. Ensinando a ensinar ou vivendo para aprender? A interação entre os conhecimentos de um professor atuante e de um aspirante, como subsídio para aprendizagem da docência.. 2006. 293 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2006.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/2176
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv -1
-1
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 796d8209-75fd-4955-98fc-a8627e497768
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação - PPGE
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/2176/1/TeseMDL.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/2176/2/TeseMDL.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c14d186c53d86bd0224da3c79b36e14a
fe436254296f050004f4316732ebb201
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136257642364928