THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4148 |
Resumo: | This article is part of a broader study that analyzed the discourses of school inclusion in official documents and how they enact strategies of governmentality on the so-called normal subjects. Therefore, it was key to question the concept of normality. This text aims to present how the notion of normality was historically produced and, together with it, the practices of in/exclusion focusing on the subjects considered normal. We take as theoretical support the studies conducted by Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo, and Georges Canguilhem, who questioned the notions of abnormality and norm. As a result, we built three historical meanings to the notion of normality related to the knowledge produced throughout a certain period: the transcendental normality– in the Middle Ages established by religious and/or divine knowledge, connected to the subjects’ bodies and conducts; the scientific normality – founded by scientific knowledge, between the 16th and 18th centuries, which seems linked to the subjects’ behaviors and, by the end of the 18th century, also connected to their intimacy; and the differential normalities- associated to a science of State, to statistical knowledge, and a flexible norm, which operates in the security society. This notion is established through two contemporary movements related to the same phenomenon: the naturalization of differences. |
id |
SCI-1_08c5544cac269d25841e5e29e75ec966 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4148 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGSLA PRODUCCIÓN DE LA NOCIÓN DE NORMALIDAD Y SUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOSA PRODUÇÃO DA NOÇÃO DE NORMALIDADE E SEUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOSnormalidadenormainclusãonormalitynorminclusionnormalidadenormainclusiónThis article is part of a broader study that analyzed the discourses of school inclusion in official documents and how they enact strategies of governmentality on the so-called normal subjects. Therefore, it was key to question the concept of normality. This text aims to present how the notion of normality was historically produced and, together with it, the practices of in/exclusion focusing on the subjects considered normal. We take as theoretical support the studies conducted by Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo, and Georges Canguilhem, who questioned the notions of abnormality and norm. As a result, we built three historical meanings to the notion of normality related to the knowledge produced throughout a certain period: the transcendental normality– in the Middle Ages established by religious and/or divine knowledge, connected to the subjects’ bodies and conducts; the scientific normality – founded by scientific knowledge, between the 16th and 18th centuries, which seems linked to the subjects’ behaviors and, by the end of the 18th century, also connected to their intimacy; and the differential normalities- associated to a science of State, to statistical knowledge, and a flexible norm, which operates in the security society. This notion is established through two contemporary movements related to the same phenomenon: the naturalization of differences.Este artículo es el recorte de una investigación más amplia que analizó discursos sobre la inclusión escolar, en documentos oficiales, y el modo como operan estrategias de gobernanza sobre los sujetos llamados normales. Para ello, tensionar el concepto de normalidad fue fundamental para la investigación. El presente texto tiene como objetivo presentar cómo se ha ido produciendo históricamente la noción de normalidad y junto a ella prácticas de in/exclusión con énfasis en el sujeto llamado normal. Tomamos como soporte teórico los estudios realizados por Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo y Georges Canguilhem, autores que en sus investigaciones tensionaron las nociones de anormalidad y norma. Como resultados, construimos tres significados históricos para la noción de normalidad que se encuentran relacionados con los saberes producidos a lo largo de cada época: la normalidad trascendental -evidenciada en la Edad Media y constituida por saberes religiosos y/o divinos, estando vinculada al cuerpo y a la conducta de los sujetos; la normalidad científica – constituida por el conocimiento científico, entre los siglos XVI y XVIII, aparece vinculada al comportamiento de los sujetos y, a fines del siglo XVIII, también se muestra relacionada con su intimidad; y normalidades diferenciales – asociada a una ciencia del Estado, a los saberes estadísticos y a una norma flexible, que entra en operación en la sociedad de seguridad. Esta noción se constituye a partir de dos movimientos contemporáneos relacionados con un mismo fenómeno: la naturalización de las diferencias.Este artigo é recorte de uma pesquisa mais ampla que analisou discursos da inclusão escolar, em documentos oficiais, e o modo como operam estratégias de governamento sobre os sujeitos ditos normais. Para isso, tensionar o conceito de normalidade foi fundamental para a pesquisa. O presente texto tem assim por objetivo apresentar como a noção de normalidade foi sendo produzida historicamente e junto a ela práticas de in/exclusão com ênfase no sujeito dito normal. Tomamos como suporte teórico os estudos realizados por Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo e Georges Canguilhem, autores que em suas investigações tensionaram as noções de anormalidade e norma. Como resultados construímos três sentidos históricos para a noção de normalidade que se encontram relacionados com os saberes produzidos ao longo de cada época: a normalidade transcendental – evidenciada na Idade Média e constituída pelos saberes religiosos e/ou divinos, estando vinculada ao corpo e a conduta dos sujeitos; a normalidade científica – constituída pelos saberes científicos, entre os séculos XVI e XVIII, aparece vinculada ao comportamento dos sujeitos e no fim do século XVIII, também, se mostra relacionada a sua intimidade; e as normalidades diferenciais – associada a uma ciência de Estado, aos saberes estatísticos e a uma norma flexível, que entra em operação na sociedade de seguridade. Essa noção se constitui a partir de dois movimentos contemporâneos relacionados a um mesmo fenômeno: o da naturalização das diferenças.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-05-20info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/414810.1590/SciELOPreprints.4148porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4148/7855Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Bottero Corrêa, Kamila Lockmannhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrêa, Camila BotteroLockmann, Kamilareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-05-19T12:09:09Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4148Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-05-19T12:09:09SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS LA PRODUCCIÓN DE LA NOCIÓN DE NORMALIDAD Y SUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOS A PRODUÇÃO DA NOÇÃO DE NORMALIDADE E SEUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOS |
title |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS |
spellingShingle |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS Corrêa, Camila Bottero normalidade norma inclusão normality norm inclusion normalidade norma inclusión |
title_short |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS |
title_full |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS |
title_fullStr |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS |
title_sort |
THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS |
author |
Corrêa, Camila Bottero |
author_facet |
Corrêa, Camila Bottero Lockmann, Kamila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lockmann, Kamila |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corrêa, Camila Bottero Lockmann, Kamila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
normalidade norma inclusão normality norm inclusion normalidade norma inclusión |
topic |
normalidade norma inclusão normality norm inclusion normalidade norma inclusión |
description |
This article is part of a broader study that analyzed the discourses of school inclusion in official documents and how they enact strategies of governmentality on the so-called normal subjects. Therefore, it was key to question the concept of normality. This text aims to present how the notion of normality was historically produced and, together with it, the practices of in/exclusion focusing on the subjects considered normal. We take as theoretical support the studies conducted by Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo, and Georges Canguilhem, who questioned the notions of abnormality and norm. As a result, we built three historical meanings to the notion of normality related to the knowledge produced throughout a certain period: the transcendental normality– in the Middle Ages established by religious and/or divine knowledge, connected to the subjects’ bodies and conducts; the scientific normality – founded by scientific knowledge, between the 16th and 18th centuries, which seems linked to the subjects’ behaviors and, by the end of the 18th century, also connected to their intimacy; and the differential normalities- associated to a science of State, to statistical knowledge, and a flexible norm, which operates in the security society. This notion is established through two contemporary movements related to the same phenomenon: the naturalization of differences. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4148 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4148 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4148 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4148 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4148/7855 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Bottero Corrêa, Kamila Lockmann https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Bottero Corrêa, Kamila Lockmann https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047828536623104 |