“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6880 |
Resumo: | This paper addresses, based on elements of broader ethnographic research, the participation of the Ministério Público Federal - MPF (Public Ministry) in the judicial recognition of the Sacred Sanctuary of the Pajés, located in Brasília, as a traditionally occupied indigenous land. The recognition took place in a lawsuit proposed by the MPF/DF (Federal Public Ministry of the Federal District), which continues to follow the case. An analysis is proposed from the perspective of the anthropology of law, which allows for a deep theoretical approach to the theme of rights enforcement. The participation of the MPF is examined through the native category of "collective guardianship" (tutela coletiva) which designates the defense of collective rights, shedding light on the tutelary characteristic of this role of the MPF. The MPF acts supported not only by the idea of "hipossuficiência" (lack of power or vulnerability), which underpins the institutional function of the organization but also, paradoxically, by the discourse of respecting the viewpoint of those involved. However, this role is strained by the protagonism of the indigenous community in defending its interests. Consequently, there is a dissonance between the discourse and the institutional practice, with implications for the conflict management process. |
id |
SCI-1_40bb1cd6841dd23867f07c62d74fb205 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/6880 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DFETNOGRAFANDO A TUTELA COLETIVA PELO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DE DIREITOS DE POPULAÇÕES TRADICIONAIS. REFLEXÕES INICIAIS SOBRE CIDADANIA A PARTIR DO CASO DO SANTUÁRIO SAGRADO DOS PAJÉS, EM BRASÍLIA/DFMinistério PúblicoCidadaniahipossuficiênciatutela coletivadireitos indígenasPublic Ministrycitizenshiphyposufficiencycollective guardianshipindigenous rightsThis paper addresses, based on elements of broader ethnographic research, the participation of the Ministério Público Federal - MPF (Public Ministry) in the judicial recognition of the Sacred Sanctuary of the Pajés, located in Brasília, as a traditionally occupied indigenous land. The recognition took place in a lawsuit proposed by the MPF/DF (Federal Public Ministry of the Federal District), which continues to follow the case. An analysis is proposed from the perspective of the anthropology of law, which allows for a deep theoretical approach to the theme of rights enforcement. The participation of the MPF is examined through the native category of "collective guardianship" (tutela coletiva) which designates the defense of collective rights, shedding light on the tutelary characteristic of this role of the MPF. The MPF acts supported not only by the idea of "hipossuficiência" (lack of power or vulnerability), which underpins the institutional function of the organization but also, paradoxically, by the discourse of respecting the viewpoint of those involved. However, this role is strained by the protagonism of the indigenous community in defending its interests. Consequently, there is a dissonance between the discourse and the institutional practice, with implications for the conflict management process.O trabalho aborda, valendo-se de elementos de pesquisa etnográfica mais ampla, a participação do MPF no reconhecimento judicial do Santuário Sagrado dos Pajés, situado no plano piloto de Brasília, como terra indígena tradicionalmente ocupada. O reconhecimento ocorreu em ação proposta pelo MPF/DF, que segue acompanhando o caso.Propõe-se uma análise a partir da antropologia do direito, cuja perspectiva permite uma abordagem teórica densa da temática da efetivação de direitos. São considerados, nessa perspectiva, os sentidos de cidadania no Brasil e da tensão entre duas concepções de igualdade (CARDOSO DE OLIVEIRA, 2018), uma que a concebe como tratamento uniforme e outra como tratamento diferenciado.A participação do MPF é examinada pela categoria nativa tutela coletiva, que designa a defesa de direitos coletivos, jogando-se luz na característica tutelar dessa atuação do Ministério Público (MOTA; MOUZINHO). O MPF age amparado tanto na ideia de hipossuficiência, que fundamenta a função institucional do órgão, como também, paradoxalmente, no discurso de respeito ao ponto de vista dos envolvidos, sendo essa atuação tensionada pelo protagonismo da comunidade indígena na defesa de seus interesses. Vislumbra-se, nesse sentido, dissintonia entre o discurso e a prática institucional, com consequências ao processo de administração do conflito.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2023-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/688010.1590/SciELOPreprints.6880porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/6880/13042Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina Penna Nocchihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNocchi, Carolina Pennareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)instacron:SCI2023-09-18T21:33:29Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/6880Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2023-09-18T21:33:29SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF ETNOGRAFANDO A TUTELA COLETIVA PELO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DE DIREITOS DE POPULAÇÕES TRADICIONAIS. REFLEXÕES INICIAIS SOBRE CIDADANIA A PARTIR DO CASO DO SANTUÁRIO SAGRADO DOS PAJÉS, EM BRASÍLIA/DF |
title |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF |
spellingShingle |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF Nocchi, Carolina Penna Ministério Público Cidadania hipossuficiência tutela coletiva direitos indígenas Public Ministry citizenship hyposufficiency collective guardianship indigenous rights |
title_short |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF |
title_full |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF |
title_fullStr |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF |
title_full_unstemmed |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF |
title_sort |
“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF |
author |
Nocchi, Carolina Penna |
author_facet |
Nocchi, Carolina Penna |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nocchi, Carolina Penna |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ministério Público Cidadania hipossuficiência tutela coletiva direitos indígenas Public Ministry citizenship hyposufficiency collective guardianship indigenous rights |
topic |
Ministério Público Cidadania hipossuficiência tutela coletiva direitos indígenas Public Ministry citizenship hyposufficiency collective guardianship indigenous rights |
description |
This paper addresses, based on elements of broader ethnographic research, the participation of the Ministério Público Federal - MPF (Public Ministry) in the judicial recognition of the Sacred Sanctuary of the Pajés, located in Brasília, as a traditionally occupied indigenous land. The recognition took place in a lawsuit proposed by the MPF/DF (Federal Public Ministry of the Federal District), which continues to follow the case. An analysis is proposed from the perspective of the anthropology of law, which allows for a deep theoretical approach to the theme of rights enforcement. The participation of the MPF is examined through the native category of "collective guardianship" (tutela coletiva) which designates the defense of collective rights, shedding light on the tutelary characteristic of this role of the MPF. The MPF acts supported not only by the idea of "hipossuficiência" (lack of power or vulnerability), which underpins the institutional function of the organization but also, paradoxically, by the discourse of respecting the viewpoint of those involved. However, this role is strained by the protagonism of the indigenous community in defending its interests. Consequently, there is a dissonance between the discourse and the institutional practice, with implications for the conflict management process. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6880 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.6880 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6880 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.6880 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/6880/13042 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina Penna Nocchi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina Penna Nocchi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047812979949568 |