“COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nocchi, Carolina Penna
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6880
Resumo: This paper addresses, based on elements of broader ethnographic research, the participation of the Ministério Público Federal - MPF (Public Ministry) in the judicial recognition of the Sacred Sanctuary of the Pajés, located in Brasília, as a traditionally occupied indigenous land. The recognition took place in a lawsuit proposed by the MPF/DF (Federal Public Ministry of the Federal District), which continues to follow the case. An analysis is proposed from the perspective of the anthropology of law, which allows for a deep theoretical approach to the theme of rights enforcement. The participation of the MPF is examined through the native category of "collective guardianship" (tutela coletiva) which designates the defense of collective rights, shedding light on the tutelary characteristic of this role of the MPF. The MPF acts supported not only by the idea of "hipossuficiência" (lack of power or vulnerability), which underpins the institutional function of the organization but also, paradoxically, by the discourse of respecting the viewpoint of those involved. However, this role is strained by the protagonism of the indigenous community in defending its interests. Consequently, there is a dissonance between the discourse and the institutional practice, with implications for the conflict management process.
id SCI-1_40bb1cd6841dd23867f07c62d74fb205
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/6880
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DFETNOGRAFANDO A TUTELA COLETIVA PELO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DE DIREITOS DE POPULAÇÕES TRADICIONAIS. REFLEXÕES INICIAIS SOBRE CIDADANIA A PARTIR DO CASO DO SANTUÁRIO SAGRADO DOS PAJÉS, EM BRASÍLIA/DFMinistério PúblicoCidadaniahipossuficiênciatutela coletivadireitos indígenasPublic Ministrycitizenshiphyposufficiencycollective guardianshipindigenous rightsThis paper addresses, based on elements of broader ethnographic research, the participation of the Ministério Público Federal - MPF (Public Ministry) in the judicial recognition of the Sacred Sanctuary of the Pajés, located in Brasília, as a traditionally occupied indigenous land. The recognition took place in a lawsuit proposed by the MPF/DF (Federal Public Ministry of the Federal District), which continues to follow the case. An analysis is proposed from the perspective of the anthropology of law, which allows for a deep theoretical approach to the theme of rights enforcement. The participation of the MPF is examined through the native category of "collective guardianship" (tutela coletiva) which designates the defense of collective rights, shedding light on the tutelary characteristic of this role of the MPF. The MPF acts supported not only by the idea of "hipossuficiência" (lack of power or vulnerability), which underpins the institutional function of the organization but also, paradoxically, by the discourse of respecting the viewpoint of those involved. However, this role is strained by the protagonism of the indigenous community in defending its interests. Consequently, there is a dissonance between the discourse and the institutional practice, with implications for the conflict management process.O trabalho aborda, valendo-se de elementos de pesquisa etnográfica mais ampla, a participação do MPF no reconhecimento judicial do Santuário Sagrado dos Pajés, situado no plano piloto de Brasília, como terra indígena tradicionalmente ocupada. O reconhecimento ocorreu em ação proposta pelo MPF/DF, que segue acompanhando o caso.Propõe-se uma análise a partir da antropologia do direito, cuja perspectiva permite uma abordagem teórica densa da temática da efetivação de direitos. São considerados, nessa perspectiva, os sentidos de cidadania no Brasil e da tensão entre duas concepções de igualdade (CARDOSO DE OLIVEIRA, 2018), uma que a concebe como tratamento uniforme e outra como tratamento diferenciado.A participação do MPF é examinada pela categoria nativa tutela coletiva, que designa a defesa de direitos coletivos, jogando-se luz na característica tutelar dessa atuação do Ministério Público (MOTA; MOUZINHO). O MPF age amparado tanto na ideia de hipossuficiência, que fundamenta a função institucional do órgão, como também, paradoxalmente, no discurso de respeito ao ponto de vista dos envolvidos, sendo essa atuação tensionada pelo protagonismo da comunidade indígena na defesa de seus interesses. Vislumbra-se, nesse sentido, dissintonia entre o discurso e a prática institucional, com consequências ao processo de administração do conflito.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2023-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/688010.1590/SciELOPreprints.6880porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/6880/13042Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina Penna Nocchihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNocchi, Carolina Pennareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)instacron:SCI2023-09-18T21:33:29Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/6880Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2023-09-18T21:33:29SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
ETNOGRAFANDO A TUTELA COLETIVA PELO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DE DIREITOS DE POPULAÇÕES TRADICIONAIS. REFLEXÕES INICIAIS SOBRE CIDADANIA A PARTIR DO CASO DO SANTUÁRIO SAGRADO DOS PAJÉS, EM BRASÍLIA/DF
title “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
spellingShingle “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
Nocchi, Carolina Penna
Ministério Público
Cidadania
hipossuficiência
tutela coletiva
direitos indígenas
Public Ministry
citizenship
hyposufficiency
collective guardianship
indigenous rights
title_short “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
title_full “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
title_fullStr “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
title_full_unstemmed “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
title_sort “COLLECTIVE GUARDIANSHIP” BY THE FEDERAL PUBLIC MINISTRY ON THE RIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL POPULATIONS. INITIAL REFLECTIONS ON CITIZENSHIP FROM THE CASE OF THE SACRED SANTUÁRIO DOS PAJÉS, IN BRASÍLIA/DF
author Nocchi, Carolina Penna
author_facet Nocchi, Carolina Penna
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nocchi, Carolina Penna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ministério Público
Cidadania
hipossuficiência
tutela coletiva
direitos indígenas
Public Ministry
citizenship
hyposufficiency
collective guardianship
indigenous rights
topic Ministério Público
Cidadania
hipossuficiência
tutela coletiva
direitos indígenas
Public Ministry
citizenship
hyposufficiency
collective guardianship
indigenous rights
description This paper addresses, based on elements of broader ethnographic research, the participation of the Ministério Público Federal - MPF (Public Ministry) in the judicial recognition of the Sacred Sanctuary of the Pajés, located in Brasília, as a traditionally occupied indigenous land. The recognition took place in a lawsuit proposed by the MPF/DF (Federal Public Ministry of the Federal District), which continues to follow the case. An analysis is proposed from the perspective of the anthropology of law, which allows for a deep theoretical approach to the theme of rights enforcement. The participation of the MPF is examined through the native category of "collective guardianship" (tutela coletiva) which designates the defense of collective rights, shedding light on the tutelary characteristic of this role of the MPF. The MPF acts supported not only by the idea of "hipossuficiência" (lack of power or vulnerability), which underpins the institutional function of the organization but also, paradoxically, by the discourse of respecting the viewpoint of those involved. However, this role is strained by the protagonism of the indigenous community in defending its interests. Consequently, there is a dissonance between the discourse and the institutional practice, with implications for the conflict management process.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6880
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.6880
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6880
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.6880
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/6880/13042
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina Penna Nocchi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Carolina Penna Nocchi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
instacron:SCI
instname_str Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047812979949568