The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Taís
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4079
Resumo: After the eruption of May 68 and the creation of the University Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reevaluated his theoretical-political conceptions, as well as his ties to philosopher Louis Althusser and the intellectuals of the Cercle d’Ulm. The dichotomy between a supposedly scientific kind of knowledge, the marxian theory, and ideology, as the Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of valuing the boiling political movements of the 1960s. In the present essay, we are going to analyze this moment of Rancière’s path where the author goes from Althusser’s follower to his critic, by reframing his comprehension about the meaning of social revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate unfolded in texts like Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser and La leçon d’Althusser is not something circumstantial in Rancière’s oeuvre, first appearing as a question striking his thought and still contemplates his current writings: the refusal to the division of knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards the conception that politics, to erupt according to the expectations of a certain critical intellectuality, would require the theory as a prerequisite.
id SCI-1_a63f0343ceef914539f71c333cdeb468
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4079
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardyLos efectos del Mayo del 68 en la trayectoria de Jacques Rancière: la dicotomía althusseriana entre la ciencia y la ideología puesta en jaqueOs efeitos de Maio de 68 na trajetória de Jacques Rancière: a dicotomia althusseriana entre ciência e ideologia colocada em xequeRancièreAlthusserciênciaideologiapolíticaRancièreAlthusserscienceideologypoliticsRancièreAlthussercienciaideologíapolíticaAfter the eruption of May 68 and the creation of the University Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reevaluated his theoretical-political conceptions, as well as his ties to philosopher Louis Althusser and the intellectuals of the Cercle d’Ulm. The dichotomy between a supposedly scientific kind of knowledge, the marxian theory, and ideology, as the Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of valuing the boiling political movements of the 1960s. In the present essay, we are going to analyze this moment of Rancière’s path where the author goes from Althusser’s follower to his critic, by reframing his comprehension about the meaning of social revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate unfolded in texts like Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser and La leçon d’Althusser is not something circumstantial in Rancière’s oeuvre, first appearing as a question striking his thought and still contemplates his current writings: the refusal to the division of knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards the conception that politics, to erupt according to the expectations of a certain critical intellectuality, would require the theory as a prerequisite.Tras la eclosión de Mayo del 68 y la creación de la Universidad de Vincennes, Jacques Rancière replanteó sus concepciones político-teóricas, como también su vínculo con el filósofo Louis Althusser y los intelectuales del Cercle d’Ulm. La dicotomía entre un tipo de conocimiento supuestamente científico, la teoría marxista y la ideología, como sostenían los althusserianos, es puesta en jaque a favor del reconocimiento de movimientos políticos irruptores de los años 60. En el presente artículo, investigaremos ese momento en la trayectoria de Rancière en la cual el autor pasa de ser seguidor a crítico de Althusser, reformulando su comprensión a respecto del significado de las revueltas sociales y su concepción del conocimiento. Esta discusión, que se despliega en textos como Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser y La leçon d’Althusser no es algo circunstancial en la obra de Rancière, sino que se manifiesta como un punto que recurre su pensamiento y se observa aún en sus escritos actuales: el rechazo a la división del saber y sus jerarquías intelectuales y la desconfianza ante la concepción de que la política, para eclosionar según las expectativas de una cierta intelectualidad crítica, necesitaría de la teoría como requisito previo.Após a eclosão de Maio de 68 e a criação da Universidade de Vincennes,  Jacques Rancière reavaliou suas concepções teórico-políticas, assim como seu vínculo com o filósofo Louis Althusser e os intelectuais do Cercle d’Ulm. A dicotomia entre um tipo de conhecimento supostamente científico, a teoria marxiana, e a ideologia, tal como sustentavam os althusserianos, é colocada em xeque em favor de uma valorização dos movimentos políticos irruptivos dos anos 1960. No presente artigo, analisaremos esse momento da trajetória de Rancière em que o autor passa de seguidor a crítico de Althusser, ao reformular sua compreensão a respeito do significado das revoltas sociais e da sua concepção sobre o saber. Esse debate desdobrado em textos como Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser e La leçon d’Althusser não é algo circunstancial na obra de Rancière, antes aparece como uma questão que atravessa seu pensamento e contempla ainda seus escritos atuais: a recusa à divisão do saber e a suas hierarquias intelectuais e a desconfiança em relação à concepção de que a política, para eclodir de acordo com as expectativas de certa intelectualidade crítica, necessitaria da teoria como seu pré-requisito.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-05-23info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/407910.1590/SciELOPreprints.4079porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4079/7836Copyright (c) 2022 Taís Araújohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Taísreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-05-17T11:14:38Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4079Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-05-17T11:14:38SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
Los efectos del Mayo del 68 en la trayectoria de Jacques Rancière: la dicotomía althusseriana entre la ciencia y la ideología puesta en jaque
Os efeitos de Maio de 68 na trajetória de Jacques Rancière: a dicotomia althusseriana entre ciência e ideologia colocada em xeque
title The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
spellingShingle The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
Araújo, Taís
Rancière
Althusser
ciência
ideologia
política
Rancière
Althusser
science
ideology
politics
Rancière
Althusser
ciencia
ideología
política
title_short The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
title_full The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
title_fullStr The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
title_full_unstemmed The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
title_sort The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
author Araújo, Taís
author_facet Araújo, Taís
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, Taís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rancière
Althusser
ciência
ideologia
política
Rancière
Althusser
science
ideology
politics
Rancière
Althusser
ciencia
ideología
política
topic Rancière
Althusser
ciência
ideologia
política
Rancière
Althusser
science
ideology
politics
Rancière
Althusser
ciencia
ideología
política
description After the eruption of May 68 and the creation of the University Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reevaluated his theoretical-political conceptions, as well as his ties to philosopher Louis Althusser and the intellectuals of the Cercle d’Ulm. The dichotomy between a supposedly scientific kind of knowledge, the marxian theory, and ideology, as the Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of valuing the boiling political movements of the 1960s. In the present essay, we are going to analyze this moment of Rancière’s path where the author goes from Althusser’s follower to his critic, by reframing his comprehension about the meaning of social revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate unfolded in texts like Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser and La leçon d’Althusser is not something circumstantial in Rancière’s oeuvre, first appearing as a question striking his thought and still contemplates his current writings: the refusal to the division of knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards the conception that politics, to erupt according to the expectations of a certain critical intellectuality, would require the theory as a prerequisite.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4079
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4079
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4079
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4079
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4079/7836
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Taís Araújo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Taís Araújo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047828483145728

Registros relacionados