The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4079 |
Resumo: | After the eruption of May 68 and the creation of the University Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reevaluated his theoretical-political conceptions, as well as his ties to philosopher Louis Althusser and the intellectuals of the Cercle d’Ulm. The dichotomy between a supposedly scientific kind of knowledge, the marxian theory, and ideology, as the Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of valuing the boiling political movements of the 1960s. In the present essay, we are going to analyze this moment of Rancière’s path where the author goes from Althusser’s follower to his critic, by reframing his comprehension about the meaning of social revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate unfolded in texts like Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser and La leçon d’Althusser is not something circumstantial in Rancière’s oeuvre, first appearing as a question striking his thought and still contemplates his current writings: the refusal to the division of knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards the conception that politics, to erupt according to the expectations of a certain critical intellectuality, would require the theory as a prerequisite. |
id |
SCI-1_a63f0343ceef914539f71c333cdeb468 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4079 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardyLos efectos del Mayo del 68 en la trayectoria de Jacques Rancière: la dicotomía althusseriana entre la ciencia y la ideología puesta en jaqueOs efeitos de Maio de 68 na trajetória de Jacques Rancière: a dicotomia althusseriana entre ciência e ideologia colocada em xequeRancièreAlthusserciênciaideologiapolíticaRancièreAlthusserscienceideologypoliticsRancièreAlthussercienciaideologíapolíticaAfter the eruption of May 68 and the creation of the University Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reevaluated his theoretical-political conceptions, as well as his ties to philosopher Louis Althusser and the intellectuals of the Cercle d’Ulm. The dichotomy between a supposedly scientific kind of knowledge, the marxian theory, and ideology, as the Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of valuing the boiling political movements of the 1960s. In the present essay, we are going to analyze this moment of Rancière’s path where the author goes from Althusser’s follower to his critic, by reframing his comprehension about the meaning of social revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate unfolded in texts like Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser and La leçon d’Althusser is not something circumstantial in Rancière’s oeuvre, first appearing as a question striking his thought and still contemplates his current writings: the refusal to the division of knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards the conception that politics, to erupt according to the expectations of a certain critical intellectuality, would require the theory as a prerequisite.Tras la eclosión de Mayo del 68 y la creación de la Universidad de Vincennes, Jacques Rancière replanteó sus concepciones político-teóricas, como también su vínculo con el filósofo Louis Althusser y los intelectuales del Cercle d’Ulm. La dicotomía entre un tipo de conocimiento supuestamente científico, la teoría marxista y la ideología, como sostenían los althusserianos, es puesta en jaque a favor del reconocimiento de movimientos políticos irruptores de los años 60. En el presente artículo, investigaremos ese momento en la trayectoria de Rancière en la cual el autor pasa de ser seguidor a crítico de Althusser, reformulando su comprensión a respecto del significado de las revueltas sociales y su concepción del conocimiento. Esta discusión, que se despliega en textos como Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser y La leçon d’Althusser no es algo circunstancial en la obra de Rancière, sino que se manifiesta como un punto que recurre su pensamiento y se observa aún en sus escritos actuales: el rechazo a la división del saber y sus jerarquías intelectuales y la desconfianza ante la concepción de que la política, para eclosionar según las expectativas de una cierta intelectualidad crítica, necesitaría de la teoría como requisito previo.Após a eclosão de Maio de 68 e a criação da Universidade de Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reavaliou suas concepções teórico-políticas, assim como seu vínculo com o filósofo Louis Althusser e os intelectuais do Cercle d’Ulm. A dicotomia entre um tipo de conhecimento supostamente científico, a teoria marxiana, e a ideologia, tal como sustentavam os althusserianos, é colocada em xeque em favor de uma valorização dos movimentos políticos irruptivos dos anos 1960. No presente artigo, analisaremos esse momento da trajetória de Rancière em que o autor passa de seguidor a crítico de Althusser, ao reformular sua compreensão a respeito do significado das revoltas sociais e da sua concepção sobre o saber. Esse debate desdobrado em textos como Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser e La leçon d’Althusser não é algo circunstancial na obra de Rancière, antes aparece como uma questão que atravessa seu pensamento e contempla ainda seus escritos atuais: a recusa à divisão do saber e a suas hierarquias intelectuais e a desconfiança em relação à concepção de que a política, para eclodir de acordo com as expectativas de certa intelectualidade crítica, necessitaria da teoria como seu pré-requisito.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-05-23info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/407910.1590/SciELOPreprints.4079porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4079/7836Copyright (c) 2022 Taís Araújohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Taísreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-05-17T11:14:38Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4079Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-05-17T11:14:38SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy Los efectos del Mayo del 68 en la trayectoria de Jacques Rancière: la dicotomía althusseriana entre la ciencia y la ideología puesta en jaque Os efeitos de Maio de 68 na trajetória de Jacques Rancière: a dicotomia althusseriana entre ciência e ideologia colocada em xeque |
title |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy |
spellingShingle |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy Araújo, Taís Rancière Althusser ciência ideologia política Rancière Althusser science ideology politics Rancière Althusser ciencia ideología política |
title_short |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy |
title_full |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy |
title_fullStr |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy |
title_sort |
The effects of May 68 in Jacques Rancière’s path: the Althusserian dichotomy between science and ideology put in jeopardy |
author |
Araújo, Taís |
author_facet |
Araújo, Taís |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Taís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rancière Althusser ciência ideologia política Rancière Althusser science ideology politics Rancière Althusser ciencia ideología política |
topic |
Rancière Althusser ciência ideologia política Rancière Althusser science ideology politics Rancière Althusser ciencia ideología política |
description |
After the eruption of May 68 and the creation of the University Vincennes, Jacques Rancière reevaluated his theoretical-political conceptions, as well as his ties to philosopher Louis Althusser and the intellectuals of the Cercle d’Ulm. The dichotomy between a supposedly scientific kind of knowledge, the marxian theory, and ideology, as the Althusserians supported, is jeopardized in favor of valuing the boiling political movements of the 1960s. In the present essay, we are going to analyze this moment of Rancière’s path where the author goes from Althusser’s follower to his critic, by reframing his comprehension about the meaning of social revolt and the conception of knowledge. This debate unfolded in texts like Sur la théorie de l’idéologie: politique d’Althusser and La leçon d’Althusser is not something circumstantial in Rancière’s oeuvre, first appearing as a question striking his thought and still contemplates his current writings: the refusal to the division of knowledge and its intellectual hierarchies and the suspicion towards the conception that politics, to erupt according to the expectations of a certain critical intellectuality, would require the theory as a prerequisite. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4079 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4079 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4079 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4079 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4079/7836 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Taís Araújo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Taís Araújo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047828483145728 |