Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lucas, Thabata Coaglio
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1546
Resumo: ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the protocols on decontamination/reuse of N95 masks available in the literature in times of the Covid-19 pandemic.Method: Integrative literature review, in the period from 2010 to 2020, on the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, SAGE journals,Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Wiley, with the descriptors Masks AND Respiratory protective devices; Mask OR N95 AND Covid-19; N95 AND Respirators; Decontamination AND N95 AND Coronavirus; Facemask OR Pandemic.Results: Twelve studies were included, of which 3 (30.0%) used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and indicated mask deterioration between 2 and 10 cycles, 4 (40.0%) used hydrogen peroxide vapor, and seal loss varied from 5 to 20 cycles, 4 (33.3%) evaluated the structural integrity of the N95 mask through visual inspection and 6 (54.4%), its filtration efficiency.Conclusion: Reuse strategies to overcome a shortage of devices in the face of the pandemic challenge the current concept for good practices in health-product processing. Keywords: Masks. Respiratory protective devices. Decontamination. Coronavirus. Coronavirus infections. Pandemics.
id SCI-1_bec97357b4e904cf78b2f89a1a2d8867
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1546
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review¿Es posible descontaminar las máscaras N95 en tiempos pandémicos? revisión integrativa de la literaturaÉ possível a descontaminação de máscaras N95 em tempos de pandemia? revisão integrativa da literaturaMáscarasDispositivos de proteção respiratóriaDescontaminaçãoCoronavírusInfecções por coronavírusPandemiasMasksRespiratory protective devicesDecontaminationCoronavirusCoronavirus infectionsPandemicsMáscarasDispositivos de protección respiratoriaDescontaminaciónCoronavirusInfecciones por coronavirusPandemiasABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the protocols on decontamination/reuse of N95 masks available in the literature in times of the Covid-19 pandemic.Method: Integrative literature review, in the period from 2010 to 2020, on the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, SAGE journals,Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Wiley, with the descriptors Masks AND Respiratory protective devices; Mask OR N95 AND Covid-19; N95 AND Respirators; Decontamination AND N95 AND Coronavirus; Facemask OR Pandemic.Results: Twelve studies were included, of which 3 (30.0%) used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and indicated mask deterioration between 2 and 10 cycles, 4 (40.0%) used hydrogen peroxide vapor, and seal loss varied from 5 to 20 cycles, 4 (33.3%) evaluated the structural integrity of the N95 mask through visual inspection and 6 (54.4%), its filtration efficiency.Conclusion: Reuse strategies to overcome a shortage of devices in the face of the pandemic challenge the current concept for good practices in health-product processing. Keywords: Masks. Respiratory protective devices. Decontamination. Coronavirus. Coronavirus infections. Pandemics.RESUMENObjetivo: Evaluar, en la literatura, los protocolos disponibles sobre descontaminación / reutilización de máscaras N95 en tiempos de pandemia de Covid-19.Método: Revisión integrativa, en el período 2010 a 2020 en las bases de datos MEDLINE / PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, SAGE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase y Wiley, con los descriptores Máscaras y Dispositivos de protección respiratoria; Máscara O N95 Y Covid-19; N95 Y Respiradores; Descontaminación Y N95 Y Coronavirus; Mascarilla O Pandemia.Resultados: Se incluyeron doce artículos, de los cuales 3 (30,0%) usó irradiación germicida ultravioleta e indicó deterioro de la máscara entre 2 y 10 ciclos, 4 (40,0%) utilizó vapor de peróxido de hidrógeno y la pérdida del sello varió de 5 a 20 ciclos, 4 (33,3%) evaluó la integridad estructural a través de la inspección visual y 6 (54,4%), la eficiencia de filtración de la máscara N95. Conclusión: Las estrategias de reutilización para abordar la escasez de dispositivos frente a la pandemia desafían el concepto actual de buenas prácticas en el procesamiento de productos de salud. Palabras clave: Máscaras. Dispositivos de protección respiratoria. Descontaminación. Coronavirus. Infecciones por coronavirus. Pandemias.RESUMOObjetivo: Avaliar, na literatura, os protocolos disponíveis sobre descontaminação/reutilização das máscaras N95 em tempos de pandemia da Covid-19.Método: Revisão integrativa, no período de 2010 a 2020 nas bases de dados MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, SAGE journals,Web of Science, Scopus, Embase e Wiley, com os descritores Masks AND Respiratory protective devices; Mask OR N95 AND Covid-19; N95 AND Respirators; Decontamination AND N95 AND Coronavirus; Facemask OR Pandemic.Resultados: Incluíram-se 12 estudos, dos quais 3 (30,0%) utilizaram irradiação germicida ultravioleta e indicaram deterioração da máscara entre 2 a 10 ciclos, 4 (40,0%) utilizaram o vapor de peróxido de hidrogênio e a perda da vedação variou de 5 a 20 ciclos, 4 (33,3%) avaliaram a integridade estrutural por meio de inspeção visual e 6 (54,4%), a eficiência da filtração da máscara N95.Conclusão: Estratégias de reutilização para suprir a escassez de dispositivos diante da pandemia desafiam o conceito vigente para as boas práticas do processamento de produtos para saúde.Palavras-chave: Máscaras. Dispositivos de proteção respiratória. Descontaminação. Coronavírus. Infecções por coronavírus. Pandemias.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/154610.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200146porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1546/2446Copyright (c) 2020 Adriana Cristina de Oliveira, Thabata Coaglio Lucashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Adriana Cristina de Lucas, Thabata Coaglio reponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-12-07T13:47:45Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1546Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-12-07T13:47:45SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
¿Es posible descontaminar las máscaras N95 en tiempos pandémicos? revisión integrativa de la literatura
É possível a descontaminação de máscaras N95 em tempos de pandemia? revisão integrativa da literatura
title Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
spellingShingle Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
Máscaras
Dispositivos de proteção respiratória
Descontaminação
Coronavírus
Infecções por coronavírus
Pandemias
Masks
Respiratory protective devices
Decontamination
Coronavirus
Coronavirus infections
Pandemics
Máscaras
Dispositivos de protección respiratoria
Descontaminación
Coronavirus
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
title_short Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
title_full Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
title_fullStr Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
title_sort Is it possible to decontaminate N95 masks in pandemic times? integrative literature review
author Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
author_facet Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
Lucas, Thabata Coaglio
author_role author
author2 Lucas, Thabata Coaglio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Adriana Cristina de
Lucas, Thabata Coaglio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Máscaras
Dispositivos de proteção respiratória
Descontaminação
Coronavírus
Infecções por coronavírus
Pandemias
Masks
Respiratory protective devices
Decontamination
Coronavirus
Coronavirus infections
Pandemics
Máscaras
Dispositivos de protección respiratoria
Descontaminación
Coronavirus
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
topic Máscaras
Dispositivos de proteção respiratória
Descontaminação
Coronavírus
Infecções por coronavírus
Pandemias
Masks
Respiratory protective devices
Decontamination
Coronavirus
Coronavirus infections
Pandemics
Máscaras
Dispositivos de protección respiratoria
Descontaminación
Coronavirus
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
description ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the protocols on decontamination/reuse of N95 masks available in the literature in times of the Covid-19 pandemic.Method: Integrative literature review, in the period from 2010 to 2020, on the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, SAGE journals,Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Wiley, with the descriptors Masks AND Respiratory protective devices; Mask OR N95 AND Covid-19; N95 AND Respirators; Decontamination AND N95 AND Coronavirus; Facemask OR Pandemic.Results: Twelve studies were included, of which 3 (30.0%) used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and indicated mask deterioration between 2 and 10 cycles, 4 (40.0%) used hydrogen peroxide vapor, and seal loss varied from 5 to 20 cycles, 4 (33.3%) evaluated the structural integrity of the N95 mask through visual inspection and 6 (54.4%), its filtration efficiency.Conclusion: Reuse strategies to overcome a shortage of devices in the face of the pandemic challenge the current concept for good practices in health-product processing. Keywords: Masks. Respiratory protective devices. Decontamination. Coronavirus. Coronavirus infections. Pandemics.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1546
10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200146
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1546
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200146
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1546/2446
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Adriana Cristina de Oliveira, Thabata Coaglio Lucas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Adriana Cristina de Oliveira, Thabata Coaglio Lucas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047820836929536