Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Iago Torres Cortês de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pestana, Aylla Mesquita, Pavanello, Larissa, Franz-Montan, Michelle, Cogo-Müller, Karina
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2496
Resumo: Objective: To describe the recommendations, physical characteristics, methods of disinfection and the effectiveness of using homemade masks in reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Methods: Search was performed in the MEDLINE, SciELO and Google Scholar databases, in addition to the official recommendations for use. Results: 31 references were included. The filtration capacity of tissues varied between 5 and 98%. 100% cotton fabrics in two or three layers showed filtration efficiency between 70 and 99%, in vitro. Homemade masks, surgical and respirators showed breathability between 2.2 to 3.0 Pascal. The ability to reduce the spread of microorganisms by people wearing home masks was three times less than when using surgical masks, but it was superior to not wearing masks. Conclusion: The breathability of homemade masks may be adequate, while the filtration efficiency seems to be inferior to surgical masks, but superior to no mask use. There is no evidence to support the efficacy and effectiveness of homemade masks.
id SCI-1_dbc1f6e25ea3531241c0a3d361f46dda
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/2496
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of useMascarillas caseras en la pandemia de COVID-19: recomendaciones, características físicas, desinfección y eficacia de usoMáscaras caseiras na pandemia de COVID-19: recomendações, características físicas, desinfecção e eficácia de uso BetacoronavírusInfecções por CoronavírusInfecções RespiratóriasMáscaras FaciaisDispositivos de Proteção RespiratóriaRevisãoBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsFacial MasksRespiratory Protective DevicesReviewObjective: To describe the recommendations, physical characteristics, methods of disinfection and the effectiveness of using homemade masks in reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Methods: Search was performed in the MEDLINE, SciELO and Google Scholar databases, in addition to the official recommendations for use. Results: 31 references were included. The filtration capacity of tissues varied between 5 and 98%. 100% cotton fabrics in two or three layers showed filtration efficiency between 70 and 99%, in vitro. Homemade masks, surgical and respirators showed breathability between 2.2 to 3.0 Pascal. The ability to reduce the spread of microorganisms by people wearing home masks was three times less than when using surgical masks, but it was superior to not wearing masks. Conclusion: The breathability of homemade masks may be adequate, while the filtration efficiency seems to be inferior to surgical masks, but superior to no mask use. There is no evidence to support the efficacy and effectiveness of homemade masks.Objetivo: Descrever as recomendações, características físicas, métodos de desinfecção e eficácia de uso de máscaras caseiras na redução da transmissão da COVID-19. Métodos: Realizou-se busca nas bases de dados MEDLINE, SciELO e Google Scholar, além das recomendações oficiais de uso. Resultados: Foram incluídas 31 referências. A capacidade de filtração de tecidos variou entre 5 e 98%. Tecidos 100% algodão em duas ou três camadas apresentaram eficácia de filtração entre 70 e 99% em estudos in vitro. Máscaras caseiras, cirúrgicas e respiradores apresentaram respirabilidade entre 2,2 e 3,0 Pascal. A capacidade de redução da propagação de microrganismos por pessoas usando máscaras caseiras foi três vezes menor do que ao usar máscaras cirúrgicas, embora tenha sido superior ao não uso de máscaras. Conclusão: A respirabilidade de máscaras caseiras mostrou-se adequada, enquanto a eficácia de filtração parece ser inferior à das máscaras cirúrgicas, mas superior a não usar máscara. Não há evidências que respaldem a eficácia e efetividade das máscaras caseiras. SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2021-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/249610.1590/s1679-49742021000400003porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/2496/4281Copyright (c) 2021 Iago Torres Cortês de Sousa, Aylla Mesquita Pestana, Larissa Pavanello, Michelle Franz-Montan, Karina Cogo-Müllerhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa, Iago Torres Cortês de Pestana, Aylla Mesquita Pavanello, Larissa Franz-Montan, Michelle Cogo-Müller, Karina reponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2021-06-22T17:42:16Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/2496Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2021-06-22T17:42:16SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
Mascarillas caseras en la pandemia de COVID-19: recomendaciones, características físicas, desinfección y eficacia de uso
Máscaras caseiras na pandemia de COVID-19: recomendações, características físicas, desinfecção e eficácia de uso
title Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
spellingShingle Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
Sousa, Iago Torres Cortês de
Betacoronavírus
Infecções por Coronavírus
Infecções Respiratórias
Máscaras Faciais
Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória
Revisão
Betacoronavirus
Coronavirus Infections
Respiratory Tract Infections
Facial Masks
Respiratory Protective Devices
Review
title_short Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
title_full Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
title_fullStr Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
title_full_unstemmed Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
title_sort Homemade masks in the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations, physical characteristics, disinfection and efficacy of use
author Sousa, Iago Torres Cortês de
author_facet Sousa, Iago Torres Cortês de
Pestana, Aylla Mesquita
Pavanello, Larissa
Franz-Montan, Michelle
Cogo-Müller, Karina
author_role author
author2 Pestana, Aylla Mesquita
Pavanello, Larissa
Franz-Montan, Michelle
Cogo-Müller, Karina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Iago Torres Cortês de
Pestana, Aylla Mesquita
Pavanello, Larissa
Franz-Montan, Michelle
Cogo-Müller, Karina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Betacoronavírus
Infecções por Coronavírus
Infecções Respiratórias
Máscaras Faciais
Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória
Revisão
Betacoronavirus
Coronavirus Infections
Respiratory Tract Infections
Facial Masks
Respiratory Protective Devices
Review
topic Betacoronavírus
Infecções por Coronavírus
Infecções Respiratórias
Máscaras Faciais
Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória
Revisão
Betacoronavirus
Coronavirus Infections
Respiratory Tract Infections
Facial Masks
Respiratory Protective Devices
Review
description Objective: To describe the recommendations, physical characteristics, methods of disinfection and the effectiveness of using homemade masks in reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Methods: Search was performed in the MEDLINE, SciELO and Google Scholar databases, in addition to the official recommendations for use. Results: 31 references were included. The filtration capacity of tissues varied between 5 and 98%. 100% cotton fabrics in two or three layers showed filtration efficiency between 70 and 99%, in vitro. Homemade masks, surgical and respirators showed breathability between 2.2 to 3.0 Pascal. The ability to reduce the spread of microorganisms by people wearing home masks was three times less than when using surgical masks, but it was superior to not wearing masks. Conclusion: The breathability of homemade masks may be adequate, while the filtration efficiency seems to be inferior to surgical masks, but superior to no mask use. There is no evidence to support the efficacy and effectiveness of homemade masks.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2496
10.1590/s1679-49742021000400003
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2496
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1679-49742021000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/2496/4281
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047816471707648