THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Fernando Xavier
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Barbosa, Elizabete Pereira, Mendes, Valdelaine da Rosa, Santos, Ana Lúcia Felix dos
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2897
Resumo: This paper aims to analyse how three types of review studies (literature review, systematic review, and bibliometric studies) are approached in researches on educational knowledge production. Here, review studies are understood as those dedicated to mapping the production of knowledge, seeking to problematize trends and challenges, but also seeking to signal new demands from a given academic area and the methodological research lines. The methodology involved selecting 12 papers (3 literature reviews, 4 systematic reviews and 5 bibliometric studies) outlining the contributions of each. Initially, the text draws a panorama of review studies by identifying their main characteristics. It subsequently presents the 12 review papers, pointing out the main approximations, dissonances, potential trends and gaps, signalling new directions for studies and research on review studies. It was observed, therefore, the works can weave disparate methodological procedures, but still contribute to the elaboration of important syntheses for the researches in the educational field.
id SCI-1_db45e3a1b0d26bc2da78b0bd2f04b613
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/2897
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSISTRES TIPOS DE ESTUDIOS DE REVISIÓN EM INVESTIGACIÓN EDUCATIVA: CARACTERIZACIÓN Y ANÁLISISTRÊS TIPOS DE ESTUDOS DE REVISÃO NAS PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS: CARACTERIZAÇÃO E ANÁLISErevisão de literaturarevisão sistemáticaestudos bibliométricospesquisa em educaçãoliterature reviewsystematic reviewbibliometric studieseducational researchrevisión de la literaturarevisión sistemáticaestúdios bibliométricoseducaciónThis paper aims to analyse how three types of review studies (literature review, systematic review, and bibliometric studies) are approached in researches on educational knowledge production. Here, review studies are understood as those dedicated to mapping the production of knowledge, seeking to problematize trends and challenges, but also seeking to signal new demands from a given academic area and the methodological research lines. The methodology involved selecting 12 papers (3 literature reviews, 4 systematic reviews and 5 bibliometric studies) outlining the contributions of each. Initially, the text draws a panorama of review studies by identifying their main characteristics. It subsequently presents the 12 review papers, pointing out the main approximations, dissonances, potential trends and gaps, signalling new directions for studies and research on review studies. It was observed, therefore, the works can weave disparate methodological procedures, but still contribute to the elaboration of important syntheses for the researches in the educational field.Este texto tiene como objetivo analizar como se abordan três tipos de estúdios de revisión (revisión de la literatura, revisión sistemática y estudios bibliométricos) en la investigación sobre la producción de conocimiento em educación. Los estúdios de revisión se entienden aqui como aquellos que están dedicados a mapear la producción de conocimiento, buscando problematizar tendencias y desafios, pero también buscan señalar nuevas demandas desde un área académica particular y los diseños metológicos de la investigación. La metodologia implico en la selección de 12 artículos (3 revisiones bibliográficas. 4 revisiones sistemáticas y 5 estudios bibliométricos) en los que se recogen las aportaciones de cada uno de ellos. En inicio, el texto describe uma descripción general de los estúdios de revisión, identificando sus principales características. A continuación, presenta los 12 artículos de revisión, señalando las principales aproximaciones y brechas, señalando nuevos caminhos para estúdios y investigaciones sobre estúdios de revisión. Se encontró, que los trabajos pueden tejer diferens procedimentos metodológicos, pero continuan contibuyendo al desarrollo de síntese importante para la investigacioón en el ampo de educacion.O presente texto tem por objetivo analisar como três tipologias de estudos de revisão (revisão de literatura, revisão sistemática e estudos bibliométricos) são abordados em pesquisas sobre a produção do conhecimento em educação. Estudos de revisão são entendidos como aqueles que se dedicam a mapear a produção do conhecimento buscando problematizar tendências e desafios, mas também procuram sinalizar novas demandas de determinada área acadêmica e os desenhos metodológicos das pesquisas. A metodologia envolveu a seleção de 12 trabalhos (3 revisões de literatura, 4 revisões sistemáticas e 5 estudos bibliométricos) delineando as contribuições de cada um deles. Inicialmente o texto traça um panorama sobre os estudos de revisão identificando suas principais características. Na sequência apresenta os 12 trabalhos de revisão, apontando as principais aproximações, dissonâncias, potenciais tendências e lacunas, sinalizando novos caminhos para estudos e pesquisas sobre os estudos de revisão. Constatou-se, desse modo, que os trabalhos podem tecer procedimentos metodológicos díspares, mas seguem contribuindo na elaboração de sínteses importantes para as pesquisas no campo educacional.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2021-09-09info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/289710.1590/SciELOPreprints.2897porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/2897/5117Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Xavier Silva, Elizabete Pereira Barbosa, Valdelaine da Rosa Mendes, Ana Lúcia Felix dos Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Fernando XavierBarbosa, Elizabete PereiraMendes, Valdelaine da RosaSantos, Ana Lúcia Felix dosreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2021-09-03T01:53:28Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/2897Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2021-09-03T01:53:28SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
TRES TIPOS DE ESTUDIOS DE REVISIÓN EM INVESTIGACIÓN EDUCATIVA: CARACTERIZACIÓN Y ANÁLISIS
TRÊS TIPOS DE ESTUDOS DE REVISÃO NAS PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS: CARACTERIZAÇÃO E ANÁLISE
title THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
spellingShingle THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
Silva, Fernando Xavier
revisão de literatura
revisão sistemática
estudos bibliométricos
pesquisa em educação
literature review
systematic review
bibliometric studies
educational research
revisión de la literatura
revisión sistemática
estúdios bibliométricos
educación
title_short THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
title_full THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
title_fullStr THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
title_sort THREE REVIEW STUDIES TYPES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
author Silva, Fernando Xavier
author_facet Silva, Fernando Xavier
Barbosa, Elizabete Pereira
Mendes, Valdelaine da Rosa
Santos, Ana Lúcia Felix dos
author_role author
author2 Barbosa, Elizabete Pereira
Mendes, Valdelaine da Rosa
Santos, Ana Lúcia Felix dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Fernando Xavier
Barbosa, Elizabete Pereira
Mendes, Valdelaine da Rosa
Santos, Ana Lúcia Felix dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv revisão de literatura
revisão sistemática
estudos bibliométricos
pesquisa em educação
literature review
systematic review
bibliometric studies
educational research
revisión de la literatura
revisión sistemática
estúdios bibliométricos
educación
topic revisão de literatura
revisão sistemática
estudos bibliométricos
pesquisa em educação
literature review
systematic review
bibliometric studies
educational research
revisión de la literatura
revisión sistemática
estúdios bibliométricos
educación
description This paper aims to analyse how three types of review studies (literature review, systematic review, and bibliometric studies) are approached in researches on educational knowledge production. Here, review studies are understood as those dedicated to mapping the production of knowledge, seeking to problematize trends and challenges, but also seeking to signal new demands from a given academic area and the methodological research lines. The methodology involved selecting 12 papers (3 literature reviews, 4 systematic reviews and 5 bibliometric studies) outlining the contributions of each. Initially, the text draws a panorama of review studies by identifying their main characteristics. It subsequently presents the 12 review papers, pointing out the main approximations, dissonances, potential trends and gaps, signalling new directions for studies and research on review studies. It was observed, therefore, the works can weave disparate methodological procedures, but still contribute to the elaboration of important syntheses for the researches in the educational field.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2897
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2897
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2897
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2897
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/2897/5117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047824824664064

Registros relacionados