The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4244 |
Resumo: | We draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should. |
id |
SCI-1_e9cce2082db937d7ec578553e37bafae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4244 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic A Regulação da Necropolítica: Respostas Governamentais à COVID-19 no Brasil e na Índia no primeiro ano da pandemiaCovid-19BrasilÍndiaSaúde PúblicaNecropolíticaCOVID-19BrazilIndiaPublic HealthNecropoliticsIndiaWe draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should.Nossa abordagem se baseia na noção de necropolítica do filósofo camaronês Achille Mbembe para examinar as respostas governamentais ao primeiro ano da pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil e na Índia, duas nações de renda média que geralmente não são comparadas. O artigo descreve o papel desempenhado pelo presidente Jair Bolsonaro e pelo primeiro-ministro Narendra Modi no agravamento da pandemia. Bolsonaro desprezou os conselhos médicos e enquadrou a COVID-19 como a “gripezinha”. Modi, por outro lado, adotou formalmente o distanciamento social e um bloqueio nacional. Apesar das diferenças entre as abordagens brasileiras e indianas em relação à pandemia, em ambos os países as pessoas discriminadas permaneceram invisíveis. Este artigo argumenta que as respostas divergentes da Índia e do Brasil à emergência da COVID-19 foram uma questão de grau e não de natureza na regulação de uma política necropolítica que considerava alguns cidadãos como dispensáveis: negros e indígenas da Amazônia, no caso do Brasil; e, a considerável minoria muçulmana, castas marginalizadas e trabalhadores migrantes, no caso da Índia. Enquanto as mortes devido à COVID-19 atraíram visibilidade na mídia internacional, as mortes de pessoas desprivilegiadas no Brasil e na Índia não receberam atenção suficiente e foram misturadas a um tropo comum conforme o qual países em desenvolvimento são incapazes de cuidarem de si mesmos.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/424410.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4244/8051Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Lopes, Marcos Cueto, Vivek Neelakantanhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCueto, MarcosNeelakantan, Vivek Lopes, Gabrielreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-06-08T15:06:18Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4244Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-06-08T15:06:18SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic A Regulação da Necropolítica: Respostas Governamentais à COVID-19 no Brasil e na Índia no primeiro ano da pandemia |
title |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic |
spellingShingle |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic Cueto, Marcos Covid-19 Brasil Índia Saúde Pública Necropolítica COVID-19 Brazil India Public Health Necropolitics India |
title_short |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic |
title_full |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic |
title_fullStr |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic |
title_sort |
The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic |
author |
Cueto, Marcos |
author_facet |
Cueto, Marcos Neelakantan, Vivek Lopes, Gabriel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neelakantan, Vivek Lopes, Gabriel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cueto, Marcos Neelakantan, Vivek Lopes, Gabriel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Covid-19 Brasil Índia Saúde Pública Necropolítica COVID-19 Brazil India Public Health Necropolitics India |
topic |
Covid-19 Brasil Índia Saúde Pública Necropolítica COVID-19 Brazil India Public Health Necropolitics India |
description |
We draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4244 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4244 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4244/8051 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Lopes, Marcos Cueto, Vivek Neelakantan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Lopes, Marcos Cueto, Vivek Neelakantan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047828649869312 |