The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cueto, Marcos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Neelakantan, Vivek, Lopes, Gabriel
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4244
Resumo: We draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should.
id SCI-1_e9cce2082db937d7ec578553e37bafae
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4244
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic A Regulação da Necropolítica: Respostas Governamentais à COVID-19 no Brasil e na Índia no primeiro ano da pandemiaCovid-19BrasilÍndiaSaúde PúblicaNecropolíticaCOVID-19BrazilIndiaPublic HealthNecropoliticsIndiaWe draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should.Nossa abordagem se baseia na noção de necropolítica do filósofo camaronês Achille Mbembe para examinar as respostas governamentais ao primeiro ano da pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil e na Índia, duas nações de renda média que geralmente não são comparadas. O artigo descreve o papel desempenhado pelo presidente Jair Bolsonaro e pelo primeiro-ministro Narendra Modi no agravamento da pandemia. Bolsonaro desprezou os conselhos médicos e enquadrou a COVID-19 como a “gripezinha”. Modi, por outro lado, adotou formalmente o distanciamento social e um bloqueio nacional. Apesar das diferenças entre as abordagens brasileiras e indianas em relação à pandemia, em ambos os países as pessoas discriminadas permaneceram invisíveis. Este artigo argumenta que as respostas divergentes da Índia e do Brasil à emergência da COVID-19 foram uma questão de grau e não de natureza na regulação de uma política necropolítica que considerava alguns cidadãos como dispensáveis: negros e indígenas da Amazônia, no caso do Brasil; e, a considerável minoria muçulmana, castas marginalizadas e trabalhadores migrantes, no caso da Índia. Enquanto as mortes devido à COVID-19 atraíram visibilidade na mídia internacional, as mortes de pessoas desprivilegiadas no Brasil e na Índia não receberam atenção suficiente e foram misturadas a um tropo comum conforme o qual países em desenvolvimento são incapazes de cuidarem de si mesmos.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/424410.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4244/8051Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Lopes, Marcos Cueto, Vivek Neelakantanhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCueto, MarcosNeelakantan, Vivek Lopes, Gabrielreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-06-08T15:06:18Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4244Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-06-08T15:06:18SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
A Regulação da Necropolítica: Respostas Governamentais à COVID-19 no Brasil e na Índia no primeiro ano da pandemia
title The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
spellingShingle The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
Cueto, Marcos
Covid-19
Brasil
Índia
Saúde Pública
Necropolítica
COVID-19
Brazil
India
Public Health
Necropolitics
India
title_short The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
title_full The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
title_fullStr The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
title_full_unstemmed The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
title_sort The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic
author Cueto, Marcos
author_facet Cueto, Marcos
Neelakantan, Vivek
Lopes, Gabriel
author_role author
author2 Neelakantan, Vivek
Lopes, Gabriel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cueto, Marcos
Neelakantan, Vivek
Lopes, Gabriel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Covid-19
Brasil
Índia
Saúde Pública
Necropolítica
COVID-19
Brazil
India
Public Health
Necropolitics
India
topic Covid-19
Brasil
Índia
Saúde Pública
Necropolítica
COVID-19
Brazil
India
Public Health
Necropolitics
India
description We draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4244
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4244
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4244/8051
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Lopes, Marcos Cueto, Vivek Neelakantan
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Lopes, Marcos Cueto, Vivek Neelakantan
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047828649869312