Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Roncalli, Angelo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lacerda, Juciano
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1141
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the controversy caused by the divergence between the data published by the media consortium (G1, O Globo, Extra, Estadão, Folha and UOL) and by the Rio Grande do Norte State Health Secretariat in relation to the cases and deaths of covid-19. The case study is based on the approach of journalism as an event and form of knowledge, in its action on the public agenda as a central actor in a mediatized society. The results demonstrate that the way the consortium has analyzed the covid-19 data is wrong, which has important implications on the way the pandemic is being faced in Brazil.
id SCI-1_f07887d0a916b2260282f36e459a9938
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1141
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RNJornalismo e conhecimento: a divergência dos dados da covid-19 divulgados via imprensa nacional e SESAP-RNJornalismoAgenda públicaEstudo de casoPandemiaCovid-19JournalismPublic agendaCase studyPandemicCovid-19PeriodismoAgenda públicaEstudio de casoPandemiaCovid-19This article aims to analyze the controversy caused by the divergence between the data published by the media consortium (G1, O Globo, Extra, Estadão, Folha and UOL) and by the Rio Grande do Norte State Health Secretariat in relation to the cases and deaths of covid-19. The case study is based on the approach of journalism as an event and form of knowledge, in its action on the public agenda as a central actor in a mediatized society. The results demonstrate that the way the consortium has analyzed the covid-19 data is wrong, which has important implications on the way the pandemic is being faced in Brazil.Este artículo pretende analizar la polémica provocada por la divergencia entre los datos publicados por el consorcio mediático (G1, O Globo, Extra, Estadão, Folha y UOL) y por la Secretaría de Salud del Rio Grande del Norte sobre los casos y muertes de la Covid-19. El estudio de caso se basa en el enfoque del periodismo como acontecimiento y forma de conocimiento, en su acción en la agenda pública como actor central en la sociedad mediatizada. Los resultados buscan demostrar que la forma en que el consorcio trata los datos es equivocada, con importantes implicaciones para la forma en que se enfrenta la pandemia en Brasil.Este artigo pretende analisar a controvérsia provocada pela divergência entre os dados publicados pelo consórcio de veículos de comunicação (G1, O Globo, Extra, Estadão, Folha e UOL) e pela Secretaria do Estado da Saúde do Rio Grande do Norte em relação aos casos e óbitos da covid-19. O estudo de caso se fundamenta na abordagem do jornalismo como acontecimento e forma de conhecimento, em sua ação na agenda pública como ator central na sociedade midiatizada. Os resultados buscam demonstrar que a maneira como o consórcio trata os dados está equivocada, com implicações importantes para o modo como a pandemia está sendo enfrentada no Brasil.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-09-08info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/114110.1590/SciELOPreprints.1141porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1141/1798Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Roncalli, Juciano de Souza Lacerdahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRoncalli, AngeloLacerda, Jucianoreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-08-24T19:01:23Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1141Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-08-24T19:01:23SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
Jornalismo e conhecimento: a divergência dos dados da covid-19 divulgados via imprensa nacional e SESAP-RN
title Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
spellingShingle Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
Roncalli, Angelo
Jornalismo
Agenda pública
Estudo de caso
Pandemia
Covid-19
Journalism
Public agenda
Case study
Pandemic
Covid-19
Periodismo
Agenda pública
Estudio de caso
Pandemia
Covid-19
title_short Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
title_full Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
title_fullStr Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
title_full_unstemmed Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
title_sort Journalism and knowledge: the divergence of the covid-19 data published through the national press and SESAP-RN
author Roncalli, Angelo
author_facet Roncalli, Angelo
Lacerda, Juciano
author_role author
author2 Lacerda, Juciano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Roncalli, Angelo
Lacerda, Juciano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Jornalismo
Agenda pública
Estudo de caso
Pandemia
Covid-19
Journalism
Public agenda
Case study
Pandemic
Covid-19
Periodismo
Agenda pública
Estudio de caso
Pandemia
Covid-19
topic Jornalismo
Agenda pública
Estudo de caso
Pandemia
Covid-19
Journalism
Public agenda
Case study
Pandemic
Covid-19
Periodismo
Agenda pública
Estudio de caso
Pandemia
Covid-19
description This article aims to analyze the controversy caused by the divergence between the data published by the media consortium (G1, O Globo, Extra, Estadão, Folha and UOL) and by the Rio Grande do Norte State Health Secretariat in relation to the cases and deaths of covid-19. The case study is based on the approach of journalism as an event and form of knowledge, in its action on the public agenda as a central actor in a mediatized society. The results demonstrate that the way the consortium has analyzed the covid-19 data is wrong, which has important implications on the way the pandemic is being faced in Brazil.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1141
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1141
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1141
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1141
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1141/1798
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Roncalli, Juciano de Souza Lacerda
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Roncalli, Juciano de Souza Lacerda
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047820019040256