Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382009000300007 |
Resumo: | This paper presents an application of two methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), ELECTRE IV and TODIM, in order to tackle the problem of ranking projects with important economic and social consequences in the Rio de Janeiro State. These projects are ranked under the presence of quantitative and qualitative criteria. ELECTRE IV is a method of the French School of MCDA whose use does not rely on knowledge of criteria weights. TODIM, on the other hand, is a method that is based on the paradigm of Prospect Theory and that has elements of both the French and the American School of MCDA. Although ranks obtained by both methods were different, the same project was ranked as the best alternative according in both. The practical experience described in this paper has suggested that the use of MCDA methods in the ranking of project can significantly clarify the decision making process. |
id |
SOBRAPO-1_44711d1b549509534c4273d3bb56a3b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-74382009000300007 |
network_acronym_str |
SOBRAPO-1 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJdecision theorymulti-criteria decision analysispriorities of projectsThis paper presents an application of two methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), ELECTRE IV and TODIM, in order to tackle the problem of ranking projects with important economic and social consequences in the Rio de Janeiro State. These projects are ranked under the presence of quantitative and qualitative criteria. ELECTRE IV is a method of the French School of MCDA whose use does not rely on knowledge of criteria weights. TODIM, on the other hand, is a method that is based on the paradigm of Prospect Theory and that has elements of both the French and the American School of MCDA. Although ranks obtained by both methods were different, the same project was ranked as the best alternative according in both. The practical experience described in this paper has suggested that the use of MCDA methods in the ranking of project can significantly clarify the decision making process.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382009000300007Pesquisa Operacional v.29 n.3 2009reponame:Pesquisa operacional (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO)instacron:SOBRAPO10.1590/S0101-74382009000300007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRangel,Luís Alberto DuncanGomes,Luiz Flávio Autran MonteiroMoreira,Rogério Amadeleng2010-02-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-74382009000300007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/popehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sobrapo@sobrapo.org.br1678-51420101-7438opendoar:2010-02-03T00:00Pesquisa operacional (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
title |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
spellingShingle |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ Rangel,Luís Alberto Duncan decision theory multi-criteria decision analysis priorities of projects |
title_short |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
title_full |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
title_fullStr |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
title_sort |
Decision theory with multiple criteria: an aplication of ELECTRE IV and TODIM to SEBRAE/RJ |
author |
Rangel,Luís Alberto Duncan |
author_facet |
Rangel,Luís Alberto Duncan Gomes,Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Moreira,Rogério Amadel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes,Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Moreira,Rogério Amadel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rangel,Luís Alberto Duncan Gomes,Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Moreira,Rogério Amadel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
decision theory multi-criteria decision analysis priorities of projects |
topic |
decision theory multi-criteria decision analysis priorities of projects |
description |
This paper presents an application of two methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), ELECTRE IV and TODIM, in order to tackle the problem of ranking projects with important economic and social consequences in the Rio de Janeiro State. These projects are ranked under the presence of quantitative and qualitative criteria. ELECTRE IV is a method of the French School of MCDA whose use does not rely on knowledge of criteria weights. TODIM, on the other hand, is a method that is based on the paradigm of Prospect Theory and that has elements of both the French and the American School of MCDA. Although ranks obtained by both methods were different, the same project was ranked as the best alternative according in both. The practical experience described in this paper has suggested that the use of MCDA methods in the ranking of project can significantly clarify the decision making process. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382009000300007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-74382009000300007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0101-74382009000300007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Operacional v.29 n.3 2009 reponame:Pesquisa operacional (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO) instacron:SOBRAPO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO) |
instacron_str |
SOBRAPO |
institution |
SOBRAPO |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa operacional (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional (SOBRAPO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sobrapo@sobrapo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318016998932480 |