A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do STJ |
Texto Completo: | http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340 |
id |
STJ-1_17fb296b0ef9b72a0abb6ae22e5bfb3f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:2011/82340 |
network_acronym_str |
STJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do STJ |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira2014-11-26T16:07:57Z2014-11-26T16:07:57Z2010Revista de Processo: RePro, v. 35, n. 187, p. 113-140, set. 2010.http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340Submitted by Gabriela Evangelista Botelho null (gbotelho@stj.jus.br) on 2014-11-26T16:07:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf: 618684 bytes, checksum: 8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2014-11-26T16:07:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf: 618684 bytes, checksum: 8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010Revista dos TribunaisA comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespareponame:Repositório Institucional do STJinstname:Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)instacron:STJinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINALcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdfcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdfapplication/pdf618684http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/1/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1409http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/2/license.txtda41523ec20a020208f91520fc16729bMD52TEXTcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txtcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txttext/plain70947http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/3/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txtd859df41d9bf33fc23ab8a08fec136daMD532011/823402023-10-23 09:59:30.142oai:localhost:2011/82340Repositório Institucionalhttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/PUBhttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/oai/requestbdjur@stj.jus.bropendoar:2023-10-23T12:59:30Repositório Institucional do STJ - Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
title |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira |
title_short |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
title_full |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
title_sort |
A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil |
author |
Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira |
author_facet |
Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2010 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-26T16:07:57Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-26T16:07:57Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Processo: RePro, v. 35, n. 187, p. 113-140, set. 2010. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista de Processo: RePro, v. 35, n. 187, p. 113-140, set. 2010. |
url |
http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista dos Tribunais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista dos Tribunais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do STJ instname:Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) instacron:STJ |
instname_str |
Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) |
instacron_str |
STJ |
institution |
STJ |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do STJ |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do STJ |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/1/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/2/license.txt http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/3/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6 da41523ec20a020208f91520fc16729b d859df41d9bf33fc23ab8a08fec136da |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do STJ - Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdjur@stj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1800394752999292928 |