A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do STJ
Texto Completo: http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340
id STJ-1_17fb296b0ef9b72a0abb6ae22e5bfb3f
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:2011/82340
network_acronym_str STJ-1
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do STJ
repository_id_str
spelling Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira2014-11-26T16:07:57Z2014-11-26T16:07:57Z2010Revista de Processo: RePro, v. 35, n. 187, p. 113-140, set. 2010.http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340Submitted by Gabriela Evangelista Botelho null (gbotelho@stj.jus.br) on 2014-11-26T16:07:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf: 618684 bytes, checksum: 8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2014-11-26T16:07:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf: 618684 bytes, checksum: 8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010Revista dos TribunaisA comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespareponame:Repositório Institucional do STJinstname:Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)instacron:STJinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINALcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdfcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdfapplication/pdf618684http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/1/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1409http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/2/license.txtda41523ec20a020208f91520fc16729bMD52TEXTcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txtcomparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txttext/plain70947http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/3/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txtd859df41d9bf33fc23ab8a08fec136daMD532011/823402023-10-23 09:59:30.142oai:localhost:2011/82340Repositório Institucionalhttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/PUBhttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/oai/requestbdjur@stj.jus.bropendoar:2023-10-23T12:59:30Repositório Institucional do STJ - Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
title A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
spellingShingle A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira
title_short A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
title_full A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
title_fullStr A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
title_sort A comparison between the writ of certiorari in the United States and the extraordinary appeal’s general repercussion requisite in Brazil
author Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira
author_facet Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Valentina Mello Ferreira
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-11-26T16:07:57Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-11-26T16:07:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Revista de Processo: RePro, v. 35, n. 187, p. 113-140, set. 2010.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340
identifier_str_mv Revista de Processo: RePro, v. 35, n. 187, p. 113-140, set. 2010.
url http://bdjur.stj.jus.br/dspace/handle/2011/82340
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista dos Tribunais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista dos Tribunais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do STJ
instname:Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)
instacron:STJ
instname_str Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)
instacron_str STJ
institution STJ
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do STJ
collection Repositório Institucional do STJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/1/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf
http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/2/license.txt
http://10.15.0.85:8080/jspui/bitstream/2011/82340/3/comparison_between_writ_pinto.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8feae8dc51c13aff7a1712e18527a9c6
da41523ec20a020208f91520fc16729b
d859df41d9bf33fc23ab8a08fec136da
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do STJ - Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdjur@stj.jus.br
_version_ 1800394752999292928