Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
Texto Completo: http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895
Resumo: The current Brazilian housings deficit is about 7,2 million of housings which is equivalent to 12,8% of the total of domiciles of the country, in accordance with the last National Research of Sampling of Domiciles (PNAD) carried through by the IBGE in 2008. Although Brazilian housing deficit should be considered an important problem to deal with, data from last PNAD indicates advances, mainly in the direction of the absolute reduction of the deficit. If one considers a comparison in relative bases, a good indicator of the reduction of this deficit can be obtained analyzing data from 2001 and 2007 years, where it was verified a fall trend from 15,7% for 12,8% of the total of domiciles in the country. To keep this fall trajectory means a difficult challenge that must be overcome and building industry plays an important role in this process. Its action provides short term impacts, with the generation of several jobs, and long term impacts, contributing to improve quality of life of the people. In this context, the discussion about building processes that can be used to obtain gradual reduction of the housings deficit associated with economical and environmental sustainable strategies has become an important and attractive subject to scientific studies in the country. The present work performed a comparative study of three technological alternatives for building social interest houses (low cost house), namely: Building system using structural masonry walls with concrete or ceramic units, Building system with gypsum walls and Building System with expanded polystyrene panel walls. An usual geometry, of the building with 42,3 m2 in area was chose because it represents the typology often used in government programs to reduce housings deficit in Brazil. Using this archetype buildings cost were identified and analyzed for each one of the building systems studied. The features of each system were examined, standing out its potentialities, advantages and disadvantages and a detailed budget (quantities and prices) was elaborated. Obtained results showed that from the point of view of building costs alone the Building system made with structural ceramic units presented lowest costs.
id UCAP_9abcb491b5b8b6b3cc2cc8d3978b2c0f
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/895
network_acronym_str UCAP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
repository_id_str 4646
spelling Silva, Fernando Artur Nogueira361.934.024-20http://lattes.cnpq.br/7084105376262463Oliveira, Romilde Almeida de003.638.204-34http://lattes.cnpq.br/9272579827887449Oliveira, Joaquim Teodoro Romão de589.599.634-53http://lattes.cnpq.br/5198199237699879Bertini, Alexandre Araújohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3683971598856004351.546.324-00http://lattes.cnpq.br/4753940316709798Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de2017-10-16T17:59:58Z2009-12-01SOUZA, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de. Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares. 2009. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Pró-reitoria Acadêmica. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2009.http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895The current Brazilian housings deficit is about 7,2 million of housings which is equivalent to 12,8% of the total of domiciles of the country, in accordance with the last National Research of Sampling of Domiciles (PNAD) carried through by the IBGE in 2008. Although Brazilian housing deficit should be considered an important problem to deal with, data from last PNAD indicates advances, mainly in the direction of the absolute reduction of the deficit. If one considers a comparison in relative bases, a good indicator of the reduction of this deficit can be obtained analyzing data from 2001 and 2007 years, where it was verified a fall trend from 15,7% for 12,8% of the total of domiciles in the country. To keep this fall trajectory means a difficult challenge that must be overcome and building industry plays an important role in this process. Its action provides short term impacts, with the generation of several jobs, and long term impacts, contributing to improve quality of life of the people. In this context, the discussion about building processes that can be used to obtain gradual reduction of the housings deficit associated with economical and environmental sustainable strategies has become an important and attractive subject to scientific studies in the country. The present work performed a comparative study of three technological alternatives for building social interest houses (low cost house), namely: Building system using structural masonry walls with concrete or ceramic units, Building system with gypsum walls and Building System with expanded polystyrene panel walls. An usual geometry, of the building with 42,3 m2 in area was chose because it represents the typology often used in government programs to reduce housings deficit in Brazil. Using this archetype buildings cost were identified and analyzed for each one of the building systems studied. The features of each system were examined, standing out its potentialities, advantages and disadvantages and a detailed budget (quantities and prices) was elaborated. Obtained results showed that from the point of view of building costs alone the Building system made with structural ceramic units presented lowest costs.O déficit habitacional brasileiro atual é estimado em cerca 7,2 milhões de moradias que corresponde a 12,8% do total de domicílios do país, de acordo com dados da última Pesquisa Nacional de Amostragem de Domicílios (PNAD) realizada pelo IBGE em 2007. Não obstante a situação do déficit habitacional apresentada seja preocupante, os dados da última PNAD mostram avanços, principalmente na linha da redução absoluta do déficit. Considerando uma comparação em termos relativos, um bom indicativo da redução deste déficit se obtém quando são cotejados os anos de 2001 e 2007 onde foi constatado que o déficit recuou de 15,7% para 12,8% do total de domicílios no país. A manutenção desta trajetória de queda é um desafio que precisa ser vencido e a construção civil tem um papel importante a desempenhar neste processo. Este papel tem impactos no curto prazo, com a geração de empregos, e no longo prazo, contribuindo para a melhoria da qualidade de vida da população. Nesta particular, a discussão sobre processos construtivos que possibilitem a redução gradual do déficit habitacional com estratégias tecnológicas sustentáveis tanto do ponto de vista econômico quanto ambiental tem ganhado importante espaço na discussão técnico-científica no país. O presente trabalho promoveu o estudo comparativo de três alternativas tecnológicas para a construção de habitações de interesse social, a saber: Sistema Construtivo em Alvenaria Estrutural (Blocos cerâmicos e de concreto), Sistema Construtivo com Paredes de Gesso e Sistema Construtivo com Painéis Monolíticos de Poliestireno Expandido (EPS). Foi eleita uma geometria típica de edificação com 42,3 m2 que é usualmente utilizada em programas governamentais de redução do déficit habitacional, sobre a qual foram identificados os custos de construção específicos de cada sistema estudado. Foram examinadas as características de cada um dos sistemas, ressaltando suas potencialidades, vantagens e desvantagens e foram também apropriados os custos de construção com levantamento detalhado dos insumos necessários à execução dos mesmos. Os resultados obtidos apontam que, do ponto de vista do custo de implantação, o Sistema Construtivo em Alvenaria de Blocos Cerâmicos apresentou os melhores resultados.Submitted by Biblioteca Central (biblioteca@unicap.br) on 2017-10-16T17:59:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdf: 8756342 bytes, checksum: ae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170af (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-16T17:59:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdf: 8756342 bytes, checksum: ae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170af (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-12-01application/pdfporUniversidade Católica de PernambucoMestrado em Engenharia Civil##-7802886533828766338##500UNICAPBrasilDepartamento de Pós-Graduação##-8854052368273140835##500construction - estimateshousing - costsdissertationsconstrução civil - estimativashabitação popular - custosdissertaçõesENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL##-6274833215046395772##600Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações popularesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAPinstname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)instacron:UNICAPORIGINALdissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdfdissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdfapplication/pdf8756342http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/2/dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdfae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170afMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82170http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/1/license.txt5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8MD51tede/8952018-09-24 15:29:30.96oai:tede2.unicap.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.unicap.br:8080/http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/oai/requestbiblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.bropendoar:46462018-09-24T18:29:30Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
title Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
spellingShingle Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de
construction - estimates
housing - costs
dissertations
construção civil - estimativas
habitação popular - custos
dissertações
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL#
#-6274833215046395772#
#600
title_short Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
title_full Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
title_fullStr Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
title_full_unstemmed Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
title_sort Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
author Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de
author_facet Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Silva, Fernando Artur Nogueira
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 361.934.024-20
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7084105376262463
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Romilde Almeida de
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv 003.638.204-34
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9272579827887449
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Joaquim Teodoro Romão de
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv 589.599.634-53
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5198199237699879
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Bertini, Alexandre Araújo
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3683971598856004
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 351.546.324-00
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4753940316709798
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de
contributor_str_mv Silva, Fernando Artur Nogueira
Oliveira, Romilde Almeida de
Oliveira, Joaquim Teodoro Romão de
Bertini, Alexandre Araújo
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv construction - estimates
housing - costs
dissertations
topic construction - estimates
housing - costs
dissertations
construção civil - estimativas
habitação popular - custos
dissertações
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL#
#-6274833215046395772#
#600
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv construção civil - estimativas
habitação popular - custos
dissertações
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL#
#-6274833215046395772#
#600
description The current Brazilian housings deficit is about 7,2 million of housings which is equivalent to 12,8% of the total of domiciles of the country, in accordance with the last National Research of Sampling of Domiciles (PNAD) carried through by the IBGE in 2008. Although Brazilian housing deficit should be considered an important problem to deal with, data from last PNAD indicates advances, mainly in the direction of the absolute reduction of the deficit. If one considers a comparison in relative bases, a good indicator of the reduction of this deficit can be obtained analyzing data from 2001 and 2007 years, where it was verified a fall trend from 15,7% for 12,8% of the total of domiciles in the country. To keep this fall trajectory means a difficult challenge that must be overcome and building industry plays an important role in this process. Its action provides short term impacts, with the generation of several jobs, and long term impacts, contributing to improve quality of life of the people. In this context, the discussion about building processes that can be used to obtain gradual reduction of the housings deficit associated with economical and environmental sustainable strategies has become an important and attractive subject to scientific studies in the country. The present work performed a comparative study of three technological alternatives for building social interest houses (low cost house), namely: Building system using structural masonry walls with concrete or ceramic units, Building system with gypsum walls and Building System with expanded polystyrene panel walls. An usual geometry, of the building with 42,3 m2 in area was chose because it represents the typology often used in government programs to reduce housings deficit in Brazil. Using this archetype buildings cost were identified and analyzed for each one of the building systems studied. The features of each system were examined, standing out its potentialities, advantages and disadvantages and a detailed budget (quantities and prices) was elaborated. Obtained results showed that from the point of view of building costs alone the Building system made with structural ceramic units presented lowest costs.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2009-12-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-10-16T17:59:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SOUZA, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de. Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares. 2009. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Pró-reitoria Acadêmica. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2009.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895
identifier_str_mv SOUZA, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de. Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares. 2009. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Pró-reitoria Acadêmica. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2009.
url http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Engenharia Civil#
#-7802886533828766338#
#500
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNICAP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Pós-Graduação#
#-8854052368273140835#
#500
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
instname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
instacron:UNICAP
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
instacron_str UNICAP
institution UNICAP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/2/dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdf
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170af
5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.br
_version_ 1803085497070780416