Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895 |
Resumo: | The current Brazilian housings deficit is about 7,2 million of housings which is equivalent to 12,8% of the total of domiciles of the country, in accordance with the last National Research of Sampling of Domiciles (PNAD) carried through by the IBGE in 2008. Although Brazilian housing deficit should be considered an important problem to deal with, data from last PNAD indicates advances, mainly in the direction of the absolute reduction of the deficit. If one considers a comparison in relative bases, a good indicator of the reduction of this deficit can be obtained analyzing data from 2001 and 2007 years, where it was verified a fall trend from 15,7% for 12,8% of the total of domiciles in the country. To keep this fall trajectory means a difficult challenge that must be overcome and building industry plays an important role in this process. Its action provides short term impacts, with the generation of several jobs, and long term impacts, contributing to improve quality of life of the people. In this context, the discussion about building processes that can be used to obtain gradual reduction of the housings deficit associated with economical and environmental sustainable strategies has become an important and attractive subject to scientific studies in the country. The present work performed a comparative study of three technological alternatives for building social interest houses (low cost house), namely: Building system using structural masonry walls with concrete or ceramic units, Building system with gypsum walls and Building System with expanded polystyrene panel walls. An usual geometry, of the building with 42,3 m2 in area was chose because it represents the typology often used in government programs to reduce housings deficit in Brazil. Using this archetype buildings cost were identified and analyzed for each one of the building systems studied. The features of each system were examined, standing out its potentialities, advantages and disadvantages and a detailed budget (quantities and prices) was elaborated. Obtained results showed that from the point of view of building costs alone the Building system made with structural ceramic units presented lowest costs. |
id |
UCAP_9abcb491b5b8b6b3cc2cc8d3978b2c0f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/895 |
network_acronym_str |
UCAP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
repository_id_str |
4646 |
spelling |
Silva, Fernando Artur Nogueira361.934.024-20http://lattes.cnpq.br/7084105376262463Oliveira, Romilde Almeida de003.638.204-34http://lattes.cnpq.br/9272579827887449Oliveira, Joaquim Teodoro Romão de589.599.634-53http://lattes.cnpq.br/5198199237699879Bertini, Alexandre Araújohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3683971598856004351.546.324-00http://lattes.cnpq.br/4753940316709798Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de2017-10-16T17:59:58Z2009-12-01SOUZA, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de. Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares. 2009. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Pró-reitoria Acadêmica. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2009.http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895The current Brazilian housings deficit is about 7,2 million of housings which is equivalent to 12,8% of the total of domiciles of the country, in accordance with the last National Research of Sampling of Domiciles (PNAD) carried through by the IBGE in 2008. Although Brazilian housing deficit should be considered an important problem to deal with, data from last PNAD indicates advances, mainly in the direction of the absolute reduction of the deficit. If one considers a comparison in relative bases, a good indicator of the reduction of this deficit can be obtained analyzing data from 2001 and 2007 years, where it was verified a fall trend from 15,7% for 12,8% of the total of domiciles in the country. To keep this fall trajectory means a difficult challenge that must be overcome and building industry plays an important role in this process. Its action provides short term impacts, with the generation of several jobs, and long term impacts, contributing to improve quality of life of the people. In this context, the discussion about building processes that can be used to obtain gradual reduction of the housings deficit associated with economical and environmental sustainable strategies has become an important and attractive subject to scientific studies in the country. The present work performed a comparative study of three technological alternatives for building social interest houses (low cost house), namely: Building system using structural masonry walls with concrete or ceramic units, Building system with gypsum walls and Building System with expanded polystyrene panel walls. An usual geometry, of the building with 42,3 m2 in area was chose because it represents the typology often used in government programs to reduce housings deficit in Brazil. Using this archetype buildings cost were identified and analyzed for each one of the building systems studied. The features of each system were examined, standing out its potentialities, advantages and disadvantages and a detailed budget (quantities and prices) was elaborated. Obtained results showed that from the point of view of building costs alone the Building system made with structural ceramic units presented lowest costs.O déficit habitacional brasileiro atual é estimado em cerca 7,2 milhões de moradias que corresponde a 12,8% do total de domicílios do país, de acordo com dados da última Pesquisa Nacional de Amostragem de Domicílios (PNAD) realizada pelo IBGE em 2007. Não obstante a situação do déficit habitacional apresentada seja preocupante, os dados da última PNAD mostram avanços, principalmente na linha da redução absoluta do déficit. Considerando uma comparação em termos relativos, um bom indicativo da redução deste déficit se obtém quando são cotejados os anos de 2001 e 2007 onde foi constatado que o déficit recuou de 15,7% para 12,8% do total de domicílios no país. A manutenção desta trajetória de queda é um desafio que precisa ser vencido e a construção civil tem um papel importante a desempenhar neste processo. Este papel tem impactos no curto prazo, com a geração de empregos, e no longo prazo, contribuindo para a melhoria da qualidade de vida da população. Nesta particular, a discussão sobre processos construtivos que possibilitem a redução gradual do déficit habitacional com estratégias tecnológicas sustentáveis tanto do ponto de vista econômico quanto ambiental tem ganhado importante espaço na discussão técnico-científica no país. O presente trabalho promoveu o estudo comparativo de três alternativas tecnológicas para a construção de habitações de interesse social, a saber: Sistema Construtivo em Alvenaria Estrutural (Blocos cerâmicos e de concreto), Sistema Construtivo com Paredes de Gesso e Sistema Construtivo com Painéis Monolíticos de Poliestireno Expandido (EPS). Foi eleita uma geometria típica de edificação com 42,3 m2 que é usualmente utilizada em programas governamentais de redução do déficit habitacional, sobre a qual foram identificados os custos de construção específicos de cada sistema estudado. Foram examinadas as características de cada um dos sistemas, ressaltando suas potencialidades, vantagens e desvantagens e foram também apropriados os custos de construção com levantamento detalhado dos insumos necessários à execução dos mesmos. Os resultados obtidos apontam que, do ponto de vista do custo de implantação, o Sistema Construtivo em Alvenaria de Blocos Cerâmicos apresentou os melhores resultados.Submitted by Biblioteca Central (biblioteca@unicap.br) on 2017-10-16T17:59:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdf: 8756342 bytes, checksum: ae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170af (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-16T17:59:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdf: 8756342 bytes, checksum: ae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170af (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-12-01application/pdfporUniversidade Católica de PernambucoMestrado em Engenharia Civil##-7802886533828766338##500UNICAPBrasilDepartamento de Pós-Graduação##-8854052368273140835##500construction - estimateshousing - costsdissertationsconstrução civil - estimativashabitação popular - custosdissertaçõesENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL##-6274833215046395772##600Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações popularesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAPinstname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)instacron:UNICAPORIGINALdissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdfdissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdfapplication/pdf8756342http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/2/dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdfae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170afMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82170http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/1/license.txt5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8MD51tede/8952018-09-24 15:29:30.96oai:tede2.unicap.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.unicap.br:8080/http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/oai/requestbiblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.bropendoar:46462018-09-24T18:29:30Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
title |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
spellingShingle |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de construction - estimates housing - costs dissertations construção civil - estimativas habitação popular - custos dissertações ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL# #-6274833215046395772# #600 |
title_short |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
title_full |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
title_fullStr |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
title_full_unstemmed |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
title_sort |
Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares |
author |
Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de |
author_facet |
Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Fernando Artur Nogueira |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
361.934.024-20 |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7084105376262463 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Romilde Almeida de |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv |
003.638.204-34 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9272579827887449 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Joaquim Teodoro Romão de |
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv |
589.599.634-53 |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5198199237699879 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Bertini, Alexandre Araújo |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3683971598856004 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
351.546.324-00 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4753940316709798 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de |
contributor_str_mv |
Silva, Fernando Artur Nogueira Oliveira, Romilde Almeida de Oliveira, Joaquim Teodoro Romão de Bertini, Alexandre Araújo |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
construction - estimates housing - costs dissertations |
topic |
construction - estimates housing - costs dissertations construção civil - estimativas habitação popular - custos dissertações ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL# #-6274833215046395772# #600 |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
construção civil - estimativas habitação popular - custos dissertações |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL# #-6274833215046395772# #600 |
description |
The current Brazilian housings deficit is about 7,2 million of housings which is equivalent to 12,8% of the total of domiciles of the country, in accordance with the last National Research of Sampling of Domiciles (PNAD) carried through by the IBGE in 2008. Although Brazilian housing deficit should be considered an important problem to deal with, data from last PNAD indicates advances, mainly in the direction of the absolute reduction of the deficit. If one considers a comparison in relative bases, a good indicator of the reduction of this deficit can be obtained analyzing data from 2001 and 2007 years, where it was verified a fall trend from 15,7% for 12,8% of the total of domiciles in the country. To keep this fall trajectory means a difficult challenge that must be overcome and building industry plays an important role in this process. Its action provides short term impacts, with the generation of several jobs, and long term impacts, contributing to improve quality of life of the people. In this context, the discussion about building processes that can be used to obtain gradual reduction of the housings deficit associated with economical and environmental sustainable strategies has become an important and attractive subject to scientific studies in the country. The present work performed a comparative study of three technological alternatives for building social interest houses (low cost house), namely: Building system using structural masonry walls with concrete or ceramic units, Building system with gypsum walls and Building System with expanded polystyrene panel walls. An usual geometry, of the building with 42,3 m2 in area was chose because it represents the typology often used in government programs to reduce housings deficit in Brazil. Using this archetype buildings cost were identified and analyzed for each one of the building systems studied. The features of each system were examined, standing out its potentialities, advantages and disadvantages and a detailed budget (quantities and prices) was elaborated. Obtained results showed that from the point of view of building costs alone the Building system made with structural ceramic units presented lowest costs. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-16T17:59:58Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
SOUZA, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de. Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares. 2009. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Pró-reitoria Acadêmica. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2009. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895 |
identifier_str_mv |
SOUZA, Angela Cristina Alves Guimarães de. Análise comparativa de custos de alternativas tecnológicas para construção de habitações populares. 2009. 180 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Pró-reitoria Acadêmica. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2009. |
url |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/895 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado em Engenharia Civil# #-7802886533828766338# #500 |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNICAP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Pós-Graduação# #-8854052368273140835# #500 |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP instname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) instacron:UNICAP |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAP |
institution |
UNICAP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/2/dissertacao_angela_cristina_alves_guimaraes_souza.pdf http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/895/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ae03a7dd2cc8df28c80c13abd75170af 5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.br |
_version_ |
1811737518059552768 |