Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Economic Analysis of law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11256 |
Resumo: | The main objective of this research is to analyze the principle that prohibits the imposition of taxes with the effects of confiscation, according to the 1988 Federal Constitution - Article 150(IV). Although law makers possess the aptitude to create taxes, one must take into consideration the legal limits, those being laid down in the Constitutional Text related to the exercise of this taxing power. The principle of “non-confiscation” tax is one of these limits – which, being deeply related with other constitutional principles, among which highlight the equality and ability to pay – prevents the imposition of taxes that, being too onerous, come to discourage, harm or, in extreme circumstances, prevent the exercise of the citizen’s fundamental rights, especially those related to freedom and property rights. The implementation of the principle that prohibits the institution of taxes with the effects of confiscation depends on the analysis of each concrete case, by the judiciary, respecting the fundamental rights of the taxpayer. |
id |
UCB-6_40ee0c069f1cc4efe834909918cc74c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/11256 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB-6 |
network_name_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax LawTax Law Principle Confiscation Effect LimitsThe main objective of this research is to analyze the principle that prohibits the imposition of taxes with the effects of confiscation, according to the 1988 Federal Constitution - Article 150(IV). Although law makers possess the aptitude to create taxes, one must take into consideration the legal limits, those being laid down in the Constitutional Text related to the exercise of this taxing power. The principle of “non-confiscation” tax is one of these limits – which, being deeply related with other constitutional principles, among which highlight the equality and ability to pay – prevents the imposition of taxes that, being too onerous, come to discourage, harm or, in extreme circumstances, prevent the exercise of the citizen’s fundamental rights, especially those related to freedom and property rights. The implementation of the principle that prohibits the institution of taxes with the effects of confiscation depends on the analysis of each concrete case, by the judiciary, respecting the fundamental rights of the taxpayer.Universidade Católica de Brasília2019-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1125610.31501/ealr.v10i3.11256Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 221-235Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2019): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 221-235Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 10 n. 3 (2019): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 221-2352178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBenghttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11256/6797Copyright (c) 2020 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarrazza, Roque AntonioBarreni, Smith Robert2021-05-19T15:01:27Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/11256Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2021-05-19T15:01:27Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
title |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
spellingShingle |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law Carrazza, Roque Antonio Tax Law Principle Confiscation Effect Limits |
title_short |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
title_full |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
title_fullStr |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
title_sort |
Prohibition To The Confiscation Effects On Brazilian Tax Law |
author |
Carrazza, Roque Antonio |
author_facet |
Carrazza, Roque Antonio Barreni, Smith Robert |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barreni, Smith Robert |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carrazza, Roque Antonio Barreni, Smith Robert |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tax Law Principle Confiscation Effect Limits |
topic |
Tax Law Principle Confiscation Effect Limits |
description |
The main objective of this research is to analyze the principle that prohibits the imposition of taxes with the effects of confiscation, according to the 1988 Federal Constitution - Article 150(IV). Although law makers possess the aptitude to create taxes, one must take into consideration the legal limits, those being laid down in the Constitutional Text related to the exercise of this taxing power. The principle of “non-confiscation” tax is one of these limits – which, being deeply related with other constitutional principles, among which highlight the equality and ability to pay – prevents the imposition of taxes that, being too onerous, come to discourage, harm or, in extreme circumstances, prevent the exercise of the citizen’s fundamental rights, especially those related to freedom and property rights. The implementation of the principle that prohibits the institution of taxes with the effects of confiscation depends on the analysis of each concrete case, by the judiciary, respecting the fundamental rights of the taxpayer. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11256 10.31501/ealr.v10i3.11256 |
url |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11256 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31501/ealr.v10i3.11256 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11256/6797 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Economic Analysis of Law Review info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Economic Analysis of Law Review |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 221-235 Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2019): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 221-235 Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 10 n. 3 (2019): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 221-235 2178-0587 reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
collection |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798675423248252928 |