EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leister, Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Novaes Chiappin, José Raymundo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Economic Analysis of law Review
Texto Completo: https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199
Resumo: Abstract:The goal is to represent the problem of the conditions of the emergence and stability of cooperation among interacting individuals, as we interpret the clas-sical contractualist approach of the problem of the origins of civil and political rights, in terms of the model of commons tragedy. This is pursued in order toshow that the formation of the civil and political rights follows a process with two stages: privatization and statization or subjectivity and objectivity. The privatization process is related to the emergence of the individual as individual throughout the emergence of the property rights as dimensions of his individuality. In this case, each individual is himself a scarce resource still it is a common property from the point of view of the others individuals. The process of sta-tization is related to the emergence and stability of the cooperation among theindividuals. The social cooperation is the next stage and it is a strategy that results necessarily from each rational individual in order to make objective the recognition by the others of his property rights that was subjectively constructed in the process of individualization or privatization. The social cooperation, byits turn, requires the design of a contract among the individuals looking for recognition in which each of the property rights is specified and also its amount. Besides, it must specify the design of a mechanism, the State, to which is attributed the task of being in charge of the enforcement of the contract. Thecharacteristics of the design as of the contract as of the mechanism of the state depend upon certain axiological elements of the classical contractualist conception. Hobbes chooses as the main axiological element the property right to life and states the main problem is that of the preservation of the life. Therefore, the goal is to make the property right of life objective or, in other words, that must be a mutual recognition of this property right. In order to reach this goal it will be acceptable a trade-off between others property rights such as freedom, equality and also the right to defend each one with all means, among them the life of the others. This article, however, deals with the development of these ideas from Locke to Kant. Locke approaches the solution of this problem by incorporating new property rights as his main axiological elements. This means that these rights are not to be submitted to trade-off as they were in Hobbes except for the property right to life. The new property rights are the rights of liberty and rights of property together with the property right to life. The design of the contract and of the mechanism has to do with the enforcementof these rights. It follows the pattern developed by Hobbes as the basic condi-tions to solve the problem of the emergence and stability of cooperation: the state. However, the self-government of the individuals in the state of nature is not completely abolished, because the mechanism of coordination incorporateselements which aim to keeping the control of the government in the hands of the individuals. With this strategy he amplifies the idea of the individual as an end by creating many more rights that are not submitted to trade-off. Rousseau will add other property rights to those of Locke and Hobbes and will universalize them. Besides, he will bring the mechanism of the government totally in the hands of the individuals. We could say that Rousseau´s solution to the problem of the emergence and stability of cooperation is the institution of the self-government with his idea of autonomy. Kant pushes this idea of auton-omy to its limit by completing the formation of the civil and political rights and makes the idea of the individual as a end and never as means the unifying idea of his conception. He gives a final picture for the classical contractualist conception with the construction of the realm of the ends.
id UCB-6_d51e74594aec76cd845d43dd2fca1765
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/4199
network_acronym_str UCB-6
network_name_str Economic Analysis of law Review
repository_id_str
spelling EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLSTragédia dos Comuns Cooperação Experimento Mental Contratualismo Teoria Geral do EstadoAbstract:The goal is to represent the problem of the conditions of the emergence and stability of cooperation among interacting individuals, as we interpret the clas-sical contractualist approach of the problem of the origins of civil and political rights, in terms of the model of commons tragedy. This is pursued in order toshow that the formation of the civil and political rights follows a process with two stages: privatization and statization or subjectivity and objectivity. The privatization process is related to the emergence of the individual as individual throughout the emergence of the property rights as dimensions of his individuality. In this case, each individual is himself a scarce resource still it is a common property from the point of view of the others individuals. The process of sta-tization is related to the emergence and stability of the cooperation among theindividuals. The social cooperation is the next stage and it is a strategy that results necessarily from each rational individual in order to make objective the recognition by the others of his property rights that was subjectively constructed in the process of individualization or privatization. The social cooperation, byits turn, requires the design of a contract among the individuals looking for recognition in which each of the property rights is specified and also its amount. Besides, it must specify the design of a mechanism, the State, to which is attributed the task of being in charge of the enforcement of the contract. Thecharacteristics of the design as of the contract as of the mechanism of the state depend upon certain axiological elements of the classical contractualist conception. Hobbes chooses as the main axiological element the property right to life and states the main problem is that of the preservation of the life. Therefore, the goal is to make the property right of life objective or, in other words, that must be a mutual recognition of this property right. In order to reach this goal it will be acceptable a trade-off between others property rights such as freedom, equality and also the right to defend each one with all means, among them the life of the others. This article, however, deals with the development of these ideas from Locke to Kant. Locke approaches the solution of this problem by incorporating new property rights as his main axiological elements. This means that these rights are not to be submitted to trade-off as they were in Hobbes except for the property right to life. The new property rights are the rights of liberty and rights of property together with the property right to life. The design of the contract and of the mechanism has to do with the enforcementof these rights. It follows the pattern developed by Hobbes as the basic condi-tions to solve the problem of the emergence and stability of cooperation: the state. However, the self-government of the individuals in the state of nature is not completely abolished, because the mechanism of coordination incorporateselements which aim to keeping the control of the government in the hands of the individuals. With this strategy he amplifies the idea of the individual as an end by creating many more rights that are not submitted to trade-off. Rousseau will add other property rights to those of Locke and Hobbes and will universalize them. Besides, he will bring the mechanism of the government totally in the hands of the individuals. We could say that Rousseau´s solution to the problem of the emergence and stability of cooperation is the institution of the self-government with his idea of autonomy. Kant pushes this idea of auton-omy to its limit by completing the formation of the civil and political rights and makes the idea of the individual as a end and never as means the unifying idea of his conception. He gives a final picture for the classical contractualist conception with the construction of the realm of the ends.Universidade Católica de Brasília2016-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer ReviewedExperimento Mentalapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/419910.31501/ealr.v7i2.4199Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2016): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 714-736Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2016): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 714-736Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 7 n. 2 (2016): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 714-7362178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBporhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199/4793https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199/9627Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeister, CarolinaNovaes Chiappin, José Raymundo2017-04-27T11:16:11Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/4199Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2017-04-27T11:16:11Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
title EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
spellingShingle EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
Leister, Carolina
Tragédia dos Comuns
Cooperação
Experimento Mental
Contratualismo
Teoria Geral do Estado
title_short EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
title_full EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
title_fullStr EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
title_full_unstemmed EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
title_sort EXPERIMENTO MENTAL II: A CONCEPÇÃO CONTRATUALISTA CLÁSSICA, O MODELO DA TRAGÉDIA DOS COMUNS E AS CONDIÇÕES DE EMERGÊNCIA DA COOPERAÇÃO - LOCKE, ROUSSEAU, KANT E RAWLS
author Leister, Carolina
author_facet Leister, Carolina
Novaes Chiappin, José Raymundo
author_role author
author2 Novaes Chiappin, José Raymundo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leister, Carolina
Novaes Chiappin, José Raymundo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tragédia dos Comuns
Cooperação
Experimento Mental
Contratualismo
Teoria Geral do Estado
topic Tragédia dos Comuns
Cooperação
Experimento Mental
Contratualismo
Teoria Geral do Estado
description Abstract:The goal is to represent the problem of the conditions of the emergence and stability of cooperation among interacting individuals, as we interpret the clas-sical contractualist approach of the problem of the origins of civil and political rights, in terms of the model of commons tragedy. This is pursued in order toshow that the formation of the civil and political rights follows a process with two stages: privatization and statization or subjectivity and objectivity. The privatization process is related to the emergence of the individual as individual throughout the emergence of the property rights as dimensions of his individuality. In this case, each individual is himself a scarce resource still it is a common property from the point of view of the others individuals. The process of sta-tization is related to the emergence and stability of the cooperation among theindividuals. The social cooperation is the next stage and it is a strategy that results necessarily from each rational individual in order to make objective the recognition by the others of his property rights that was subjectively constructed in the process of individualization or privatization. The social cooperation, byits turn, requires the design of a contract among the individuals looking for recognition in which each of the property rights is specified and also its amount. Besides, it must specify the design of a mechanism, the State, to which is attributed the task of being in charge of the enforcement of the contract. Thecharacteristics of the design as of the contract as of the mechanism of the state depend upon certain axiological elements of the classical contractualist conception. Hobbes chooses as the main axiological element the property right to life and states the main problem is that of the preservation of the life. Therefore, the goal is to make the property right of life objective or, in other words, that must be a mutual recognition of this property right. In order to reach this goal it will be acceptable a trade-off between others property rights such as freedom, equality and also the right to defend each one with all means, among them the life of the others. This article, however, deals with the development of these ideas from Locke to Kant. Locke approaches the solution of this problem by incorporating new property rights as his main axiological elements. This means that these rights are not to be submitted to trade-off as they were in Hobbes except for the property right to life. The new property rights are the rights of liberty and rights of property together with the property right to life. The design of the contract and of the mechanism has to do with the enforcementof these rights. It follows the pattern developed by Hobbes as the basic condi-tions to solve the problem of the emergence and stability of cooperation: the state. However, the self-government of the individuals in the state of nature is not completely abolished, because the mechanism of coordination incorporateselements which aim to keeping the control of the government in the hands of the individuals. With this strategy he amplifies the idea of the individual as an end by creating many more rights that are not submitted to trade-off. Rousseau will add other property rights to those of Locke and Hobbes and will universalize them. Besides, he will bring the mechanism of the government totally in the hands of the individuals. We could say that Rousseau´s solution to the problem of the emergence and stability of cooperation is the institution of the self-government with his idea of autonomy. Kant pushes this idea of auton-omy to its limit by completing the formation of the civil and political rights and makes the idea of the individual as a end and never as means the unifying idea of his conception. He gives a final picture for the classical contractualist conception with the construction of the realm of the ends.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed
Experimento Mental
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199
10.31501/ealr.v7i2.4199
url https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199
identifier_str_mv 10.31501/ealr.v7i2.4199
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199/4793
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/4199/9627
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2016): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 714-736
Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2016): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 714-736
Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 7 n. 2 (2016): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 714-736
2178-0587
reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Economic Analysis of law Review
collection Economic Analysis of law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com
_version_ 1798675422432460800