Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nardi, Ricardo Perin
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
Texto Completo: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221
Resumo: This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.
id UCB_9fdccbec2db1ba090a878fcbe658bfad
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2221
network_acronym_str UCB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
spelling Aguiar, J??lio C??sar dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7152243130773982http://lattes.cnpq.br/7155400058255472Nardi, Ricardo Perin2017-08-14T14:24:44Z2016-11-26NARDI, Ricardo Perin. Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente. 2016. 104 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2016.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.O presente estudo defende a ideia de que a prova por ind??cios possibilita obten????o da verdade no processo penal. Para tanto, defendemos, em primeiro lugar, que a verdade obtida no processo penal n??o se difere da verdade obtida nos demais ramos da ci??ncia, conquanto haja determinadas limita????es impostas por outros valores de semelhante peso ?? verdade, como ?? o caso da veda????o ?? obten????o de provas por meios il??citos. Estabelecida essa premissa, e adotando a teoria da verdade com correspond??ncia, defendemos que a an??lise do argumento probat??rio deve seguir o m??todo da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente, que consiste, basicamente, em um m??todo l??gico de an??lise do racioc??nio probat??rio em que a hip??tese deve explicar de forma mais coerente as evid??ncias dispon??veis, as quais sustentam a hip??tese.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-14T14:24:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf: 1076205 bytes, checksum: ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-14T14:24:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf: 1076205 bytes, checksum: ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-14T14:24:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf: 1076205 bytes, checksum: ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-26application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/4925/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Strictu Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidade e DireitoProcesso penalProva por ind??ciosArgumento probat??rioCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOProva por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerenteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82122https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/1/license.txt302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3MD51ORIGINALRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdfRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdfapplication/pdf1076205https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/2/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdfed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bfMD52TEXTRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txtRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txttext/plain274583https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/3/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txt799cb1709a127dfd48655068c46a2a96MD53THUMBNAILRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5155https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/4/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg5f6c6614b53d88b2f3712632560bd4c5MD54tede/22212019-09-19 09:24:19.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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
title Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
spellingShingle Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
Nardi, Ricardo Perin
Processo penal
Prova por ind??cios
Argumento probat??rio
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
title_full Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
title_fullStr Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
title_full_unstemmed Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
title_sort Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
author Nardi, Ricardo Perin
author_facet Nardi, Ricardo Perin
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Aguiar, J??lio C??sar de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7152243130773982
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7155400058255472
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nardi, Ricardo Perin
contributor_str_mv Aguiar, J??lio C??sar de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Processo penal
Prova por ind??cios
Argumento probat??rio
topic Processo penal
Prova por ind??cios
Argumento probat??rio
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv O presente estudo defende a ideia de que a prova por ind??cios possibilita obten????o da verdade no processo penal. Para tanto, defendemos, em primeiro lugar, que a verdade obtida no processo penal n??o se difere da verdade obtida nos demais ramos da ci??ncia, conquanto haja determinadas limita????es impostas por outros valores de semelhante peso ?? verdade, como ?? o caso da veda????o ?? obten????o de provas por meios il??citos. Estabelecida essa premissa, e adotando a teoria da verdade com correspond??ncia, defendemos que a an??lise do argumento probat??rio deve seguir o m??todo da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente, que consiste, basicamente, em um m??todo l??gico de an??lise do racioc??nio probat??rio em que a hip??tese deve explicar de forma mais coerente as evid??ncias dispon??veis, as quais sustentam a hip??tese.
description This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016-11-26
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-08-14T14:24:44Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv NARDI, Ricardo Perin. Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente. 2016. 104 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2016.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221
identifier_str_mv NARDI, Ricardo Perin. Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente. 2016. 104 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2016.
url https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UCB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Humanidade e Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/1/license.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/2/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/3/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/4/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3
ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf
799cb1709a127dfd48655068c46a2a96
5f6c6614b53d88b2f3712632560bd4c5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829775299608576

Registros relacionados