Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
Texto Completo: | https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221 |
Resumo: | This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis. |
id |
UCB_9fdccbec2db1ba090a878fcbe658bfad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2221 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
spelling |
Aguiar, J??lio C??sar dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7152243130773982http://lattes.cnpq.br/7155400058255472Nardi, Ricardo Perin2017-08-14T14:24:44Z2016-11-26NARDI, Ricardo Perin. Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente. 2016. 104 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2016.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.O presente estudo defende a ideia de que a prova por ind??cios possibilita obten????o da verdade no processo penal. Para tanto, defendemos, em primeiro lugar, que a verdade obtida no processo penal n??o se difere da verdade obtida nos demais ramos da ci??ncia, conquanto haja determinadas limita????es impostas por outros valores de semelhante peso ?? verdade, como ?? o caso da veda????o ?? obten????o de provas por meios il??citos. Estabelecida essa premissa, e adotando a teoria da verdade com correspond??ncia, defendemos que a an??lise do argumento probat??rio deve seguir o m??todo da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente, que consiste, basicamente, em um m??todo l??gico de an??lise do racioc??nio probat??rio em que a hip??tese deve explicar de forma mais coerente as evid??ncias dispon??veis, as quais sustentam a hip??tese.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-14T14:24:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf: 1076205 bytes, checksum: ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-14T14:24:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf: 1076205 bytes, checksum: ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-14T14:24:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf: 1076205 bytes, checksum: ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-26application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/4925/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Strictu Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidade e DireitoProcesso penalProva por ind??ciosArgumento probat??rioCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOProva por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerenteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82122https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/1/license.txt302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3MD51ORIGINALRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdfRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdfapplication/pdf1076205https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/2/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdfed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bfMD52TEXTRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txtRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txttext/plain274583https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/3/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txt799cb1709a127dfd48655068c46a2a96MD53THUMBNAILRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgRicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5155https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/4/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg5f6c6614b53d88b2f3712632560bd4c5MD54tede/22212019-09-19 09:24:19.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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/ |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
title |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
spellingShingle |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente Nardi, Ricardo Perin Processo penal Prova por ind??cios Argumento probat??rio CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
title_full |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
title_fullStr |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
title_sort |
Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente |
author |
Nardi, Ricardo Perin |
author_facet |
Nardi, Ricardo Perin |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Aguiar, J??lio C??sar de |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7152243130773982 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7155400058255472 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nardi, Ricardo Perin |
contributor_str_mv |
Aguiar, J??lio C??sar de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Processo penal Prova por ind??cios Argumento probat??rio |
topic |
Processo penal Prova por ind??cios Argumento probat??rio CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv |
This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis. |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
O presente estudo defende a ideia de que a prova por ind??cios possibilita obten????o da verdade no processo penal. Para tanto, defendemos, em primeiro lugar, que a verdade obtida no processo penal n??o se difere da verdade obtida nos demais ramos da ci??ncia, conquanto haja determinadas limita????es impostas por outros valores de semelhante peso ?? verdade, como ?? o caso da veda????o ?? obten????o de provas por meios il??citos. Estabelecida essa premissa, e adotando a teoria da verdade com correspond??ncia, defendemos que a an??lise do argumento probat??rio deve seguir o m??todo da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente, que consiste, basicamente, em um m??todo l??gico de an??lise do racioc??nio probat??rio em que a hip??tese deve explicar de forma mais coerente as evid??ncias dispon??veis, as quais sustentam a hip??tese. |
description |
This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-26 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-14T14:24:44Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
NARDI, Ricardo Perin. Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente. 2016. 104 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2016. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221 |
identifier_str_mv |
NARDI, Ricardo Perin. Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente. 2016. 104 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2016. |
url |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UCB |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidade e Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/1/license.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/2/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/3/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2221/4/RicardoPerinNardiDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3 ed2cbd304304f71bd3a54a7123d7f2bf 799cb1709a127dfd48655068c46a2a96 5f6c6614b53d88b2f3712632560bd4c5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1724829775299608576 |