Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Fernando Noronha de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
Texto Completo: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2719
Resumo: Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ?? 2.3 years; 1.76 ?? 0.14 m; body mass = 79.41 ?? 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ?? 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV.
id UCB_e8fa058771de1afe21411b9012be3b06
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2719
network_acronym_str UCB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
spelling Prestes, Jonatohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0724257078898678http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/busca.doAlmeida, Fernando Noronha de2020-03-31T21:38:15Z2019-12-19ALMEIDA, Fernando Noronha de. Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular. 2019. 49 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Educa????o F??sica) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2719Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ?? 2.3 years; 1.76 ?? 0.14 m; body mass = 79.41 ?? 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ?? 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV.Introdu????o: Indiv??duos treinados t??m dificuldade em alcan??ar resultados cont??nuos ap??s anos de treinamento e a manipula????o de vari??veis no treinamento por meio dos m??todos de treinamento de for??a (TF) avan??ados ?? amplamente recomendada para romper plat??s. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar os efeitos agudos do TF tradicional (TFT) versus dois tipos de m??todos de treino; conhecidos como sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) sobre o volume total de treinamento (VTT), lactato e espessura muscular (EM). M??todos: Doze homens treinados (20,75 ?? 2,3 anos; 1,76 ?? 0,14 metros; massa corporal = 79,41 4,6 kg; Experi??ncia de TF = 4,1 ?? 1,8 anos) completaram tr??s protocolos de TF em ordem aleat??ria: TFT, SST com varia????o no tipo de contra????o (SST-CT) e SST com varia????o no intervalo de descanso (SST-RIV) com 7 dias de intervalo entre as sess??es realizadas na rosca direta (flexores de cotovelo) e tr??ceps na polia (extensores do cotovelo) realizados no mesmo dia. Resultados: Os grupos de SST apresentaram maior EM de b??ceps braquial (BB) e tr??ceps braquial (TB) versus a sess??o TFT, sem diferen??a nas concentra????es de lactato entre eles. O SST-CT resultou em maior EM de b??ceps e de TB em rela????o ?? sess??o SST-RIV. O VTT foi maior para a sess??o TFT versus as sess??es SST, exceto no caso dos flexores de cotovelo, n??o foi observada diferen??a entre TFT e SST-CT, sendo maior para o SST-CT versus o SST-RIV. Conclus??o: Sujeitos treinados podem se beneficiar do uso do m??todo SST visto que o m??todo pode oferecer um est??mulo diferente observado pelos resultados de EM e com tempo de treinamento reduzido, mesmo com um menor VTT.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2020-03-31T21:37:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf: 1489863 bytes, checksum: 3f527425a8c725c4b764884d5768b028 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2020-03-31T21:38:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf: 1489863 bytes, checksum: 3f527425a8c725c4b764884d5768b028 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-03-31T21:38:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf: 1489863 bytes, checksum: 3f527425a8c725c4b764884d5768b028 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-12-19application/pdfhttps://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/retrieve/6960/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Stricto Sensu em Educa????o F??sicaUCBBrasilEscola de Sa??de e MedicinaIncha??o muscularExerc??cio de for??aTreinamento f??sicoResistance exerciseTraining methodMuscle pumpCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICAEfeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscularinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBTHUMBNAILFernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpgFernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5124https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/4/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpg081c186c115777751aa8bb3c2da138d3MD54TEXTFernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.txtFernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.txttext/plain77975https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/3/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.txt3b34b0e6fc5b53a710f6ddc48b051759MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81905https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/1/license.txt75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7MD51ORIGINALFernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdfFernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdfapplication/pdf1489863https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/2/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf3f527425a8c725c4b764884d5768b028MD52tede/27192020-07-07 15:56:19.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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
title Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
spellingShingle Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
Almeida, Fernando Noronha de
Incha??o muscular
Exerc??cio de for??a
Treinamento f??sico
Resistance exercise
Training method
Muscle pump
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICA
title_short Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
title_full Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
title_fullStr Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
title_full_unstemmed Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
title_sort Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular
author Almeida, Fernando Noronha de
author_facet Almeida, Fernando Noronha de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Prestes, Jonato
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0724257078898678
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/busca.do
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Fernando Noronha de
contributor_str_mv Prestes, Jonato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Incha??o muscular
Exerc??cio de for??a
Treinamento f??sico
topic Incha??o muscular
Exerc??cio de for??a
Treinamento f??sico
Resistance exercise
Training method
Muscle pump
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Resistance exercise
Training method
Muscle pump
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICA
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ?? 2.3 years; 1.76 ?? 0.14 m; body mass = 79.41 ?? 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ?? 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv Introdu????o: Indiv??duos treinados t??m dificuldade em alcan??ar resultados cont??nuos ap??s anos de treinamento e a manipula????o de vari??veis no treinamento por meio dos m??todos de treinamento de for??a (TF) avan??ados ?? amplamente recomendada para romper plat??s. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar os efeitos agudos do TF tradicional (TFT) versus dois tipos de m??todos de treino; conhecidos como sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) sobre o volume total de treinamento (VTT), lactato e espessura muscular (EM). M??todos: Doze homens treinados (20,75 ?? 2,3 anos; 1,76 ?? 0,14 metros; massa corporal = 79,41 4,6 kg; Experi??ncia de TF = 4,1 ?? 1,8 anos) completaram tr??s protocolos de TF em ordem aleat??ria: TFT, SST com varia????o no tipo de contra????o (SST-CT) e SST com varia????o no intervalo de descanso (SST-RIV) com 7 dias de intervalo entre as sess??es realizadas na rosca direta (flexores de cotovelo) e tr??ceps na polia (extensores do cotovelo) realizados no mesmo dia. Resultados: Os grupos de SST apresentaram maior EM de b??ceps braquial (BB) e tr??ceps braquial (TB) versus a sess??o TFT, sem diferen??a nas concentra????es de lactato entre eles. O SST-CT resultou em maior EM de b??ceps e de TB em rela????o ?? sess??o SST-RIV. O VTT foi maior para a sess??o TFT versus as sess??es SST, exceto no caso dos flexores de cotovelo, n??o foi observada diferen??a entre TFT e SST-CT, sendo maior para o SST-CT versus o SST-RIV. Conclus??o: Sujeitos treinados podem se beneficiar do uso do m??todo SST visto que o m??todo pode oferecer um est??mulo diferente observado pelos resultados de EM e com tempo de treinamento reduzido, mesmo com um menor VTT.
description Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ?? 2.3 years; 1.76 ?? 0.14 m; body mass = 79.41 ?? 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ?? 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-12-19
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-03-31T21:38:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ALMEIDA, Fernando Noronha de. Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular. 2019. 49 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Educa????o F??sica) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2719
identifier_str_mv ALMEIDA, Fernando Noronha de. Efeitos agudos do novo m??todo sarcoplasma stimulating training versus treinamento de for??a tradicional sobre o volume total de treinamento, lactato e espessura muscular. 2019. 49 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Educa????o F??sica) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.
url https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2719
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Stricto Sensu em Educa????o F??sica
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UCB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Sa??de e Medicina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/4/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpg
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/3/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/1/license.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2719/2/FernandoNoronhadeAlmeidaDissertacao2019.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 081c186c115777751aa8bb3c2da138d3
3b34b0e6fc5b53a710f6ddc48b051759
75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7
3f527425a8c725c4b764884d5768b028
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829780919975936