OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Shalini
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sapre, Abhilash Arun
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Lex Humana
Texto Completo: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2404
Resumo: Court rendering justice system is yet the usual choice of the people with consistent vested faith on the judiciary as compared to the other dispute resolution mechanism. However, in the recent past, Arbitration has emerged as a shining line by facilitating party autonomous and fast-track resolution process. Certain undefined principles in the context of arbitration have lowered the image of the Indian Arbitration regime in the International field. One such translucent concept is Anti-Arbitration Injunction (AAI) regarding which no explicit legislative framework or judicial pronouncement exists. The conflict of court power and arbitral tribunal competency has always been a contentious point. This further exaggerates when both coincide or overlap each other’s jurisdiction. The issue of jurisdiction in the matter of AAI is highly controversial and it further gets complicated in absence of any definite international guideline or domestic legislative framework. In such a situation, the judiciary gets a level playing field to interpret or to exploit the gaps in the law. The approach of the Indian judiciary on the subject-matter remains to be vague and without any consensus in the precedents. In the first instance, the author explicates the remedy of an Anti-Arbitration Injunction and the facets attached to granting of such injunction. Walking ahead, the author discusses the mechanism of the endowment of AAI by courts focusing on dual situations of restriction and favour to arbitration. Thereafter, the author endeavours to highlight the major controversies raised out of the conflicting decisions of the Indian judiciary in dealing with the issuance of AAI. In this milieu, the author discusses varied notable judicial pronouncements covering numerous involved intricacies. On the latter segments, AAI is showcased in the light of investment regime. Lastly, the author expresses their understanding, finding and suggestion on the present subject-matter of AAI.
id UCP-1_1b4b39ac1df93cf771cbb37541824451
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2404
network_acronym_str UCP-1
network_name_str Lex Humana
repository_id_str
spelling OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLEPOSIÇÃO OSCILANTE DA ÍNDIA SOBRE A INJUNÇÃO ANTI-ARBITRAÇÃO: UM ÂNGULO CONTRÁRIOJudicial PronouncementInvestment Arbitration.Anti-Arbitration InjunctionPronunciamento Judicial. Arbitragem de Investimento.Injunção Anti-ArbitragemCourt rendering justice system is yet the usual choice of the people with consistent vested faith on the judiciary as compared to the other dispute resolution mechanism. However, in the recent past, Arbitration has emerged as a shining line by facilitating party autonomous and fast-track resolution process. Certain undefined principles in the context of arbitration have lowered the image of the Indian Arbitration regime in the International field. One such translucent concept is Anti-Arbitration Injunction (AAI) regarding which no explicit legislative framework or judicial pronouncement exists. The conflict of court power and arbitral tribunal competency has always been a contentious point. This further exaggerates when both coincide or overlap each other’s jurisdiction. The issue of jurisdiction in the matter of AAI is highly controversial and it further gets complicated in absence of any definite international guideline or domestic legislative framework. In such a situation, the judiciary gets a level playing field to interpret or to exploit the gaps in the law. The approach of the Indian judiciary on the subject-matter remains to be vague and without any consensus in the precedents. In the first instance, the author explicates the remedy of an Anti-Arbitration Injunction and the facets attached to granting of such injunction. Walking ahead, the author discusses the mechanism of the endowment of AAI by courts focusing on dual situations of restriction and favour to arbitration. Thereafter, the author endeavours to highlight the major controversies raised out of the conflicting decisions of the Indian judiciary in dealing with the issuance of AAI. In this milieu, the author discusses varied notable judicial pronouncements covering numerous involved intricacies. On the latter segments, AAI is showcased in the light of investment regime. Lastly, the author expresses their understanding, finding and suggestion on the present subject-matter of AAI.O sistema de justiça ainda é a escolha usual do povo com uma fé consistente no Judiciário, em comparação com o outro mecanismo de resolução de disputas. No entanto, no passado recente, a Arbitragem surgiu como uma linha brilhante ao facilitar o processo de resolução rápida e autônoma das partes. Certos princípios indefinidos no contexto da arbitragem baixaram a imagem do regime de Arbitragem indiano no campo internacional. Um desses conceitos translúcidos é a Injunção Anti-Arbitragem (AAI), em relação à qual não existe uma estrutura legislativa ou pronunciamento judicial explícito. O conflito de poder judicial e competência do tribunal arbitral sempre foi um ponto polêmico. Isto exagera ainda mais quando ambos coincidem ou se sobrepõem à jurisdição um do outro. A questão da jurisdição na questão da AAI é altamente controversa e se complica ainda mais na ausência de qualquer diretriz internacional definida ou estrutura legislativa doméstica. Em tal situação, o Judiciário obtém igualdade de condições para interpretar ou para explorar as lacunas da lei. A abordagem do judiciário indiano sobre o assunto continua a ser vaga e sem qualquer consenso nos precedentes. Em primeira instância, o autor explica o recurso de uma medida cautelar anti-abuso e as facetas ligadas à concessão de tal medida cautelar. Seguindo adiante, o autor discute o mecanismo de dotação da AAI pelos tribunais, concentrando-se em situações duplas de restrição e favorecimento da arbitragem. Depois disso, o autor se esforça para destacar as principais controvérsias levantadas pelas decisões conflitantes do judiciário indiano ao lidar com a emissão da AAI. Neste meio, o autor discute vários pronunciamentos judiciais notáveis cobrindo inúmeras complexidades envolvidas. Sobre estes últimos segmentos, a AAI é mostrada à luz do regime de investimentos. Finalmente, o autor expressa sua compreensão, achado e sugestão sobre o assunto atual da AAI.Universidade Católica de Petrópolis2023-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2404Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): JAN.-MAR.; 204-223Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); v. 15 n. 1 (2023): JAN.-MAR.; 204-2232175-0947reponame:Lex Humanainstname:Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)instacron:UCPenghttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2404/3405Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShaliniSapre, Abhilash Arun2023-02-27T09:50:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2404Revistahttp://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php?journal=LexHumanaPUBhttp://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/oai||sergio.salles@ucp.br2175-09472175-0947opendoar:2023-02-27T09:50:28Lex Humana - Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
POSIÇÃO OSCILANTE DA ÍNDIA SOBRE A INJUNÇÃO ANTI-ARBITRAÇÃO: UM ÂNGULO CONTRÁRIO
title OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
spellingShingle OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
Shalini
Judicial Pronouncement
Investment Arbitration.
Anti-Arbitration Injunction
Pronunciamento Judicial.
Arbitragem de Investimento.
Injunção Anti-Arbitragem
title_short OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
title_full OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
title_fullStr OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
title_full_unstemmed OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
title_sort OSCILLATING POSITION OF INDIA ON ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: A CONTRARIAN ANGLE
author Shalini
author_facet Shalini
Sapre, Abhilash Arun
author_role author
author2 Sapre, Abhilash Arun
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Shalini
Sapre, Abhilash Arun
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicial Pronouncement
Investment Arbitration.
Anti-Arbitration Injunction
Pronunciamento Judicial.
Arbitragem de Investimento.
Injunção Anti-Arbitragem
topic Judicial Pronouncement
Investment Arbitration.
Anti-Arbitration Injunction
Pronunciamento Judicial.
Arbitragem de Investimento.
Injunção Anti-Arbitragem
description Court rendering justice system is yet the usual choice of the people with consistent vested faith on the judiciary as compared to the other dispute resolution mechanism. However, in the recent past, Arbitration has emerged as a shining line by facilitating party autonomous and fast-track resolution process. Certain undefined principles in the context of arbitration have lowered the image of the Indian Arbitration regime in the International field. One such translucent concept is Anti-Arbitration Injunction (AAI) regarding which no explicit legislative framework or judicial pronouncement exists. The conflict of court power and arbitral tribunal competency has always been a contentious point. This further exaggerates when both coincide or overlap each other’s jurisdiction. The issue of jurisdiction in the matter of AAI is highly controversial and it further gets complicated in absence of any definite international guideline or domestic legislative framework. In such a situation, the judiciary gets a level playing field to interpret or to exploit the gaps in the law. The approach of the Indian judiciary on the subject-matter remains to be vague and without any consensus in the precedents. In the first instance, the author explicates the remedy of an Anti-Arbitration Injunction and the facets attached to granting of such injunction. Walking ahead, the author discusses the mechanism of the endowment of AAI by courts focusing on dual situations of restriction and favour to arbitration. Thereafter, the author endeavours to highlight the major controversies raised out of the conflicting decisions of the Indian judiciary in dealing with the issuance of AAI. In this milieu, the author discusses varied notable judicial pronouncements covering numerous involved intricacies. On the latter segments, AAI is showcased in the light of investment regime. Lastly, the author expresses their understanding, finding and suggestion on the present subject-matter of AAI.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2404
url https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2404
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2404/3405
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Petrópolis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Petrópolis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): JAN.-MAR.; 204-223
Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); v. 15 n. 1 (2023): JAN.-MAR.; 204-223
2175-0947
reponame:Lex Humana
instname:Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)
instacron:UCP
instname_str Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)
instacron_str UCP
institution UCP
reponame_str Lex Humana
collection Lex Humana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Lex Humana - Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sergio.salles@ucp.br
_version_ 1809279387286110208