Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920 |
Resumo: | Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect. |
id |
UEL-11_0a6f422eadbd147dd1b0f4d44623e226 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15920 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattleAdministração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinosPeriduralCattleLocal anesthetica2 agonistsLocal block.EpiduralRuminantesAnestésicos locaisa-2 agonistasAnestesia local.Anestesiologia AnimalEpidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.Protocolos epidurais são comumente utilizados em bovinos, possibilitando inclusive a realização de procedimentos cirúrgicos com o animal em posição quadrupedal, no entanto, problemas como paresia e decúbito, além do tempo de bloqueio/recuperação são fatores importantes na escolha do protocolo. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar dois protocolos de anestesia epidural em bovinos, quanto ao tempo, qualidade de bloqueio e efeitos clínicos. Foram utilizadas 14 vacas mestiças, com peso médio de 350±170 kg, as quais foram alocadas em dois grupos: ropivacaína (GR, n=7) onde os animais receberam a administração epidural de ropivacaína (0,1 mg.kg-1) e ropivacaína/xilazina (GRX, n=7) que receberam ropivacaína e xilazina (0,075 e 0,05 mg.kg-1, respectivamente) pela mesma via. Avaliou-se: freqüência cardíaca (FC), frequência respiratória (f), pressão arterial média (PAM), movimentos ruminais (MR), temperatura retal (TR), tempo de duração do bloqueio anestésico (TB), qualidade do bloqueio (QB) através da resposta a estímulos nociceptivos pelo clampeamento perineal, grau de paresia (GP) e hemogasometria arterial. Os animais foram avaliados por até 420 minutos após a administração. A FC, f, PAM, pH, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 - e Excesso de Base (EB) não diferiram entre grupos. Foi observada uma leve diminuição nos movimentos ruminais e aumento da PaO2 e TR no GRX comparado ao GR. A duração do bloqueio sensitivo foi de 6 e 7 horas para o GR e GRX, respectivamente. A QB foi considerada boa/excelente frente à estimulação nociceptiva em 66% e 71% dos animais do GR em M360 e do GRX em M420. Os animais do GRX apresentaram sinais de paresia moderada a grave de M15 até M240. Conclui-se que a ropivacaína associada à xilazina pela via epidural apresenta bloqueio sensitivo mais prolongado do que a ropivacaína isolada, no entanto a associação com a xilazina promove bloqueio motor, com sinais de paresia, devendo ser utilizada com cautela em bovinos. UEL2014-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1592010.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 4Supl (2014); 2481-2490Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 4Supl (2014); 2481-24901679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920/pdf_429Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Aury Nunes deRegalin, DoughlasSantos, Mauro Augusto dosCosta, Bruna Ditzel daFlores, Fabíola NiederauerOleskovicz, Nilson2023-01-16T13:58:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15920Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-16T13:58:33Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos |
title |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle |
spellingShingle |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Moraes, Aury Nunes de Peridural Cattle Local anesthetic a2 agonists Local block. Epidural Ruminantes Anestésicos locais a-2 agonistas Anestesia local. Anestesiologia Animal |
title_short |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle |
title_full |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle |
title_fullStr |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle |
title_sort |
Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle |
author |
Moraes, Aury Nunes de |
author_facet |
Moraes, Aury Nunes de Regalin, Doughlas Santos, Mauro Augusto dos Costa, Bruna Ditzel da Flores, Fabíola Niederauer Oleskovicz, Nilson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Regalin, Doughlas Santos, Mauro Augusto dos Costa, Bruna Ditzel da Flores, Fabíola Niederauer Oleskovicz, Nilson |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Aury Nunes de Regalin, Doughlas Santos, Mauro Augusto dos Costa, Bruna Ditzel da Flores, Fabíola Niederauer Oleskovicz, Nilson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peridural Cattle Local anesthetic a2 agonists Local block. Epidural Ruminantes Anestésicos locais a-2 agonistas Anestesia local. Anestesiologia Animal |
topic |
Peridural Cattle Local anesthetic a2 agonists Local block. Epidural Ruminantes Anestésicos locais a-2 agonistas Anestesia local. Anestesiologia Animal |
description |
Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920 10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920/pdf_429 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 4Supl (2014); 2481-2490 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 4Supl (2014); 2481-2490 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306070371336192 |