Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Regalin, Doughlas, Santos, Mauro Augusto dos, Costa, Bruna Ditzel da, Flores, Fabíola Niederauer, Oleskovicz, Nilson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920
Resumo: Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.
id UEL-11_0a6f422eadbd147dd1b0f4d44623e226
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15920
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattleAdministração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinosPeriduralCattleLocal anesthetica2 agonistsLocal block.EpiduralRuminantesAnestésicos locaisa-2 agonistasAnestesia local.Anestesiologia AnimalEpidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.Protocolos epidurais são comumente utilizados em bovinos, possibilitando inclusive a realização de procedimentos cirúrgicos com o animal em posição quadrupedal, no entanto, problemas como paresia e decúbito, além do tempo de bloqueio/recuperação são fatores importantes na escolha do protocolo. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar dois protocolos de anestesia epidural em bovinos, quanto ao tempo, qualidade de bloqueio e efeitos clínicos. Foram utilizadas 14 vacas mestiças, com peso médio de 350±170 kg, as quais foram alocadas em dois grupos: ropivacaína (GR, n=7) onde os animais receberam a administração epidural de ropivacaína (0,1 mg.kg-1) e ropivacaína/xilazina (GRX, n=7) que receberam ropivacaína e xilazina (0,075 e 0,05 mg.kg-1, respectivamente) pela mesma via. Avaliou-se: freqüência cardíaca (FC), frequência respiratória (f), pressão arterial média (PAM), movimentos ruminais (MR), temperatura retal (TR), tempo de duração do bloqueio anestésico (TB), qualidade do bloqueio (QB) através da resposta a estímulos nociceptivos pelo clampeamento perineal, grau de paresia (GP) e hemogasometria arterial. Os animais foram avaliados por até 420 minutos após a administração. A FC, f, PAM, pH, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 - e Excesso de Base (EB) não diferiram entre grupos. Foi observada uma leve diminuição nos movimentos ruminais e aumento da PaO2 e TR no GRX comparado ao GR. A duração do bloqueio sensitivo foi de 6 e 7 horas para o GR e GRX, respectivamente. A QB foi considerada boa/excelente frente à estimulação nociceptiva em 66% e 71% dos animais do GR em M360 e do GRX em M420. Os animais do GRX apresentaram sinais de paresia moderada a grave de M15 até M240. Conclui-se que a ropivacaína associada à xilazina pela via epidural apresenta bloqueio sensitivo mais prolongado do que a ropivacaína isolada, no entanto a associação com a xilazina promove bloqueio motor, com sinais de paresia, devendo ser utilizada com cautela em bovinos. UEL2014-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1592010.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 4Supl (2014); 2481-2490Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 4Supl (2014); 2481-24901679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920/pdf_429Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Aury Nunes deRegalin, DoughlasSantos, Mauro Augusto dosCosta, Bruna Ditzel daFlores, Fabíola NiederauerOleskovicz, Nilson2023-01-16T13:58:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15920Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-16T13:58:33Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
title Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
spellingShingle Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Peridural
Cattle
Local anesthetic
a2 agonists
Local block.
Epidural
Ruminantes
Anestésicos locais
a-2 agonistas
Anestesia local.
Anestesiologia Animal
title_short Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
title_full Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
title_fullStr Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
title_full_unstemmed Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
title_sort Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle
author Moraes, Aury Nunes de
author_facet Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Regalin, Doughlas
Santos, Mauro Augusto dos
Costa, Bruna Ditzel da
Flores, Fabíola Niederauer
Oleskovicz, Nilson
author_role author
author2 Regalin, Doughlas
Santos, Mauro Augusto dos
Costa, Bruna Ditzel da
Flores, Fabíola Niederauer
Oleskovicz, Nilson
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Aury Nunes de
Regalin, Doughlas
Santos, Mauro Augusto dos
Costa, Bruna Ditzel da
Flores, Fabíola Niederauer
Oleskovicz, Nilson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peridural
Cattle
Local anesthetic
a2 agonists
Local block.
Epidural
Ruminantes
Anestésicos locais
a-2 agonistas
Anestesia local.
Anestesiologia Animal
topic Peridural
Cattle
Local anesthetic
a2 agonists
Local block.
Epidural
Ruminantes
Anestésicos locais
a-2 agonistas
Anestesia local.
Anestesiologia Animal
description Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were located in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3 -and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2 and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920
10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Suplp2481
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15920/pdf_429
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 4Supl (2014); 2481-2490
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 4Supl (2014); 2481-2490
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306070371336192