Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118 |
Resumo: | The work aimed (Experiment I) to compare commercial representations of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) in concentration (10 ?g/mL) and time (24 h) standard (more used in protocols of in vitro maturation, IVM); (Experiment II) to evaluate the best incubation time (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) and, (Experiment III) analyze varying concentrations (1.0 ?g/mL vs. 2.5 ?g/mL vs. 10.0 ?g/mL) of representations of FSH on the IVM of bovine oocytes. Thus, oocytes were recovered and submitted to IVM under appropriate conditions. After the IVM, oocytes were evaluated for expansion of cumulus cells (CCs), presence of the first polar body (1PB) and metaphase plate (MII). All the data were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). Initially, in Experiment I, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in maturation rates of the oocytes incubated with FSH Pluset® or Folltropin®, assessed by expansion of CCs (97.6% vs. 94.3%), presence of 1PB (76.6% vs. 69.4%) and MII (70.0% vs. 68.6%). In Experiment II, when the incubation time with FSH was evaluated, both Pluset® as Folltropin® showed lower rate of expansion of CCs when they were present only in the first 6 h of IVM. As for presence of 1PB, differences were observed in relation to Pluset® while Folltropin® showed similar results in all incubation times. Regarding the MII, no difference was observed between the incubation times with FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. In Experiment III, no difference was observed in the expansion of CCs, presence of 1PB and MII for concentrations evaluated FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. Therefore, the FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® have the same efficiency in IVM of bovine oocytes. Regarding the incubation time, it is recommended to maintain FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) throughout the period of IVM, since there was no difference in the results of presence of MII. Furthermore, the concentration of 1.0 ?g/mL of FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® is as effective as 10 ?g/mL and can therefore be used for IVM of oocytes. |
id |
UEL-11_616cd64c4caff3593efb65c4a61b07e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26118 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytesInfluência do hormônio folículo-estimulante disponível comercialmente sobre a maturação in vitro de oócitos bovinosCattleGonadotropinIn vitro production of embryosOocytes.BovinoGonadotrofinaProdução in vitro de embriõesOócitos.The work aimed (Experiment I) to compare commercial representations of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) in concentration (10 ?g/mL) and time (24 h) standard (more used in protocols of in vitro maturation, IVM); (Experiment II) to evaluate the best incubation time (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) and, (Experiment III) analyze varying concentrations (1.0 ?g/mL vs. 2.5 ?g/mL vs. 10.0 ?g/mL) of representations of FSH on the IVM of bovine oocytes. Thus, oocytes were recovered and submitted to IVM under appropriate conditions. After the IVM, oocytes were evaluated for expansion of cumulus cells (CCs), presence of the first polar body (1PB) and metaphase plate (MII). All the data were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). Initially, in Experiment I, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in maturation rates of the oocytes incubated with FSH Pluset® or Folltropin®, assessed by expansion of CCs (97.6% vs. 94.3%), presence of 1PB (76.6% vs. 69.4%) and MII (70.0% vs. 68.6%). In Experiment II, when the incubation time with FSH was evaluated, both Pluset® as Folltropin® showed lower rate of expansion of CCs when they were present only in the first 6 h of IVM. As for presence of 1PB, differences were observed in relation to Pluset® while Folltropin® showed similar results in all incubation times. Regarding the MII, no difference was observed between the incubation times with FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. In Experiment III, no difference was observed in the expansion of CCs, presence of 1PB and MII for concentrations evaluated FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. Therefore, the FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® have the same efficiency in IVM of bovine oocytes. Regarding the incubation time, it is recommended to maintain FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) throughout the period of IVM, since there was no difference in the results of presence of MII. Furthermore, the concentration of 1.0 ?g/mL of FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® is as effective as 10 ?g/mL and can therefore be used for IVM of oocytes.O trabalho objetivou (Experimento I) comparar representações comerciais do hormônio folículo estimulante suíno (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) na concentração (10 ?g/mL) e tempo (24 h) padrão (mais utilizados nos protocolos de maturação in vitro, MIV); (Experimento II) avaliar o melhor tempo de incubação (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) e, (Experimento III) analisar concentrações variáveis (1,0 ?g/mL vs. 2,5 ?g/mL vs. 10,0 ?g/mL) das representações de FSH sobre a MIV de oócitos bovinos. Para tanto, oócitos foram recuperados e submetidos a MIV em condições adequadas. Após a MIV, oócitos foram avaliados quanto à expansão das células do cumulus (CCs), presença do primeiro corpúsculo polar (1CP) e placa metafásica (MII). Todos os dados foram analisados pelo teste exato de Fisher (P < 0,05). Inicialmente, no Experimento I, nenhuma diferença (P > 0,05) nas taxas de maturação de oócitos incubados com FSH Pluset® ou Folltropin®, avaliadas pela expansão das CCs (97,6% vs. 94,3%), presença de 1CP (76,6% vs. 69,4%) e MII (70,0% vs. 68,6%). No Experimento II, quanto ao tempo de incubação com FSH foi avaliado, tanto Pluset® quanto Folltropin® mostraram uma menor taxa de expansão de CCs somente nas primeiras 6 h de MIV. Quanto à presença de 1CP, diferenças foram observadas em relação ao Pluset® enquanto o Folltropin® mostrou resultados similares em todos os tempos de incubação. Em relação à MII, nenhuma diferença foi observada entre os tempos de incubação com o FSH Pluset® e Folltropin®. No Experimento III, nenhuma diferença foi observada na expansão das CCs, presença do 1CP e MII para as concentrações avaliadas de FSH Pluset® e Folltropin®. Portanto, FSH Pluset® e Folltropin® tem a mesma eficiência na MIV de oócitos bovinos. Em relação ao tempo de incubação, é recomendado manter o FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) ao longo do período da MIV, uma vez que nenhuma diferença foi observada nos resultados da presença de MII. Além disso, a concentração de 1,0 ?g/mL de FSH Pluset® e Folltropin® é tão eficiente quanto a 10 ?g/mL e pode, portanto, ser usada para a MIV de oócitos.UEL2017-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2611810.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1393Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2017); 1393-1402Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 3 (2017); 1393-14021679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118/21009Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Maria Valéria de OliveiraQueiroz Neta, Luiza Bento deBorges, Alana AzevedoPereira, Alexsandra Fernandes2022-10-24T13:37:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26118Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T13:37:08Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes Influência do hormônio folículo-estimulante disponível comercialmente sobre a maturação in vitro de oócitos bovinos |
title |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes |
spellingShingle |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira Cattle Gonadotropin In vitro production of embryos Oocytes. Bovino Gonadotrofina Produção in vitro de embriões Oócitos. |
title_short |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes |
title_full |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes |
title_fullStr |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes |
title_sort |
Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes |
author |
Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de Borges, Alana Azevedo Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de Borges, Alana Azevedo Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de Borges, Alana Azevedo Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cattle Gonadotropin In vitro production of embryos Oocytes. Bovino Gonadotrofina Produção in vitro de embriões Oócitos. |
topic |
Cattle Gonadotropin In vitro production of embryos Oocytes. Bovino Gonadotrofina Produção in vitro de embriões Oócitos. |
description |
The work aimed (Experiment I) to compare commercial representations of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) in concentration (10 ?g/mL) and time (24 h) standard (more used in protocols of in vitro maturation, IVM); (Experiment II) to evaluate the best incubation time (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) and, (Experiment III) analyze varying concentrations (1.0 ?g/mL vs. 2.5 ?g/mL vs. 10.0 ?g/mL) of representations of FSH on the IVM of bovine oocytes. Thus, oocytes were recovered and submitted to IVM under appropriate conditions. After the IVM, oocytes were evaluated for expansion of cumulus cells (CCs), presence of the first polar body (1PB) and metaphase plate (MII). All the data were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). Initially, in Experiment I, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in maturation rates of the oocytes incubated with FSH Pluset® or Folltropin®, assessed by expansion of CCs (97.6% vs. 94.3%), presence of 1PB (76.6% vs. 69.4%) and MII (70.0% vs. 68.6%). In Experiment II, when the incubation time with FSH was evaluated, both Pluset® as Folltropin® showed lower rate of expansion of CCs when they were present only in the first 6 h of IVM. As for presence of 1PB, differences were observed in relation to Pluset® while Folltropin® showed similar results in all incubation times. Regarding the MII, no difference was observed between the incubation times with FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. In Experiment III, no difference was observed in the expansion of CCs, presence of 1PB and MII for concentrations evaluated FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. Therefore, the FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® have the same efficiency in IVM of bovine oocytes. Regarding the incubation time, it is recommended to maintain FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) throughout the period of IVM, since there was no difference in the results of presence of MII. Furthermore, the concentration of 1.0 ?g/mL of FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® is as effective as 10 ?g/mL and can therefore be used for IVM of oocytes. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1393 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1393 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118/21009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2017); 1393-1402 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 3 (2017); 1393-1402 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306076315713536 |