Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de, Borges, Alana Azevedo, Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118
Resumo: The work aimed (Experiment I) to compare commercial representations of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) in concentration (10 ?g/mL) and time (24 h) standard (more used in protocols of in vitro maturation, IVM); (Experiment II) to evaluate the best incubation time (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) and, (Experiment III) analyze varying concentrations (1.0 ?g/mL vs. 2.5 ?g/mL vs. 10.0 ?g/mL) of representations of FSH on the IVM of bovine oocytes. Thus, oocytes were recovered and submitted to IVM under appropriate conditions. After the IVM, oocytes were evaluated for expansion of cumulus cells (CCs), presence of the first polar body (1PB) and metaphase plate (MII). All the data were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). Initially, in Experiment I, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in maturation rates of the oocytes incubated with FSH Pluset® or Folltropin®, assessed by expansion of CCs (97.6% vs. 94.3%), presence of 1PB (76.6% vs. 69.4%) and MII (70.0% vs. 68.6%). In Experiment II, when the incubation time with FSH was evaluated, both Pluset® as Folltropin® showed lower rate of expansion of CCs when they were present only in the first 6 h of IVM. As for presence of 1PB, differences were observed in relation to Pluset® while Folltropin® showed similar results in all incubation times. Regarding the MII, no difference was observed between the incubation times with FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. In Experiment III, no difference was observed in the expansion of CCs, presence of 1PB and MII for concentrations evaluated FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. Therefore, the FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® have the same efficiency in IVM of bovine oocytes. Regarding the incubation time, it is recommended to maintain FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) throughout the period of IVM, since there was no difference in the results of presence of MII. Furthermore, the concentration of 1.0 ?g/mL of FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® is as effective as 10 ?g/mL and can therefore be used for IVM of oocytes.
id UEL-11_616cd64c4caff3593efb65c4a61b07e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26118
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytesInfluência do hormônio folículo-estimulante disponível comercialmente sobre a maturação in vitro de oócitos bovinosCattleGonadotropinIn vitro production of embryosOocytes.BovinoGonadotrofinaProdução in vitro de embriõesOócitos.The work aimed (Experiment I) to compare commercial representations of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) in concentration (10 ?g/mL) and time (24 h) standard (more used in protocols of in vitro maturation, IVM); (Experiment II) to evaluate the best incubation time (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) and, (Experiment III) analyze varying concentrations (1.0 ?g/mL vs. 2.5 ?g/mL vs. 10.0 ?g/mL) of representations of FSH on the IVM of bovine oocytes. Thus, oocytes were recovered and submitted to IVM under appropriate conditions. After the IVM, oocytes were evaluated for expansion of cumulus cells (CCs), presence of the first polar body (1PB) and metaphase plate (MII). All the data were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). Initially, in Experiment I, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in maturation rates of the oocytes incubated with FSH Pluset® or Folltropin®, assessed by expansion of CCs (97.6% vs. 94.3%), presence of 1PB (76.6% vs. 69.4%) and MII (70.0% vs. 68.6%). In Experiment II, when the incubation time with FSH was evaluated, both Pluset® as Folltropin® showed lower rate of expansion of CCs when they were present only in the first 6 h of IVM. As for presence of 1PB, differences were observed in relation to Pluset® while Folltropin® showed similar results in all incubation times. Regarding the MII, no difference was observed between the incubation times with FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. In Experiment III, no difference was observed in the expansion of CCs, presence of 1PB and MII for concentrations evaluated FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. Therefore, the FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® have the same efficiency in IVM of bovine oocytes. Regarding the incubation time, it is recommended to maintain FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) throughout the period of IVM, since there was no difference in the results of presence of MII. Furthermore, the concentration of 1.0 ?g/mL of FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® is as effective as 10 ?g/mL and can therefore be used for IVM of oocytes.O trabalho objetivou (Experimento I) comparar representações comerciais do hormônio folículo estimulante suíno (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) na concentração (10 ?g/mL) e tempo (24 h) padrão (mais utilizados nos protocolos de maturação in vitro, MIV); (Experimento II) avaliar o melhor tempo de incubação (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) e, (Experimento III) analisar concentrações variáveis (1,0 ?g/mL vs. 2,5 ?g/mL vs. 10,0 ?g/mL) das representações de FSH sobre a MIV de oócitos bovinos. Para tanto, oócitos foram recuperados e submetidos a MIV em condições adequadas. Após a MIV, oócitos foram avaliados quanto à expansão das células do cumulus (CCs), presença do primeiro corpúsculo polar (1CP) e placa metafásica (MII). Todos os dados foram analisados pelo teste exato de Fisher (P < 0,05). Inicialmente, no Experimento I, nenhuma diferença (P > 0,05) nas taxas de maturação de oócitos incubados com FSH Pluset® ou Folltropin®, avaliadas pela expansão das CCs (97,6% vs. 94,3%), presença de 1CP (76,6% vs. 69,4%) e MII (70,0% vs. 68,6%). No Experimento II, quanto ao tempo de incubação com FSH foi avaliado, tanto Pluset® quanto Folltropin® mostraram uma menor taxa de expansão de CCs somente nas primeiras 6 h de MIV. Quanto à presença de 1CP, diferenças foram observadas em relação ao Pluset® enquanto o Folltropin® mostrou resultados similares em todos os tempos de incubação. Em relação à MII, nenhuma diferença foi observada entre os tempos de incubação com o FSH Pluset® e Folltropin®. No Experimento III, nenhuma diferença foi observada na expansão das CCs, presença do 1CP e MII para as concentrações avaliadas de FSH Pluset® e Folltropin®. Portanto, FSH Pluset® e Folltropin® tem a mesma eficiência na MIV de oócitos bovinos. Em relação ao tempo de incubação, é recomendado manter o FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) ao longo do período da MIV, uma vez que nenhuma diferença foi observada nos resultados da presença de MII. Além disso, a concentração de 1,0 ?g/mL de FSH Pluset® e Folltropin® é tão eficiente quanto a 10 ?g/mL e pode, portanto, ser usada para a MIV de oócitos.UEL2017-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2611810.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1393Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2017); 1393-1402Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 3 (2017); 1393-14021679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118/21009Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Maria Valéria de OliveiraQueiroz Neta, Luiza Bento deBorges, Alana AzevedoPereira, Alexsandra Fernandes2022-10-24T13:37:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26118Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T13:37:08Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
Influência do hormônio folículo-estimulante disponível comercialmente sobre a maturação in vitro de oócitos bovinos
title Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
spellingShingle Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira
Cattle
Gonadotropin
In vitro production of embryos
Oocytes.
Bovino
Gonadotrofina
Produção in vitro de embriões
Oócitos.
title_short Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
title_full Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
title_fullStr Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
title_full_unstemmed Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
title_sort Influence of commercially available follicle stimulating hormone on the in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
author Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira
author_facet Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira
Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de
Borges, Alana Azevedo
Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes
author_role author
author2 Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de
Borges, Alana Azevedo
Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Maria Valéria de Oliveira
Queiroz Neta, Luiza Bento de
Borges, Alana Azevedo
Pereira, Alexsandra Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cattle
Gonadotropin
In vitro production of embryos
Oocytes.
Bovino
Gonadotrofina
Produção in vitro de embriões
Oócitos.
topic Cattle
Gonadotropin
In vitro production of embryos
Oocytes.
Bovino
Gonadotrofina
Produção in vitro de embriões
Oócitos.
description The work aimed (Experiment I) to compare commercial representations of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Pluset® vs. Folltropin®) in concentration (10 ?g/mL) and time (24 h) standard (more used in protocols of in vitro maturation, IVM); (Experiment II) to evaluate the best incubation time (6 h vs. 16 h vs. 24 h) and, (Experiment III) analyze varying concentrations (1.0 ?g/mL vs. 2.5 ?g/mL vs. 10.0 ?g/mL) of representations of FSH on the IVM of bovine oocytes. Thus, oocytes were recovered and submitted to IVM under appropriate conditions. After the IVM, oocytes were evaluated for expansion of cumulus cells (CCs), presence of the first polar body (1PB) and metaphase plate (MII). All the data were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). Initially, in Experiment I, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed in maturation rates of the oocytes incubated with FSH Pluset® or Folltropin®, assessed by expansion of CCs (97.6% vs. 94.3%), presence of 1PB (76.6% vs. 69.4%) and MII (70.0% vs. 68.6%). In Experiment II, when the incubation time with FSH was evaluated, both Pluset® as Folltropin® showed lower rate of expansion of CCs when they were present only in the first 6 h of IVM. As for presence of 1PB, differences were observed in relation to Pluset® while Folltropin® showed similar results in all incubation times. Regarding the MII, no difference was observed between the incubation times with FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. In Experiment III, no difference was observed in the expansion of CCs, presence of 1PB and MII for concentrations evaluated FSH Pluset® and Folltropin®. Therefore, the FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® have the same efficiency in IVM of bovine oocytes. Regarding the incubation time, it is recommended to maintain FSH (Pluset® or Folltropin®) throughout the period of IVM, since there was no difference in the results of presence of MII. Furthermore, the concentration of 1.0 ?g/mL of FSH Pluset® and Folltropin® is as effective as 10 ?g/mL and can therefore be used for IVM of oocytes.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1393
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1393
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26118/21009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2017); 1393-1402
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 3 (2017); 1393-1402
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306076315713536