Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Caio Abércio da
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Bridi, Ana Maria, Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan, Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da, Menegucci, Christiane Gual, Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917
Resumo: The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the use of two probiotic doses compared with diets formulated with two antibiotics principles (tylosin and doxicycline+gentamicin) supplied to swines during nursery phase (ages of 21 to 63 days). Forty eight swines were submitted to the following treatments: T1 (Treatment 1) - diets with 39 ppm of tylosin phosphate; T2 (Treatment 2) - diets with 1.9 x 107 UFC/100g of ration; T3 (Treatment 3) - diets with 3.8 x 107 UFC/100g of ration and T4 (Treatment 4) - diets with 13.6 ppm of doxicycline chloridrate + 8.8 ppm of gentamicin sulfate. Were evaluated the daily weight gain, the daily feed intake, the feed conversion and the diarrhea occurrence. The experimental design was done in randomized blocks, with 4 treatments and 6 replications (each replication was represented by a pen with two swines). The performance data were submitted to a variance analysis (ANOVA) and the results were compared by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the occurrence of diarrhea (among 2 treatments) was used the qui square test. There were no differences between treatments for performance parameters. The T1 presented the highest occurrence of diarrhea compared to the other treatments. The best economic efficiency results were observed to T4, T3, T1 and T2, respectively. The use of probiotics or antibiotics principles, on the applied doses, determined positive results in the performance of swines during nursery phase.
id UEL-11_616ee89dfc25e920a8aae58051724994
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2917
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phaseUso de probiótico e de antibióticos na alimentação de leitões em fase de crecheMicrobiotaPerformanceDiarroheaSwine.MicrobiotaDesempenhoDiarréiaSuínos.The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the use of two probiotic doses compared with diets formulated with two antibiotics principles (tylosin and doxicycline+gentamicin) supplied to swines during nursery phase (ages of 21 to 63 days). Forty eight swines were submitted to the following treatments: T1 (Treatment 1) - diets with 39 ppm of tylosin phosphate; T2 (Treatment 2) - diets with 1.9 x 107 UFC/100g of ration; T3 (Treatment 3) - diets with 3.8 x 107 UFC/100g of ration and T4 (Treatment 4) - diets with 13.6 ppm of doxicycline chloridrate + 8.8 ppm of gentamicin sulfate. Were evaluated the daily weight gain, the daily feed intake, the feed conversion and the diarrhea occurrence. The experimental design was done in randomized blocks, with 4 treatments and 6 replications (each replication was represented by a pen with two swines). The performance data were submitted to a variance analysis (ANOVA) and the results were compared by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the occurrence of diarrhea (among 2 treatments) was used the qui square test. There were no differences between treatments for performance parameters. The T1 presented the highest occurrence of diarrhea compared to the other treatments. The best economic efficiency results were observed to T4, T3, T1 and T2, respectively. The use of probiotics or antibiotics principles, on the applied doses, determined positive results in the performance of swines during nursery phase.O experimento foi conduzido visando avaliar o uso de duas doses de probióticos comparadas com rações medicadas com dois princípios antimicrobianos (tilosina e doxiciclina+gentamicina) para leitões em fase de creche (21 a 63 dias de idade). Foram utilizados 48 animais submetidos aos seguintes tratamentos: T1- ração com 39 ppm de sulfato de tilosina ; T2 - ração com 1,9 x 107 UFC/100g de ração; T3 – ração com 3,8 x 107 UFC/100g de ração; e T4 – ração com 13,6 ppm de cloridrato de doxiciclina + 8,8 ppm de sulfato de gentamicina de doxigent. Foram avaliados o ganho diário de peso, o consumo diário de ração, a conversão alimentar e a ocorrência de diarréias. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados, com 4 tratamentos e 6 repetições (cada repetição foi representada por uma baia com 2 leitões). Os dados de desempenho foram submetidos à análise de variância e as médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey. Para a comparação da ocorrência de diarréia (entre dois tratamentos) foi utilizado o teste de qui-quadrado. Não foram observadas diferenças entre os tratamentos para os parâmetros de desempenho. Houve maior ocorrência de diarréia para o tratamento 1, comparado com cada um dos demais tratamentos. Os melhores resultados para índices de eficiência econômica foram, respectivamente, para T4, T3, T1 e T2. A utilização de probióticos ou dos princípios antimicrobianos, nas doses empregadas, determinam resultados positivos no desempenho de leitões na fase de creche.UEL2007-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/291710.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n4p739Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2007); 739-746Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 28 n. 4 (2007); 739-7461679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917/2474Silva, Caio Abércio daBridi, Ana MariaCastro-Gomez, Raul Jorge HernanSilva, Carla Renata Benitez daMenegucci, Christiane GualCarvalho, Bruna Bueno deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:38:55Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2917Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:38:55Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
Uso de probiótico e de antibióticos na alimentação de leitões em fase de creche
title Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
spellingShingle Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
Silva, Caio Abércio da
Microbiota
Performance
Diarrohea
Swine.
Microbiota
Desempenho
Diarréia
Suínos.
title_short Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
title_full Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
title_fullStr Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
title_full_unstemmed Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
title_sort Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
author Silva, Caio Abércio da
author_facet Silva, Caio Abércio da
Bridi, Ana Maria
Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan
Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da
Menegucci, Christiane Gual
Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de
author_role author
author2 Bridi, Ana Maria
Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan
Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da
Menegucci, Christiane Gual
Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Caio Abércio da
Bridi, Ana Maria
Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan
Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da
Menegucci, Christiane Gual
Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Microbiota
Performance
Diarrohea
Swine.
Microbiota
Desempenho
Diarréia
Suínos.
topic Microbiota
Performance
Diarrohea
Swine.
Microbiota
Desempenho
Diarréia
Suínos.
description The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the use of two probiotic doses compared with diets formulated with two antibiotics principles (tylosin and doxicycline+gentamicin) supplied to swines during nursery phase (ages of 21 to 63 days). Forty eight swines were submitted to the following treatments: T1 (Treatment 1) - diets with 39 ppm of tylosin phosphate; T2 (Treatment 2) - diets with 1.9 x 107 UFC/100g of ration; T3 (Treatment 3) - diets with 3.8 x 107 UFC/100g of ration and T4 (Treatment 4) - diets with 13.6 ppm of doxicycline chloridrate + 8.8 ppm of gentamicin sulfate. Were evaluated the daily weight gain, the daily feed intake, the feed conversion and the diarrhea occurrence. The experimental design was done in randomized blocks, with 4 treatments and 6 replications (each replication was represented by a pen with two swines). The performance data were submitted to a variance analysis (ANOVA) and the results were compared by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the occurrence of diarrhea (among 2 treatments) was used the qui square test. There were no differences between treatments for performance parameters. The T1 presented the highest occurrence of diarrhea compared to the other treatments. The best economic efficiency results were observed to T4, T3, T1 and T2, respectively. The use of probiotics or antibiotics principles, on the applied doses, determined positive results in the performance of swines during nursery phase.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917
10.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n4p739
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n4p739
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917/2474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2007); 739-746
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 28 n. 4 (2007); 739-746
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306059192467456