Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917 |
Resumo: | The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the use of two probiotic doses compared with diets formulated with two antibiotics principles (tylosin and doxicycline+gentamicin) supplied to swines during nursery phase (ages of 21 to 63 days). Forty eight swines were submitted to the following treatments: T1 (Treatment 1) - diets with 39 ppm of tylosin phosphate; T2 (Treatment 2) - diets with 1.9 x 107 UFC/100g of ration; T3 (Treatment 3) - diets with 3.8 x 107 UFC/100g of ration and T4 (Treatment 4) - diets with 13.6 ppm of doxicycline chloridrate + 8.8 ppm of gentamicin sulfate. Were evaluated the daily weight gain, the daily feed intake, the feed conversion and the diarrhea occurrence. The experimental design was done in randomized blocks, with 4 treatments and 6 replications (each replication was represented by a pen with two swines). The performance data were submitted to a variance analysis (ANOVA) and the results were compared by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the occurrence of diarrhea (among 2 treatments) was used the qui square test. There were no differences between treatments for performance parameters. The T1 presented the highest occurrence of diarrhea compared to the other treatments. The best economic efficiency results were observed to T4, T3, T1 and T2, respectively. The use of probiotics or antibiotics principles, on the applied doses, determined positive results in the performance of swines during nursery phase. |
id |
UEL-11_616ee89dfc25e920a8aae58051724994 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2917 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phaseUso de probiótico e de antibióticos na alimentação de leitões em fase de crecheMicrobiotaPerformanceDiarroheaSwine.MicrobiotaDesempenhoDiarréiaSuínos.The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the use of two probiotic doses compared with diets formulated with two antibiotics principles (tylosin and doxicycline+gentamicin) supplied to swines during nursery phase (ages of 21 to 63 days). Forty eight swines were submitted to the following treatments: T1 (Treatment 1) - diets with 39 ppm of tylosin phosphate; T2 (Treatment 2) - diets with 1.9 x 107 UFC/100g of ration; T3 (Treatment 3) - diets with 3.8 x 107 UFC/100g of ration and T4 (Treatment 4) - diets with 13.6 ppm of doxicycline chloridrate + 8.8 ppm of gentamicin sulfate. Were evaluated the daily weight gain, the daily feed intake, the feed conversion and the diarrhea occurrence. The experimental design was done in randomized blocks, with 4 treatments and 6 replications (each replication was represented by a pen with two swines). The performance data were submitted to a variance analysis (ANOVA) and the results were compared by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the occurrence of diarrhea (among 2 treatments) was used the qui square test. There were no differences between treatments for performance parameters. The T1 presented the highest occurrence of diarrhea compared to the other treatments. The best economic efficiency results were observed to T4, T3, T1 and T2, respectively. The use of probiotics or antibiotics principles, on the applied doses, determined positive results in the performance of swines during nursery phase.O experimento foi conduzido visando avaliar o uso de duas doses de probióticos comparadas com rações medicadas com dois princípios antimicrobianos (tilosina e doxiciclina+gentamicina) para leitões em fase de creche (21 a 63 dias de idade). Foram utilizados 48 animais submetidos aos seguintes tratamentos: T1- ração com 39 ppm de sulfato de tilosina ; T2 - ração com 1,9 x 107 UFC/100g de ração; T3 – ração com 3,8 x 107 UFC/100g de ração; e T4 – ração com 13,6 ppm de cloridrato de doxiciclina + 8,8 ppm de sulfato de gentamicina de doxigent. Foram avaliados o ganho diário de peso, o consumo diário de ração, a conversão alimentar e a ocorrência de diarréias. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados, com 4 tratamentos e 6 repetições (cada repetição foi representada por uma baia com 2 leitões). Os dados de desempenho foram submetidos à análise de variância e as médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey. Para a comparação da ocorrência de diarréia (entre dois tratamentos) foi utilizado o teste de qui-quadrado. Não foram observadas diferenças entre os tratamentos para os parâmetros de desempenho. Houve maior ocorrência de diarréia para o tratamento 1, comparado com cada um dos demais tratamentos. Os melhores resultados para índices de eficiência econômica foram, respectivamente, para T4, T3, T1 e T2. A utilização de probióticos ou dos princípios antimicrobianos, nas doses empregadas, determinam resultados positivos no desempenho de leitões na fase de creche.UEL2007-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/291710.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n4p739Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2007); 739-746Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 28 n. 4 (2007); 739-7461679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917/2474Silva, Caio Abércio daBridi, Ana MariaCastro-Gomez, Raul Jorge HernanSilva, Carla Renata Benitez daMenegucci, Christiane GualCarvalho, Bruna Bueno deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:38:55Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2917Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:38:55Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase Uso de probiótico e de antibióticos na alimentação de leitões em fase de creche |
title |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase |
spellingShingle |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase Silva, Caio Abércio da Microbiota Performance Diarrohea Swine. Microbiota Desempenho Diarréia Suínos. |
title_short |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase |
title_full |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase |
title_fullStr |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase |
title_full_unstemmed |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase |
title_sort |
Probiotic and antibiotics on swine feeding during nursery phase |
author |
Silva, Caio Abércio da |
author_facet |
Silva, Caio Abércio da Bridi, Ana Maria Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da Menegucci, Christiane Gual Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bridi, Ana Maria Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da Menegucci, Christiane Gual Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Caio Abércio da Bridi, Ana Maria Castro-Gomez, Raul Jorge Hernan Silva, Carla Renata Benitez da Menegucci, Christiane Gual Carvalho, Bruna Bueno de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Microbiota Performance Diarrohea Swine. Microbiota Desempenho Diarréia Suínos. |
topic |
Microbiota Performance Diarrohea Swine. Microbiota Desempenho Diarréia Suínos. |
description |
The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the use of two probiotic doses compared with diets formulated with two antibiotics principles (tylosin and doxicycline+gentamicin) supplied to swines during nursery phase (ages of 21 to 63 days). Forty eight swines were submitted to the following treatments: T1 (Treatment 1) - diets with 39 ppm of tylosin phosphate; T2 (Treatment 2) - diets with 1.9 x 107 UFC/100g of ration; T3 (Treatment 3) - diets with 3.8 x 107 UFC/100g of ration and T4 (Treatment 4) - diets with 13.6 ppm of doxicycline chloridrate + 8.8 ppm of gentamicin sulfate. Were evaluated the daily weight gain, the daily feed intake, the feed conversion and the diarrhea occurrence. The experimental design was done in randomized blocks, with 4 treatments and 6 replications (each replication was represented by a pen with two swines). The performance data were submitted to a variance analysis (ANOVA) and the results were compared by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the occurrence of diarrhea (among 2 treatments) was used the qui square test. There were no differences between treatments for performance parameters. The T1 presented the highest occurrence of diarrhea compared to the other treatments. The best economic efficiency results were observed to T4, T3, T1 and T2, respectively. The use of probiotics or antibiotics principles, on the applied doses, determined positive results in the performance of swines during nursery phase. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917 10.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n4p739 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2007v28n4p739 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2917/2474 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2007); 739-746 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 28 n. 4 (2007); 739-746 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306059192467456 |