Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to determine yield and income of ‘Todo ano’ bunching onion and ‘Asteca’ coriander, which were carried out in monocrop and intercrop systems with three (Ce3 and Co3) and four rows planted per plot. The work was developed in Dourados-MS, Brazil, between July 13th, and September 15th, 2004. Average yield of fresh mass of bunching onion plants under monocrop system had significative increase of 0.64 t ha-1 (92.75%) in relation to those under intercrop system (0.69 t ha-1). For coriander, yield of fresh mass of plants under monocrop system and with four rows per plot had significative increase of 1.43 t ha-1 (41.21%) in relation to those under three rows (3.47 t ha-1). Land Equivalant Ratio (LER) for bunching onion and coriander intercropped were superior in 21% (Ce3Co4) and 56% (Ce4Co3) in relation to monocrop system. For bunching onion producer, both intercrops were economic viable, but Ce4Co3 could have induced a higher gain per hectare (R$ 3,243.30). By the other side, for coriander producer, Ce3Co4 intercrop was the worst, because, although LER had been superior to 1.00, it could induce loss per hectare of R$ 99.42. Ce4Co3 intercrop was the best because it could induce a gain of R$ 777.77. |
id |
UEL-11_8ced1d3793d39325a6a635aaabe89a3f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2282 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systemsProdução e renda bruta de cebolinha e de coentro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciadoAllium fistulosumCoriandrum sativumIntercropIncome.Allium fistulosumCoriandrum sativumAssociação de culturasRetorno conômico.The objective of this work was to determine yield and income of ‘Todo ano’ bunching onion and ‘Asteca’ coriander, which were carried out in monocrop and intercrop systems with three (Ce3 and Co3) and four rows planted per plot. The work was developed in Dourados-MS, Brazil, between July 13th, and September 15th, 2004. Average yield of fresh mass of bunching onion plants under monocrop system had significative increase of 0.64 t ha-1 (92.75%) in relation to those under intercrop system (0.69 t ha-1). For coriander, yield of fresh mass of plants under monocrop system and with four rows per plot had significative increase of 1.43 t ha-1 (41.21%) in relation to those under three rows (3.47 t ha-1). Land Equivalant Ratio (LER) for bunching onion and coriander intercropped were superior in 21% (Ce3Co4) and 56% (Ce4Co3) in relation to monocrop system. For bunching onion producer, both intercrops were economic viable, but Ce4Co3 could have induced a higher gain per hectare (R$ 3,243.30). By the other side, for coriander producer, Ce3Co4 intercrop was the worst, because, although LER had been superior to 1.00, it could induce loss per hectare of R$ 99.42. Ce4Co3 intercrop was the best because it could induce a gain of R$ 777.77.O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar a produtividade e o retorno econômico da cebolinha ‘Todo Ano’ e do coentro ‘Asteca’, conduzidos em cultivo solteiro e consorciado, com três (Ce3 e Co3) e quatro (Ce4 e Co4) linhas de plantas por canteiro. O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, entre 13 de julho e 15 de setembro de 2004. A produção média de massa fresca das plantas de cebolinha sob cultivo solteiro teve aumento significativo de 0,64 t ha-1 (92,75%) em relação àquela sob consórcio (0,69 t ha-1). No coentro, a produção de massa fresca das plantas sob cultivo solteiro e com quatro linhas por canteiro teve aumento significativo de 1,43 t ha-1 (41,21%) em relação à produção sob três linhas (3,47 t ha-1). As razões de área equivalente (RAE) para os consórcios cebolinha e coentro foram superiores em 21% (Ce3Co4) e 56% (Ce4Co3) em relação aos cultivos solteiros. Para o produtor de cebolinha, os dois consórcios foram economicamente viáveis, mas o Ce4Co3 poderia ter induzido o maior ganho por hectare (R$ 3.243,30). Por outro lado, para o produtor de coentro, o consórcio Ce3Co4 foi o pior, já que, apesar de a RAE ter sido superior a 1,00, induziria perda por hectare de R$ 99,42. Já, o consórcio Ce4Co3 foi o melhor porque induziria ganho de R$ 777,77.UEL2005-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/228210.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n2p149Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2005); 149-154Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 2 (2005); 149-1541679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282/1959Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoOno, Fábio BeneditoSouza, Cleila Marcondes deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-10-08T12:20:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2282Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2009-10-08T12:20:10Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems Produção e renda bruta de cebolinha e de coentro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciado |
title |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems |
spellingShingle |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Allium fistulosum Coriandrum sativum Intercrop Income. Allium fistulosum Coriandrum sativum Associação de culturas Retorno conômico. |
title_short |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems |
title_full |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems |
title_fullStr |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems |
title_sort |
Yield and gross income of bunching onion and coriander in monocrop and intercrop systems |
author |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia |
author_facet |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Ono, Fábio Benedito Souza, Cleila Marcondes de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Maria do Carmo Ono, Fábio Benedito Souza, Cleila Marcondes de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Ono, Fábio Benedito Souza, Cleila Marcondes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Allium fistulosum Coriandrum sativum Intercrop Income. Allium fistulosum Coriandrum sativum Associação de culturas Retorno conômico. |
topic |
Allium fistulosum Coriandrum sativum Intercrop Income. Allium fistulosum Coriandrum sativum Associação de culturas Retorno conômico. |
description |
The objective of this work was to determine yield and income of ‘Todo ano’ bunching onion and ‘Asteca’ coriander, which were carried out in monocrop and intercrop systems with three (Ce3 and Co3) and four rows planted per plot. The work was developed in Dourados-MS, Brazil, between July 13th, and September 15th, 2004. Average yield of fresh mass of bunching onion plants under monocrop system had significative increase of 0.64 t ha-1 (92.75%) in relation to those under intercrop system (0.69 t ha-1). For coriander, yield of fresh mass of plants under monocrop system and with four rows per plot had significative increase of 1.43 t ha-1 (41.21%) in relation to those under three rows (3.47 t ha-1). Land Equivalant Ratio (LER) for bunching onion and coriander intercropped were superior in 21% (Ce3Co4) and 56% (Ce4Co3) in relation to monocrop system. For bunching onion producer, both intercrops were economic viable, but Ce4Co3 could have induced a higher gain per hectare (R$ 3,243.30). By the other side, for coriander producer, Ce3Co4 intercrop was the worst, because, although LER had been superior to 1.00, it could induce loss per hectare of R$ 99.42. Ce4Co3 intercrop was the best because it could induce a gain of R$ 777.77. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282 10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n2p149 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n2p149 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2282/1959 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2005); 149-154 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 2 (2005); 149-154 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306057602826240 |