Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12355 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was evaluate the best nutritional program for growing pigs, between five comercial diets with different levels of protein (high, medium and low), chrome picolinate and ractopamine for finishing pigs. Performance, carcass, economy and meat quality were evaluated. Seventy pigs (Pen Ar Lan) were used (35 barrows and 35 gilts) with initial weight ± standard deviation of 25.22 ± 2.5 kg and were slaughtered with final weight plus standard deviation of 119.08 ± 6.0kg. Difference between high protein and low protein + chrrome was observed to feed convertion during growth phases, with high protein showing better results. Difference was observed during finishing phase II to daily gain, showing better results for ractopamine over low protein. Muscle and fat deposition over carcass showed better results for ractopamine against low protein only. Lower levels of drip loss was observed for low protein and ractopamine treatments against higher levels of protein treatments. Ractopamine also showed the best cost when compared with all treatments and was the best nutritional program studied. |
id |
UEL-11_acfe104ef24b913dd4d1764e978d0f4a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12355 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigsEfeitos produtivos, qualitativos e econômicos de diferentes programas nutricionais para suínos em crescimento e terminaçãoAmino acidsCarcassLysineMuscleStress.AminoácidosCarcaçaLisinaMúsculo.Nutrição AnimalThe objective of this work was evaluate the best nutritional program for growing pigs, between five comercial diets with different levels of protein (high, medium and low), chrome picolinate and ractopamine for finishing pigs. Performance, carcass, economy and meat quality were evaluated. Seventy pigs (Pen Ar Lan) were used (35 barrows and 35 gilts) with initial weight ± standard deviation of 25.22 ± 2.5 kg and were slaughtered with final weight plus standard deviation of 119.08 ± 6.0kg. Difference between high protein and low protein + chrrome was observed to feed convertion during growth phases, with high protein showing better results. Difference was observed during finishing phase II to daily gain, showing better results for ractopamine over low protein. Muscle and fat deposition over carcass showed better results for ractopamine against low protein only. Lower levels of drip loss was observed for low protein and ractopamine treatments against higher levels of protein treatments. Ractopamine also showed the best cost when compared with all treatments and was the best nutritional program studied.O objetivo neste trabalho foi avaliar o melhor programa nutricional para suínos em engorda, entre cinco formulações comerciais a partir do uso de diferentes níveis de proteína total (alta, média e baixa), picolinato de cromo (Cr) e ractopamina (Rac) no final da terminação. Os tratamentos foram avaliados para desempenho, características de carcaça, aspectos econômicos e qualidade de carne. Foram utilizados 70 suínos de linhagem comercial Pen Ar Lan (35 machos castrados e 35 fêmeas) com peso médio inicial ± desvio padrão de 25,22 ± 2,5 kg e peso final de abate ± desvio padrão de 119,08 ± 6,0kg. Para as fases iniciais de crescimento, foi observada diferença para a conversão alimentar com a ração com alta proteína apresentando melhor conversão alimentar em relação à ração com picolinato de cromo. Para a fase de terminação II, foi observada diferença no ganho diário de peso, com o programa com ractopamina apresentando melhores resultados apenas em relação ao programa com baixa proteína. Também houve diferença na deposição de músculo e gordura na carcaça em favor da ractopamina, quando comparada com a ração de baixa proteína. Observou-se diferença para a perda de água por gotejamento para ractopamina e baixa proteína em relação aos maiores níveis desse nutriente. A ractopamina também mostrou-se a mais eficiente economicamente. Para os aspectos estudados neste trabalho, entre os programas nutricionais testados, a ractopamina mostrou-se a mais eficiente.UEL2013-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1235510.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3323Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 6Supl2 (2012); 3323-3340Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 6Supl2 (2012); 3323-33401679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12355/pdfCopyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Eduardo RaeleSilva, Caio Abércio daBridi, Ana MariaGavioli, David FernandesLozano, Arturo PardoAndreo, NayaraSilva, Roberta Abrami MonteiroOliveira, Jamile Maria deMoreira, Valéria SantosTarsitano, Marina Avena2023-01-26T16:01:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12355Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-26T16:01:54Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs Efeitos produtivos, qualitativos e econômicos de diferentes programas nutricionais para suínos em crescimento e terminação |
title |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs |
spellingShingle |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs Oliveira, Eduardo Raele Amino acids Carcass Lysine Muscle Stress. Aminoácidos Carcaça Lisina Músculo. Nutrição Animal |
title_short |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs |
title_full |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs |
title_fullStr |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs |
title_sort |
Productive, economic and qualitative effects of different nutritional programs for growing and finishing pigs |
author |
Oliveira, Eduardo Raele |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Eduardo Raele Silva, Caio Abércio da Bridi, Ana Maria Gavioli, David Fernandes Lozano, Arturo Pardo Andreo, Nayara Silva, Roberta Abrami Monteiro Oliveira, Jamile Maria de Moreira, Valéria Santos Tarsitano, Marina Avena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Caio Abércio da Bridi, Ana Maria Gavioli, David Fernandes Lozano, Arturo Pardo Andreo, Nayara Silva, Roberta Abrami Monteiro Oliveira, Jamile Maria de Moreira, Valéria Santos Tarsitano, Marina Avena |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Eduardo Raele Silva, Caio Abércio da Bridi, Ana Maria Gavioli, David Fernandes Lozano, Arturo Pardo Andreo, Nayara Silva, Roberta Abrami Monteiro Oliveira, Jamile Maria de Moreira, Valéria Santos Tarsitano, Marina Avena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amino acids Carcass Lysine Muscle Stress. Aminoácidos Carcaça Lisina Músculo. Nutrição Animal |
topic |
Amino acids Carcass Lysine Muscle Stress. Aminoácidos Carcaça Lisina Músculo. Nutrição Animal |
description |
The objective of this work was evaluate the best nutritional program for growing pigs, between five comercial diets with different levels of protein (high, medium and low), chrome picolinate and ractopamine for finishing pigs. Performance, carcass, economy and meat quality were evaluated. Seventy pigs (Pen Ar Lan) were used (35 barrows and 35 gilts) with initial weight ± standard deviation of 25.22 ± 2.5 kg and were slaughtered with final weight plus standard deviation of 119.08 ± 6.0kg. Difference between high protein and low protein + chrrome was observed to feed convertion during growth phases, with high protein showing better results. Difference was observed during finishing phase II to daily gain, showing better results for ractopamine over low protein. Muscle and fat deposition over carcass showed better results for ractopamine against low protein only. Lower levels of drip loss was observed for low protein and ractopamine treatments against higher levels of protein treatments. Ractopamine also showed the best cost when compared with all treatments and was the best nutritional program studied. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12355 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3323 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12355 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3323 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12355/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 6Supl2 (2012); 3323-3340 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 6Supl2 (2012); 3323-3340 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306067374505984 |