Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Halperin, Paula
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Antíteses
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498
Resumo: This article analyzes the debate in the Brazilian mainstream press about the agreement signed between Rede Globo and midia conglomerate Time-Life in 1962. It seeks to illuminate the position of the main newspapers within the complex political configuration created by the military coup in 1964. The debate originated in the Rio de Janeiro that year revolved around the unconstitutionality of foreign investments in national media companies. Carlos Lacerda, then governor of Guanabara, carried out a real public campaign of denunciation considering the agreement antinational and in violation of the Constitution (which prohibited foreign groups from owning or investing in media companies). In 1966, the public discussion had expanded to São Paulo, and the pressure exerted by the press had the Parliament forced to formally investigate the agreement. In March 1967, the federal government declared the allegations unfounded, closing the inquiry. The article contributes to the debate about the historicization of the political process developed in those first three years of government and the complex place the press had in it.
id UEL-13_74647fa4d5e82f95d858a7f9615c47f4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36498
network_acronym_str UEL-13
network_name_str Antíteses
repository_id_str
spelling Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967Entre a invasão dos “capitais alienígenas” e a consolidação da televisão: Imprensa e debates públicos em torno ao acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life, 1964-1967History of the pressBrazilian military dictatorshipRede Globo/Time-Life agrémentHistory of Rede GloboHistóriaHistória da imprensaDitadura militarAcordo Rede Globo/Time-LifeHistória da Rede GloboHistóriaThis article analyzes the debate in the Brazilian mainstream press about the agreement signed between Rede Globo and midia conglomerate Time-Life in 1962. It seeks to illuminate the position of the main newspapers within the complex political configuration created by the military coup in 1964. The debate originated in the Rio de Janeiro that year revolved around the unconstitutionality of foreign investments in national media companies. Carlos Lacerda, then governor of Guanabara, carried out a real public campaign of denunciation considering the agreement antinational and in violation of the Constitution (which prohibited foreign groups from owning or investing in media companies). In 1966, the public discussion had expanded to São Paulo, and the pressure exerted by the press had the Parliament forced to formally investigate the agreement. In March 1967, the federal government declared the allegations unfounded, closing the inquiry. The article contributes to the debate about the historicization of the political process developed in those first three years of government and the complex place the press had in it.O presente artigo analisa o debate ocorrido na grande imprensa sobre o acordo assinado entre a Rede Globo e o conglomerado norte-americano Time-Life em 1962, iluminando o posicionamento dos jornais dentro da nova e complexa configuração política suscitada pelo golpe militar. O debate originado nos jornais cariocas em 1964 girou em torno à inconstitucionalidade dos investimentos estrangeiros nas empresas jornalísticas nacionais. Carlos Lacerda, então governador da Guanabara, levou adiante uma verdadeira campanha pública de denúncia sobre o assunto, por considerar o acordo antinacional e em violação da Constituição (que proibia grupos estrangeiros de intervir em empresas de comunicação). Em 1966, a discussão pública sobre o assunto tinha se expandido a São Paulo, tendo a pressão exercida pela imprensa alcançado um efeito tal que a Câmara dos Deputados se viu forçada a instalar uma CPI para investigar o dito acordo. Em março de 1967, o governo Castelo Branco declarou infundadas as acusações sobre o caso, arquivando o inquérito. O artigo contribui ao debate sobre a historização do processo político conformado durante esses três primeiros anos de governo e o complexo lugar da imprensa nesse momento fundante de edificação da base autoritária do regime que duraria mais de duas décadas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliadoPesquisa históricaPesquisa históricaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/3649810.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n23p579Antíteses; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-601Antíteses; v. 12 n. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-6011984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498/25890Copyright (c) 2019 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHalperin, Paula2021-05-13T13:41:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36498Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2021-05-13T13:41:22Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
Entre a invasão dos “capitais alienígenas” e a consolidação da televisão: Imprensa e debates públicos em torno ao acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life, 1964-1967
title Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
spellingShingle Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
Halperin, Paula
History of the press
Brazilian military dictatorship
Rede Globo/Time-Life agrément
History of Rede Globo
História
História da imprensa
Ditadura militar
Acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life
História da Rede Globo
História
title_short Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
title_full Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
title_fullStr Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
title_full_unstemmed Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
title_sort Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
author Halperin, Paula
author_facet Halperin, Paula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Halperin, Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv History of the press
Brazilian military dictatorship
Rede Globo/Time-Life agrément
History of Rede Globo
História
História da imprensa
Ditadura militar
Acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life
História da Rede Globo
História
topic History of the press
Brazilian military dictatorship
Rede Globo/Time-Life agrément
History of Rede Globo
História
História da imprensa
Ditadura militar
Acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life
História da Rede Globo
História
description This article analyzes the debate in the Brazilian mainstream press about the agreement signed between Rede Globo and midia conglomerate Time-Life in 1962. It seeks to illuminate the position of the main newspapers within the complex political configuration created by the military coup in 1964. The debate originated in the Rio de Janeiro that year revolved around the unconstitutionality of foreign investments in national media companies. Carlos Lacerda, then governor of Guanabara, carried out a real public campaign of denunciation considering the agreement antinational and in violation of the Constitution (which prohibited foreign groups from owning or investing in media companies). In 1966, the public discussion had expanded to São Paulo, and the pressure exerted by the press had the Parliament forced to formally investigate the agreement. In March 1967, the federal government declared the allegations unfounded, closing the inquiry. The article contributes to the debate about the historicization of the political process developed in those first three years of government and the complex place the press had in it.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
avaliado
Pesquisa histórica
Pesquisa histórica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498
10.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n23p579
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n23p579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498/25890
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Antíteses
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Antíteses
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antíteses; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-601
Antíteses; v. 12 n. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-601
1984-3356
reponame:Antíteses
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Antíteses
collection Antíteses
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv antiteses@uel.br||
_version_ 1797069048469520384