Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antíteses |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the debate in the Brazilian mainstream press about the agreement signed between Rede Globo and midia conglomerate Time-Life in 1962. It seeks to illuminate the position of the main newspapers within the complex political configuration created by the military coup in 1964. The debate originated in the Rio de Janeiro that year revolved around the unconstitutionality of foreign investments in national media companies. Carlos Lacerda, then governor of Guanabara, carried out a real public campaign of denunciation considering the agreement antinational and in violation of the Constitution (which prohibited foreign groups from owning or investing in media companies). In 1966, the public discussion had expanded to São Paulo, and the pressure exerted by the press had the Parliament forced to formally investigate the agreement. In March 1967, the federal government declared the allegations unfounded, closing the inquiry. The article contributes to the debate about the historicization of the political process developed in those first three years of government and the complex place the press had in it. |
id |
UEL-13_74647fa4d5e82f95d858a7f9615c47f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36498 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-13 |
network_name_str |
Antíteses |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967Entre a invasão dos “capitais alienígenas” e a consolidação da televisão: Imprensa e debates públicos em torno ao acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life, 1964-1967History of the pressBrazilian military dictatorshipRede Globo/Time-Life agrémentHistory of Rede GloboHistóriaHistória da imprensaDitadura militarAcordo Rede Globo/Time-LifeHistória da Rede GloboHistóriaThis article analyzes the debate in the Brazilian mainstream press about the agreement signed between Rede Globo and midia conglomerate Time-Life in 1962. It seeks to illuminate the position of the main newspapers within the complex political configuration created by the military coup in 1964. The debate originated in the Rio de Janeiro that year revolved around the unconstitutionality of foreign investments in national media companies. Carlos Lacerda, then governor of Guanabara, carried out a real public campaign of denunciation considering the agreement antinational and in violation of the Constitution (which prohibited foreign groups from owning or investing in media companies). In 1966, the public discussion had expanded to São Paulo, and the pressure exerted by the press had the Parliament forced to formally investigate the agreement. In March 1967, the federal government declared the allegations unfounded, closing the inquiry. The article contributes to the debate about the historicization of the political process developed in those first three years of government and the complex place the press had in it.O presente artigo analisa o debate ocorrido na grande imprensa sobre o acordo assinado entre a Rede Globo e o conglomerado norte-americano Time-Life em 1962, iluminando o posicionamento dos jornais dentro da nova e complexa configuração política suscitada pelo golpe militar. O debate originado nos jornais cariocas em 1964 girou em torno à inconstitucionalidade dos investimentos estrangeiros nas empresas jornalísticas nacionais. Carlos Lacerda, então governador da Guanabara, levou adiante uma verdadeira campanha pública de denúncia sobre o assunto, por considerar o acordo antinacional e em violação da Constituição (que proibia grupos estrangeiros de intervir em empresas de comunicação). Em 1966, a discussão pública sobre o assunto tinha se expandido a São Paulo, tendo a pressão exercida pela imprensa alcançado um efeito tal que a Câmara dos Deputados se viu forçada a instalar uma CPI para investigar o dito acordo. Em março de 1967, o governo Castelo Branco declarou infundadas as acusações sobre o caso, arquivando o inquérito. O artigo contribui ao debate sobre a historização do processo político conformado durante esses três primeiros anos de governo e o complexo lugar da imprensa nesse momento fundante de edificação da base autoritária do regime que duraria mais de duas décadas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliadoPesquisa históricaPesquisa históricaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/3649810.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n23p579Antíteses; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-601Antíteses; v. 12 n. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-6011984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498/25890Copyright (c) 2019 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHalperin, Paula2021-05-13T13:41:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36498Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2021-05-13T13:41:22Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 Entre a invasão dos “capitais alienígenas” e a consolidação da televisão: Imprensa e debates públicos em torno ao acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life, 1964-1967 |
title |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 |
spellingShingle |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 Halperin, Paula History of the press Brazilian military dictatorship Rede Globo/Time-Life agrément History of Rede Globo História História da imprensa Ditadura militar Acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life História da Rede Globo História |
title_short |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 |
title_full |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 |
title_fullStr |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 |
title_sort |
Between the invasion of “foreign capitals” and the consolidation of television: The press and the public debates around the Rede Globo/Time-Life agreement, 1964-1967 |
author |
Halperin, Paula |
author_facet |
Halperin, Paula |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Halperin, Paula |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
History of the press Brazilian military dictatorship Rede Globo/Time-Life agrément History of Rede Globo História História da imprensa Ditadura militar Acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life História da Rede Globo História |
topic |
History of the press Brazilian military dictatorship Rede Globo/Time-Life agrément History of Rede Globo História História da imprensa Ditadura militar Acordo Rede Globo/Time-Life História da Rede Globo História |
description |
This article analyzes the debate in the Brazilian mainstream press about the agreement signed between Rede Globo and midia conglomerate Time-Life in 1962. It seeks to illuminate the position of the main newspapers within the complex political configuration created by the military coup in 1964. The debate originated in the Rio de Janeiro that year revolved around the unconstitutionality of foreign investments in national media companies. Carlos Lacerda, then governor of Guanabara, carried out a real public campaign of denunciation considering the agreement antinational and in violation of the Constitution (which prohibited foreign groups from owning or investing in media companies). In 1966, the public discussion had expanded to São Paulo, and the pressure exerted by the press had the Parliament forced to formally investigate the agreement. In March 1967, the federal government declared the allegations unfounded, closing the inquiry. The article contributes to the debate about the historicization of the political process developed in those first three years of government and the complex place the press had in it. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion avaliado Pesquisa histórica Pesquisa histórica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498 10.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n23p579 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n23p579 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/36498/25890 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Antíteses info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Antíteses |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-601 Antíteses; v. 12 n. 23 (2019): Revistas Culturales de iberoamérica; 579-601 1984-3356 reponame:Antíteses instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Antíteses |
collection |
Antíteses |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
antiteses@uel.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069048469520384 |