Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antíteses |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/47610 |
Resumo: | The main argument consists in the acceptance of a non-anthropocentric Amerindian cosmological imperative that forest can be understood by the Human Sciences as an active historical subject, producer of knowledge, meanings and communications, even if it is not symbolic or humanly linguistic. For this purpose, we are going to realize a theoretical and anthropological discussion of ethnographic writings in the sense of supporting the possibility of understanding as epistemologically valid the existence of a semiotic, which grounds the recognition and intercommunication between animals-humans, animals non-humans and other kingdoms in forest cohabitation, understanding forest itself as a subjectively constituted and self-determined entity. To achieve that understanding we are going to divide our writing into two parts. First, we are going to study the anthropology of Eduardo Kohn about a semiotics of forests, which confers them an active subject status, as producers of knowledge and languages. In the second part of our paper, we are going to address the concept of terricídio, as thought by the leaders of the Movimiento de Mujeres Indígenas por el Buen Vivir nation in the claim for legal recognition of the murder of forests as a heinous crime. Such process is established precisely by recognizing the sacred, individual, communicational, cognitive and thinking character of forests and their complex interrelational network of coexisting inhabitants. |
id |
UEL-13_8348b6475e781af022256e077a7ed93b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47610 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-13 |
network_name_str |
Antíteses |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thoughtLos bosques como sujeto y el terricídio: una semiología epistemológica desde el pensamiento amerindioAs florestas como sujeito e o terricídio: uma semiologia epistemológica a partir do pensamento ameríndioForestsEpistemologySemioticsTerricídioEthnographyBosquesEpistemologíaSemióticaTerricídioEtnografíaFlorestasEpistemologiaSemióticaTerricídioEtnografiaThe main argument consists in the acceptance of a non-anthropocentric Amerindian cosmological imperative that forest can be understood by the Human Sciences as an active historical subject, producer of knowledge, meanings and communications, even if it is not symbolic or humanly linguistic. For this purpose, we are going to realize a theoretical and anthropological discussion of ethnographic writings in the sense of supporting the possibility of understanding as epistemologically valid the existence of a semiotic, which grounds the recognition and intercommunication between animals-humans, animals non-humans and other kingdoms in forest cohabitation, understanding forest itself as a subjectively constituted and self-determined entity. To achieve that understanding we are going to divide our writing into two parts. First, we are going to study the anthropology of Eduardo Kohn about a semiotics of forests, which confers them an active subject status, as producers of knowledge and languages. In the second part of our paper, we are going to address the concept of terricídio, as thought by the leaders of the Movimiento de Mujeres Indígenas por el Buen Vivir nation in the claim for legal recognition of the murder of forests as a heinous crime. Such process is established precisely by recognizing the sacred, individual, communicational, cognitive and thinking character of forests and their complex interrelational network of coexisting inhabitants.El argumento principal reside en la aceptación de un imperativo cosmológico amerindio no antropocéntrico de que el bosque puede ser tomado por las Ciencias Humanas como un sujeto histórico activo, productor de conocimientos, significados y comunicaciones, incluso si no son simbólicas o humanamente lingüísticas. Para ello, realizaremos una discusión bibliográfica teórica y antropológica de escritos etnográficos con el fin de sustentar la posibilidad de entender como epistemológicamente válida la existencia de una semiótica activa, que subyace al reconocimiento e intercomunicación entre humanos-animales, animales no humanos y otros reinos en la silvicultura de convivencia, entendiendo el propio bosque como una entidad subjetivamente constituida y autodeterminada. Para lograr tal comprensión, dividiremos nuestro escrito en dos partes. En el primero, estudiaremos la antropología de Eduardo Kohn sobre una semiótica de los bosques, que lega a los bosques un estatus de sujeto activo, como productores de conocimientos y lenguajes. En la segunda parte de nuestro artículo abordaremos el concepto de terricidio, tal como lo pensaron voceras del Movimiento de Mujeres Indígenas por el Buen Vivir en el reclamo por el reconocimiento legal del asesinato de los bosques como un crimen atroz. Este proceso se establece precisamente al reconocer el carácter sagrado, individual, comunicacional, cognitivo y pensante de los bosques y su compleja red interrelacional de habitantes convivientes.O argumento principal reside na aceitação de um imperativo cosmológico ameríndio não-antropocêntrico de que a floresta pode ser tomada pelas Ciências Humanas como sujeito histórico ativo, produtor de conhecimentos, significações e comunicações, mesmo que não-simbólicas ou humanamente linguísticas. Para isso realizaremos uma discussão bibliográfica teórica e antropológica de escritos etnográficos no sentido de sustentar a possibilidade de compreender como epistemologicamente válida a existência de uma ativa semiótica, que fundamenta o reconhecimento e intercomunicação entre animais-humanos, animais não-humanos e demais reinos em coabitação florestal, compreendendo a própria floresta como um ente subjetivamente constituído e autodeterminado. Para alcançar tal compreensão dividiremos nosso escrito em duas partes. Na primeira estudaremos a antropologia de Eduardo Kohn acerca de uma semiótica das florestas, que legam às florestas um status ativo de sujeito, enquanto produtoras de saberes e linguagens. Na segunda parte de nosso artigo abordaremos o conceito de terricídio, tal como pensado por porta-vozes do Movimiento de Mujeres Indígenas por el Buen Vivir na reivindicação do reconhecimento jurídico do assassinato dos bosques como crime hediondo. Tal processo se estabelece justamente pelo reconhecimento do caráter sagrado, individual, comunicacional, cognitivo e pensante das florestas e sua complexa rede interrelacional de habitantes em coexistência.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-09-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/4761010.5433/1984-3356.2023v16n31p025-058Antíteses; Vol. 16 No. 31 (2023): "Forests' histories and forests in stories and memories: dialogues between past, present and future"; 025-058Antíteses; v. 16 n. 31 (2023): "Histórias das florestas e florestas nas estórias e memórias: diálogos entre passado, presente e futuro"; 025-0581984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/47610/49452Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Bagiotto Bottonhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBotton, Fernando Bagiotto2023-10-10T14:46:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47610Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2023-10-10T14:46:34Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought Los bosques como sujeto y el terricídio: una semiología epistemológica desde el pensamiento amerindio As florestas como sujeito e o terricídio: uma semiologia epistemológica a partir do pensamento ameríndio |
title |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought |
spellingShingle |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought Botton, Fernando Bagiotto Forests Epistemology Semiotics Terricídio Ethnography Bosques Epistemología Semiótica Terricídio Etnografía Florestas Epistemologia Semiótica Terricídio Etnografia |
title_short |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought |
title_full |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought |
title_fullStr |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought |
title_sort |
Forests as subject and terricídio: an epistemological semiology from the amerindian thought |
author |
Botton, Fernando Bagiotto |
author_facet |
Botton, Fernando Bagiotto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Botton, Fernando Bagiotto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Forests Epistemology Semiotics Terricídio Ethnography Bosques Epistemología Semiótica Terricídio Etnografía Florestas Epistemologia Semiótica Terricídio Etnografia |
topic |
Forests Epistemology Semiotics Terricídio Ethnography Bosques Epistemología Semiótica Terricídio Etnografía Florestas Epistemologia Semiótica Terricídio Etnografia |
description |
The main argument consists in the acceptance of a non-anthropocentric Amerindian cosmological imperative that forest can be understood by the Human Sciences as an active historical subject, producer of knowledge, meanings and communications, even if it is not symbolic or humanly linguistic. For this purpose, we are going to realize a theoretical and anthropological discussion of ethnographic writings in the sense of supporting the possibility of understanding as epistemologically valid the existence of a semiotic, which grounds the recognition and intercommunication between animals-humans, animals non-humans and other kingdoms in forest cohabitation, understanding forest itself as a subjectively constituted and self-determined entity. To achieve that understanding we are going to divide our writing into two parts. First, we are going to study the anthropology of Eduardo Kohn about a semiotics of forests, which confers them an active subject status, as producers of knowledge and languages. In the second part of our paper, we are going to address the concept of terricídio, as thought by the leaders of the Movimiento de Mujeres Indígenas por el Buen Vivir nation in the claim for legal recognition of the murder of forests as a heinous crime. Such process is established precisely by recognizing the sacred, individual, communicational, cognitive and thinking character of forests and their complex interrelational network of coexisting inhabitants. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/47610 10.5433/1984-3356.2023v16n31p025-058 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/47610 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1984-3356.2023v16n31p025-058 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/47610/49452 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Bagiotto Botton https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Bagiotto Botton https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses; Vol. 16 No. 31 (2023): "Forests' histories and forests in stories and memories: dialogues between past, present and future"; 025-058 Antíteses; v. 16 n. 31 (2023): "Histórias das florestas e florestas nas estórias e memórias: diálogos entre passado, presente e futuro"; 025-058 1984-3356 reponame:Antíteses instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Antíteses |
collection |
Antíteses |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
antiteses@uel.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069044209156096 |