The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Malaquias da Silva, Mário Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/7578
Resumo:  The power to decide in public matter is studied here under the optics of the new constitutionalism after positivism, where the discretional duties, granted by the administration law, possess a reduced edge taking in mind the Proportionality. Principle. In this context, the administrator, when carrying through a judgment of convenience and chance of the measure, will have to observe the elements simultaneously (adequacy, necessity and proportionality in strict direction), that they compose the proportionality principle. Soon, the interpretation of the indeterminate mean concepts in the norm is not the administrator competence in face of the individual rights. It´s not only the search for the public interest consecrated in the norm, but balance between the purpose of the norm and the individual rights present in the Constitution of the Republic of 1988.  
id UEL-2_07f593e507748a8f18a1696c953ceed6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7578
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decideO princípio da proporcionalidade como limitador da discricionariedade administrativaPower to decide by the State AdministratorJuridical ControlProportionality. The power to decide in public matter is studied here under the optics of the new constitutionalism after positivism, where the discretional duties, granted by the administration law, possess a reduced edge taking in mind the Proportionality. Principle. In this context, the administrator, when carrying through a judgment of convenience and chance of the measure, will have to observe the elements simultaneously (adequacy, necessity and proportionality in strict direction), that they compose the proportionality principle. Soon, the interpretation of the indeterminate mean concepts in the norm is not the administrator competence in face of the individual rights. It´s not only the search for the public interest consecrated in the norm, but balance between the purpose of the norm and the individual rights present in the Constitution of the Republic of 1988.  A discricionariedade é estudada aqui sob a ótica do neoconstitucionalismo e do pós-psitivismo, onde o dever discricionário, outorgado pela lei ao administrador, possui uma margem reduzida à vista do princípio da proporcionalidade. Neste contexto, o administrador, ao realizar um juízo de convêniência e oportunidade da medida, deverá observar simultaneamente os elementos (adequação, necessidade e proporcionalidade em sentido estrito), que compõem o princípio da proporcionalidade. Logo, a interpretação dos conceitos indeterminados ou pluris significativos contidos na norma não estão ao alvedrio do administrador em face dos direitos individuais. Nessa diretriz, não basta a mera busca do interesse público contido na norma, mas o equilíbrio entre esta finalidade e os direitos individuais consagrados no bojo da Constituição da República de 1988.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2010-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/757810.5433/1980-511X.2010v5n1p233Revista do Direito Público; v. 5 n. 1 (2010); 233-2611980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/7578/6663Malaquias da Silva, Mário Henriqueinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-16T16:44:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7578Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2017-03-16T16:44:22Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
O princípio da proporcionalidade como limitador da discricionariedade administrativa
title The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
spellingShingle The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
Malaquias da Silva, Mário Henrique
Power to decide by the State Administrator
Juridical Control
Proportionality.
title_short The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
title_full The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
title_fullStr The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
title_full_unstemmed The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
title_sort The beginning of the proportionality as limit for the state administrator power do decide
author Malaquias da Silva, Mário Henrique
author_facet Malaquias da Silva, Mário Henrique
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Malaquias da Silva, Mário Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Power to decide by the State Administrator
Juridical Control
Proportionality.
topic Power to decide by the State Administrator
Juridical Control
Proportionality.
description  The power to decide in public matter is studied here under the optics of the new constitutionalism after positivism, where the discretional duties, granted by the administration law, possess a reduced edge taking in mind the Proportionality. Principle. In this context, the administrator, when carrying through a judgment of convenience and chance of the measure, will have to observe the elements simultaneously (adequacy, necessity and proportionality in strict direction), that they compose the proportionality principle. Soon, the interpretation of the indeterminate mean concepts in the norm is not the administrator competence in face of the individual rights. It´s not only the search for the public interest consecrated in the norm, but balance between the purpose of the norm and the individual rights present in the Constitution of the Republic of 1988.  
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/7578
10.5433/1980-511X.2010v5n1p233
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/7578
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2010v5n1p233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/7578/6663
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 5 n. 1 (2010); 233-261
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305929559113728

Registros relacionados