ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47309 |
Resumo: | With the advent of Covid-19 in Brazil, there was aneed to confine the population. As a result, several sectors wereaffected, including the judiciary. New means of dispute resolutionwere sought, including extrajudicial means and the use of newtechnologies. Thus, Provision No. 100/2020 of the NationalCouncil of Justice (CNJ) emerged, which provided for thepractice of electronic notarial acts by notary offices. This studyverifies the following questions: did the “E-notariat” platform,implemented from Provision n° 100, reach the desired levels toexpand the right of access to justice? Was there continuity, inthe post-pandemic period, in the use of this tool? The objectiveis to analyze the effectiveness of the “E-notariat”, as a way ofexpanding access to Justice. This research is justified by virtueof the constant need to expand resources for access to justiceand to promote non-judicialization. For that, we resorted tobibliographical research – based on the authors Cappelletti,Garth, Watanabe and others; and documentary research – throughthe “Notary in Numbers” reports. The research method washypothetical-deductive. Indeed, it was seen that the “E-Notarial”platform was successful, bringing speed and practicality tocitizens, thus allowing the expansion of access to justice. |
id |
UEL-2_12c282d24bde5cb01e4f6a7e70010aa8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47309 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJATOS NOTARIAIS ELETRÔNICOS – E-NOTARIADO:: AMPLIAÇÃO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA COM O ADVENTO DO COVID-19 – UMA ANÁLISE DO PROVIMENTO 100 DO CNJacesso à justiçadesjudicializaçãoserventias extrajudiciaisatos eletrônicosprovimento n° 100 do CNJaccess to justicedejudicializationextrajudicial serviceselectronic actsprovision no 100 CNJWith the advent of Covid-19 in Brazil, there was aneed to confine the population. As a result, several sectors wereaffected, including the judiciary. New means of dispute resolutionwere sought, including extrajudicial means and the use of newtechnologies. Thus, Provision No. 100/2020 of the NationalCouncil of Justice (CNJ) emerged, which provided for thepractice of electronic notarial acts by notary offices. This studyverifies the following questions: did the “E-notariat” platform,implemented from Provision n° 100, reach the desired levels toexpand the right of access to justice? Was there continuity, inthe post-pandemic period, in the use of this tool? The objectiveis to analyze the effectiveness of the “E-notariat”, as a way ofexpanding access to Justice. This research is justified by virtueof the constant need to expand resources for access to justiceand to promote non-judicialization. For that, we resorted tobibliographical research – based on the authors Cappelletti,Garth, Watanabe and others; and documentary research – throughthe “Notary in Numbers” reports. The research method washypothetical-deductive. Indeed, it was seen that the “E-Notarial”platform was successful, bringing speed and practicality tocitizens, thus allowing the expansion of access to justice.Com o advento da Covid-19 no Brasil, houve anecessidade de confinamento da população. Com isso, diversossetores foram afetados, inclusive o Judiciário. Buscou-se novosmeios de solução de controvérsias, incluindo as vias extrajudiciaise o uso de novas tecnologias. Surgiu, assim, o Provimento n°100/2020 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), que dispôssobre a prática de atos notariais eletrônicos pelos tabelionatosde notas. Este estudo verifica as seguintes questões: a plataformado “E-notariado”, implementada a partir do Provimento n° 100,alcançou os patamares desejados para ampliar o direito de acessoà justiça? Houve continuidade, no período pós pandêmico, do usodesta ferramenta? Tem-se como objetivo analisar a efetividadedo “E-notariado”, como forma de ampliação do acesso à Justiça.A pesquisa se justifica em virtude da necessidade constante deampliar os recursos para o acesso à justiça e de promover adesjudicialização. Para tanto, recorreu-se à pesquisa bibliográfica– pautada nos autores Cappelletti, Garth, Watanabe entre outros;e à pesquisa documental – por meio dos relatórios “Cartórioem Números”. O método de pesquisa foi o hipotético-dedutivo.Com efeito, viu-se que a plataforma “E-Notariado” foi exitosa,trazendo celeridade e praticidade para os cidadãos, permitindo,assim, a ampliação do acesso à justiça.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2024-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4730910.5433/1980-511X.2024.v19.n1.47309Revista do Direito Público; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Revista do Direito Público ; 240-2581980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47309/50346Copyright (c) 2024 Rosana de Cássia Ferreira, Ricardo Gorettihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Rosana de CássiaGoretti, Ricardo2024-05-16T12:13:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47309Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2024-05-16T12:13:45Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ ATOS NOTARIAIS ELETRÔNICOS – E-NOTARIADO:: AMPLIAÇÃO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA COM O ADVENTO DO COVID-19 – UMA ANÁLISE DO PROVIMENTO 100 DO CNJ |
title |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ |
spellingShingle |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia acesso à justiça desjudicialização serventias extrajudiciais atos eletrônicos provimento n° 100 do CNJ access to justice dejudicialization extrajudicial services electronic acts provision no 100 CNJ |
title_short |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ |
title_full |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ |
title_fullStr |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ |
title_full_unstemmed |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ |
title_sort |
ELECTRONIC NOTARY DEEDS - E-NOTARIAT:: EXPANSION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE WITH THE ADVENT OF COVID-19 – AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISION 100 OF CNJ |
author |
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia Goretti, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Goretti, Ricardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Rosana de Cássia Goretti, Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
acesso à justiça desjudicialização serventias extrajudiciais atos eletrônicos provimento n° 100 do CNJ access to justice dejudicialization extrajudicial services electronic acts provision no 100 CNJ |
topic |
acesso à justiça desjudicialização serventias extrajudiciais atos eletrônicos provimento n° 100 do CNJ access to justice dejudicialization extrajudicial services electronic acts provision no 100 CNJ |
description |
With the advent of Covid-19 in Brazil, there was aneed to confine the population. As a result, several sectors wereaffected, including the judiciary. New means of dispute resolutionwere sought, including extrajudicial means and the use of newtechnologies. Thus, Provision No. 100/2020 of the NationalCouncil of Justice (CNJ) emerged, which provided for thepractice of electronic notarial acts by notary offices. This studyverifies the following questions: did the “E-notariat” platform,implemented from Provision n° 100, reach the desired levels toexpand the right of access to justice? Was there continuity, inthe post-pandemic period, in the use of this tool? The objectiveis to analyze the effectiveness of the “E-notariat”, as a way ofexpanding access to Justice. This research is justified by virtueof the constant need to expand resources for access to justiceand to promote non-judicialization. For that, we resorted tobibliographical research – based on the authors Cappelletti,Garth, Watanabe and others; and documentary research – throughthe “Notary in Numbers” reports. The research method washypothetical-deductive. Indeed, it was seen that the “E-Notarial”platform was successful, bringing speed and practicality tocitizens, thus allowing the expansion of access to justice. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47309 10.5433/1980-511X.2024.v19.n1.47309 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47309 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2024.v19.n1.47309 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/47309/50346 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Rosana de Cássia Ferreira, Ricardo Goretti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Rosana de Cássia Ferreira, Ricardo Goretti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Revista do Direito Público ; 240-258 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305929459499008 |