Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/30452 |
Resumo: | This article addresses the conflict between the right to oblivion and the right to information, especially in the Federal District and Territorial Court judgments, in order to analyze how this matter is being discussed and what grounds and considerations used for its solution. In this way, the research was carried out by means of a bibliographical revision on the fundamental rights, seeking to emphasize the connections of the principle of the dignity of the human person with the concept of the right to forgetfulness. Finally, a summary of the judgments was made, revealing the criteria for weighing each case to resolve the conflict, seeking to establish to what extent the degree of achievement of one justifies the sacrifice of the other, both having the same constitutional relevance . We emphasize that in this research we used the bibliographic review methodologies and relevant case studies. |
id |
UEL-2_36a9f2d90c368ddd43b18a16eaaedf8b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30452 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territoriesDireito ao esquecimento: uma análise jurídica da jurisprudência atual do tribunal de justiça do distrito federal e dos territóriosRight to oblivionRight to be forgottenRight to informationCollision of fundamental rightsJurisprudence of the TJDFT.direito ao esquecimento. Direito à informação. Colisão de direitos fundamentaisJurisprudência do TJDFT.This article addresses the conflict between the right to oblivion and the right to information, especially in the Federal District and Territorial Court judgments, in order to analyze how this matter is being discussed and what grounds and considerations used for its solution. In this way, the research was carried out by means of a bibliographical revision on the fundamental rights, seeking to emphasize the connections of the principle of the dignity of the human person with the concept of the right to forgetfulness. Finally, a summary of the judgments was made, revealing the criteria for weighing each case to resolve the conflict, seeking to establish to what extent the degree of achievement of one justifies the sacrifice of the other, both having the same constitutional relevance . We emphasize that in this research we used the bibliographic review methodologies and relevant case studies.Este artigo aborda o conflito entre o direito ao esquecimento e o direito à informação, especialmente em julgados do Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios, com o propósito de analisar como está sendo discutida esta matéria e quais fundamentos e ponderações utilizadas para a sua solução. Nesse caminho, a pesquisa foi realizada por meio de revisão bibliográfica sobre os direitos fundamentais, buscando-se ressaltar as ligações do princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana com o conceito do direito ao esquecimento. Ao final, realizou-se o resumo dos julgados, revelando os critérios de ponderação em cada caso concreto para solucionar o aludido conflito, buscando estabelecer até que ponto o grau de realização de um justifica o sacrifício do outro, tendo os dois a mesma relevância constitucional. Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3045210.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n1p291Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); 291-3371980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/30452/23482Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Júlio EdstronRibeiro, Diaulas CostaSousa, Maria Sariane de C.2018-04-27T16:19:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30452Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2018-04-27T16:19:03Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories Direito ao esquecimento: uma análise jurídica da jurisprudência atual do tribunal de justiça do distrito federal e dos territórios |
title |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories |
spellingShingle |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories Santos, Júlio Edstron Right to oblivion Right to be forgotten Right to information Collision of fundamental rights Jurisprudence of the TJDFT. direito ao esquecimento. Direito à informação. Colisão de direitos fundamentais Jurisprudência do TJDFT. |
title_short |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories |
title_full |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories |
title_fullStr |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories |
title_full_unstemmed |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories |
title_sort |
Right to forgetfulness: a juridical analysis of current jurisprudence of the court of federal district and territories |
author |
Santos, Júlio Edstron |
author_facet |
Santos, Júlio Edstron Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa Sousa, Maria Sariane de C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa Sousa, Maria Sariane de C. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Júlio Edstron Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa Sousa, Maria Sariane de C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Right to oblivion Right to be forgotten Right to information Collision of fundamental rights Jurisprudence of the TJDFT. direito ao esquecimento. Direito à informação. Colisão de direitos fundamentais Jurisprudência do TJDFT. |
topic |
Right to oblivion Right to be forgotten Right to information Collision of fundamental rights Jurisprudence of the TJDFT. direito ao esquecimento. Direito à informação. Colisão de direitos fundamentais Jurisprudência do TJDFT. |
description |
This article addresses the conflict between the right to oblivion and the right to information, especially in the Federal District and Territorial Court judgments, in order to analyze how this matter is being discussed and what grounds and considerations used for its solution. In this way, the research was carried out by means of a bibliographical revision on the fundamental rights, seeking to emphasize the connections of the principle of the dignity of the human person with the concept of the right to forgetfulness. Finally, a summary of the judgments was made, revealing the criteria for weighing each case to resolve the conflict, seeking to establish to what extent the degree of achievement of one justifies the sacrifice of the other, both having the same constitutional relevance . We emphasize that in this research we used the bibliographic review methodologies and relevant case studies. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/30452 10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n1p291 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/30452 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n1p291 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/30452/23482 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 1 (2018); 291-337 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932117639168 |